Chapter 4: Exiting School Improvement Sanctions: Accountability, Morale, and the Successful School Turnaround Principal
-
Published:2013
Cindy Corcoran, Craig Peck, Ulrich C. Reitzug, 2013. "Exiting School Improvement Sanctions: Accountability, Morale, and the Successful School Turnaround Principal", School and District Leadership in an Era of Accountability, Bruce G. Barnett, Alan R. Shoho, Alex J. Bowers
Download citation file:
For the past decade, parents, educators, taxpayers, and policymakers have debated the merits of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and the effect its mandated standards-based assessments have had on schools and school districts (Sunderman, Orfield, & Kim, 2006; Valli, Croninger, Chambliss, Graeber, & Buese, 2008). NCLB required a fundamental philosophical shift in the general public’s judgment about what constitutes a good school, moving from appearances (neat classrooms or the amount of books in the library) to academic results (classroom engagement, teacher accountability, and student proficiency). In the NCLB high-stakes testing context, school success has come to be defined as students demonstrating improved proficiency on state-designed end-of-year examinations (Peck & Reitzug, 2013).
