Methodologies for determining patron preferences for monographs are a neglected area in library literature. This article describes a method for determining faculty preferences for monographs using subject headings from a print bibliography. Faculty members from the colleges of business at three public universities in Iowa (Iowa State University, University of Iowa and the University of Northern Iowa) were asked to rank 100 subject areas in business administration based on their perceived importance to programs of study within their colleges or departments. A total of 58 percent of the surveys were returned and 46 percent were included in the analysis. Faculties were grouped by department, and subject areas were grouped into categories by discipline. The survey results show that, with some exceptions, faculty ranked subject groups corresponding to their departments higher than other areas. The implications of this study for collection development librarians are noted.
Article navigation
Research Article|
March 01 2000
A method for determining faculty preferences for monographs Available to Purchase
Jeffrey D. Kushkowski
Jeffrey D. Kushkowski
Jeffrey D. Kushowski is Business and Economics Bibliographer, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2054-5592
Print ISSN: 0160-4953
© MCB UP Limited
2000
Collection Building (2000) 19 (1): 17–32.
Citation
Kushkowski JD (2000), "A method for determining faculty preferences for monographs". Collection Building, Vol. 19 No. 1 pp. 17–32, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01604950010310857
Download citation file:
154
Views
Suggested Reading
A bibliometric study of taxonomic botany
Journal of Documentation (May,2013)
Collection analysis on social work: a cost-effective approach
Collection Building (April,2015)
Centre stage or just a supporting role? International interlending in the twenty‐first century – a UK perspective
Interlending & Document Supply (December,2003)
Monograph ILL for the Higher Education Research Sector. A report to CURL and the British Library Cooperation and Partnership Programme
Interlending & Document Supply (December,2003)
Circulation statistics in the evaluation of collection development
Collection Building (April,2008)
Related Chapters
Management of Content Development and Subject Engagement through an Arts Matrix Model: A Case Study
Advances in Librarianship
“Free Puppies”: Integrating Web Resources into Online Catalogs
Librarianship in Times of Crisis
Check Yo’self Before You Wreck Yo’self: Diversity Residents’ Experiences Expanding CRT and Antiracism Practices in Collection Development
Critical Race Theory in LIS: Challenging White Supremacy in Libraries
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
