Since ensuring methodological rigour is a prerequisite for high quality empirical research, this study aims to examine methodological choices in empirical studies on dynamic capabilities (DC), and analyses how well they accommodate the complexity of the concept.
The paper is a systematic review of 142 published peer reviewed journal articles on DC.
Although DC research comprises a balanced mix of qualitative and quantitative studies, there are many problem areas in terms of research methods. First, the use of past performance data against current status of DC must be addressed. Second, as DC deals with change, caution needs to be exercised in the use of cross‐sectional data. Third, the essence of DC should not be lost in operationalization, and the research setting needs to be meaningful from the DC perspective. Finally, DC scholars must devote more attention to proper reporting of the research process and justification of the choices made.
Inadequate rigour encumbers DC research. This study shows the areas for immediate attention. The implications are relevant for DC researchers, journal reviewers and editors as well as readers of scholarly DC articles.
This study is a novel contribution towards understanding the methods used in DC research. It introduces the issue of methodological fit into the DC discussion and highlights the methodological aspects that need to be considered and reported in more detail in future research articles. It also has implications on how to conceptualise DC.
