In recent years, cost‐effective protection of the environment has become a more important goal for many businesses. Companies have been striving to reduce the environmental impacts of their products and packaging, while not incurring costs that put them at a competitive disadvantage. A key to accomplishing this goal is by benchmarking their performance against other companies. Benchmarking can be expensive, time consuming, or problematic because detailed benchmarking requires detailed, specific data that are generally confidential. A screening level benchmark can accomplish much of the goal quickly and cheaply. Focuses on a tool to make quick, screening level benchmarks of US industrial environmental performance and discusses how it can be used to evaluate a plant's environmental performance. Mentions other tools, notes its relationship to them, and discusses how it can be more broadly used. Finally, suggests ways that this type of benchmarking information can be used broadly within a firm for accounting and decision‐making purposes.
Article navigation
1 April 2003
Review Article|
April 01 2003
Using input‐output analysis for corporate benchmarking Available to Purchase
H. Scott Matthews;
H. Scott Matthews
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Lester B. Lave
Lester B. Lave
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-4094
Print ISSN: 1463-5771
© MCB UP Limited
2003
Benchmarking: An International Journal (2003) 10 (2): 153–168.
Citation
Matthews HS, Lave LB (2003), "Using input‐output analysis for corporate benchmarking". Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2 pp. 153–168, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770310469671
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Assessing social and economic impacts associated with changes in the coal mining industry in the Bowen Basin, Queensland, Australia
Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal (March,2007)
An output approach to property portfolio performance measurement
Property Management (February,2009)
Simultaneous output and input hedging: a decision analysis
Journal of Risk Finance (February,2008)
Applying a non‐deterministic conceptual life cycle costing model to manufacturing processes
Journal of Modelling in Management (November,2010)
2011 Awards for Excellence
Journal of Modelling in Management (March,2012)
Related Chapters
Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Social Audit in Bangladesh
Sustainability Accounting: Education, Regulation, Reporting and Stakeholders
The Contemporary Art of Cost Management Methods during Product Development
Advances in Management Accounting
Social Auditing and Its Applicability to Maltese Co-Operatives
Contemporary Issues in Audit Management and Forensic Accounting
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
