This paper presents results on functional limitations and the use of special aids from the Census Bureau's 1999 Questionnaire Design Experimental Research Survey (QDERS), which included a split-ballot test comparing person-level questions to household-level questions. We find some evidence that the use of a household-level design results in lower survey estimates than the person-level design. The household-level approach, however, produces somewhat more reliable data than the person-level approach and results in a shorter interview than the person-level design. Interviewers administer survey questions equally well in both treatments, and respondents have little difficulty understanding and answering survey questions in either treatment. Item non-response is trivial in both treatments.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.