Numerous articles surveyed associated cross-sector social partnership (CSSP) ­performance with how the collaboration is led. The majority of studies addressing leadership raised an important question in the collaboration literature – is it more successful when a single organization takes a leadership role or when shared governance is the chosen platform? A smaller subset of studies promoted the importance of a coordination mechanism versus strong leadership (Chen & Graddy, 2010; Ritvala, Salmi, & Andersson, 2014). The success of single-sector leadership was assessed by Koliba, Mills, and Zia (2011) and McGuire and Silvia (2010), who reviewed collaborations where a government partner takes a leadership role. In an interesting study of leadership during times of change, Ivery (2010) found that the presence of a formal executive director was difficult for the collaborative partners to accept, but nonetheless was useful in propagating the necessary change. Similarly, in a study of strategic management in collaborations, Clarke and Fuller (2010) found evidence to suggest that a central authority figure was useful in leading the collaboration.

Licensed reuse rights only
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.