Rafts can provide a very cost-effective foundation solution. Their design requires a careful assessment of the soil–structure interaction. Many factors, including soil and raft stiffness, superstructure and sub-structure stiffness, local yield and soil nonlinearity and time-dependent effects, can influence differential settlement and structural forces in the raft. Errors associated with assuming that a raft sits on a bed of uniform soil ‘springs’ are discussed, and a practical alternative is outlined.

Piled rafts, which are a hybrid foundation comprising a raft and piles, can offer many benefits. Currently there is little guidance in the codes and there is confusion about appropriate design methods. Piled-raft behaviour is potentially very complex. Significant simplifications are possible, which facilitate practical design and greater confidence in analysis output. A key aspect is a clear definition of two different types of piled raft: the raft-enhanced pile group and the pile-enhanced raft (previously known as a raft with settlement-reducing piles). The design concepts for each type of piled raft are very different. The intermediate zone between these two types should be avoided.

CONTENTS

  • 56.1

    Introduction 853

  • 56.2

    Analysis of raft behaviour 854

  • 56.3

    Structural design of rafts 860

  • 56.4

    Design of a real raft 861

  • 56.5

    Piled rafts, conceptual design principles 863

  • 56.6

    Raft-enhanced pile groups 868

  • 56.7

    Pile-enhanced rafts 879

  • 56.8

    A case history of a pileenhanced raft – the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre 883

  • 56.9

    Key points 884

  • 56.10

    References 885

You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.