A computerised relational database management system is used to represent and calculate the embedded energies and carbon coefficients of building materials. The embedded energy requirements are also calculated on the basis of the lowest quality energy (called a “bio-equivalent” basis), in addition to the more conventional basis of Tonnes of Oil Equivalent. Comparisons are then made between alternative materials for building components such as purlins, walls, roofs and windows. Among the more common construction materials considered, the lowest energy option is timber while the highest is steel, with concrete in between. Timber products have negative carbon coefficients as well, i.e. they store more carbon than is emitted in their use for house building. The walls and wall plastering contribute significant proportions of the gross energy of a building, indicating that the use of low energy materials for walls and the elimination of wall plastering will make significant contributions to reducing the embedded energy of buildings. The ratio between total embedded energy and annual operational energy for selected buildings ranges from 14 to 35 for the houses, while for an office building with air-conditioning loading it is around 5.

  • INTRODUCTION

  • ENERGY CONTENTS AND CARBON COEFFICIENTS

  • COMPARISON OF BUILDING MATERIAL ALTERNATIVES

  • DISCUSSION

  • GROSS EMBEDDED ENERGY IN BUILDINGS

  • CONCLUSIONS

  • REFERENCES

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.