Chapter 6: Perpetuating Objectification: Responsiveness Between Self and Social
-
Published:2025
Reazul Haque, 2025. "Perpetuating Objectification: Responsiveness Between Self and Social", Contemporary Gender Transformations in South Asia: Transcending the Archetype of Womanhood, Reazul Haque
Download citation file:
Abstract
This chapter addresses the persistent issue of objectification in South Asia, introducing the concept of “perceptual responsiveness” to explain how individuals recognize and respond to objectifying behaviors developed from gender stereotypes. Objectification, archetypically defined as reducing women to their physical appearance, has harmful psychological and social consequences, particularly affecting mental health, self-esteem, and autonomy. This chapter identifies three key factors that shape perceptual responsiveness: the societal normalization of objectification, the degree of trust and acceptance of objectifying behaviors from various sources, and the media's role in reinforcing or challenging these norms. While the psychological effects of objectification are significant, this chapter expands its focus beyond the archetype of womanhood, acknowledging how value neutrality in inclusivity shapes postgender self-images. It highlights the duality of self-objectification. On the one hand, self-objectification can reflect stereotypes and power imbalances, while on the other hand, it can also perpetuate different forms of agency or empowerment. This chapter examines how media, language, and digital platforms contribute to this perpetuation, acting as both promoters of objectification and tools for resistance. Here, the relative neutrality of values between harmful narratives and the promotion of progressive portrayals also deals with how traditional norms reshape theological ideas of equity and how self-objectification is commercialized, with postidentities of gender. Finally, this chapter discusses how consumer-driven economies dehumanize individuals and influence societal norms surrounding trust, recognition, and morality. It critiques how capitalist reflexivity often limits genuine empowerment by reinforcing hegemonic ideals of success with the cognitive roots and effects of objectification.
