Chapter 6: Containing the Undesirables: Discretion and the Sentencing of Habitual Criminals in Australian Supreme Courts in the Twentieth Century
-
Published:2021
Lisa Durnian, 2021. "Containing the Undesirables: Discretion and the Sentencing of Habitual Criminals in Australian Supreme Courts in the Twentieth Century", History & Crime: A Transdisciplinary Approach, Thomas J. Kehoe, Jeffrey E. Pfeifer
Download citation file:
On 19 May 1941, 47-year-old Albert Joseph Ward appeared in the Queensland Supreme Court, pleading guilty to ‘breaking, entering and stealing’ five pounds from the Canton Café in South Brisbane.1 Ward was only recently released from Brisbane's ‘Boggo Road’ jail after serving 15 months imprisonment for a burglary committed the year before.2 Crown Prosecutor Joseph Sheehy referred to Ward's ‘very bad record’ since 1919, providing Queensland Supreme Court Justice Roslyn Philp with a list of 25 prior convictions across four Australian states.3 Although most of Ward's imprisonment sentences were relatively short periods in detention – the exception being five years' imprisonment and a flogging sentence in Victoria – Justice Philp regarded Ward as ‘an habitual criminal… if ever a man was one’.4 On 3 June 1941, Philp sentenced Ward to 12 months' imprisonment with hard labour and as part of that sentence declared him a habitual criminal.5
