In line with the guidelines suggested by the Australian Society of Certified Practising Accountants, a sample of 243 Australian listed companies was used in this study to investigate if the factors of auditee size, audit complexity, audit time, audit quality and audit risk could explain the variation of auditor fees. The model achieved a relatively high level of goodness‐of‐fit (adjusted R equals to 0.7631) and overall significance at p <0.001 (F‐ratio). Like most prior studies, auditee size appeared to be the most important factor explaining audit fee payments. However, adding a non‐audit fee variable provided little incremental explanatory power to the audit pricing model, indicating that providing audit and non‐audit services jointly may not create a “knowledge spillover” which is hypothesised to lead to economic rents.
Article navigation
1 January 1996
Editors
Review Article|
January 01 1996
THE DETERMINANTS OF AUDIT FEES: AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE Available to Purchase
Ming‐Wei Zhang;
Ming‐Wei Zhang
Monash University Gippsland Campus Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Steven Myrteza
Steven Myrteza
Monash University Gippsland Campus Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-8863
Print ISSN: 1321-7348
© MCB UP Limited
1996
Asian Review of Accounting (1996) 4 (1): 81–97.
Citation
Zhang M, Myrteza S (1996), "THE DETERMINANTS OF AUDIT FEES: AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE". Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 4 No. 1 pp. 81–97, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060667
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
The Deteminants of Audit Fees in HongKong: An Empirical Study
Asian Review of Accounting (February,1996)
The Audit Expectation Gap in Singapore: An Empirical Study of Company Audit Objectives
Asian Review of Accounting (January,2000)
An Examination of the Audit Expectations Gap in Singapore
Asian Review of Accounting (January,2000)
Audit committee ownership and audit report lag: evidence from Australia
International Journal of Accounting and Information Management (January,2020)
Auditing Risk, Materiality & Judgement Standards: An International Comparison
Managerial Finance (September,1996)
Related Chapters
Audit Cultures and the Antipodes: The Implications of EurepGAP for New Zealand and Australian Agri-food Industries
Between the Local and the Global
INDEPENDENT SIGN-OFF FOR SITE ASSESSMENTS AND REMEDIATIONS: SUCCESSES AND SHORT-COMINGS IN AUSTRALIAN STATUTORY ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT SYSTEMS
Contaminated Soil 2000: Seventh International FZK/TNO conference on contaminated soil
Local Government Auditing in Australia
Auditing Practices in Local Governments: An International Comparison
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
