Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to review the epistemology of benchmarking and identify methodological elements of a theory of benchmarking.

Design/methodology/approach

A thematic approach is applied to origins, primal and functional definitions of benchmarking.

Findings

Benchmarking remains theoretically underdetermined, with publications focusing on pragmatism and praxis rather than epistemology. Analysis of the literature leads to a new definition of benchmarking focusing around the teleological processes that lead to state‐transformation of organizations.

Research limitations/implications

A theoretical foundation for benchmarking should be consistent with current organizational paradigms. Going forward the paper aims to develop a theory of benchmarking based on illustrative model derived from the thematic review.

Practical implications

The paper initiates the development of a more rigorous theoretical base for future benchmarking practice, which will strengthen organizations' business cases for undertaking such processes.

Originality/value

Recasts much of the extant literature in beginning to focus on the fundamentals of benchmarking.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal