Open figure viewer
Purpose
This paper seeks to provide evidence that patron‐driven acquisition is a successful collection development tool.
Design/methodology/approach
The study used cost, usage, and cost per use as measurements to compare patron‐driven acquired print and electronic books with traditionally acquired print and electronic books to determine the success of five different patron‐driven methods.
Findings
The study found that usage is much higher and the cost and cost per use is lower for patron‐driven acquisition methods than for traditional collection development methods.
Originality/value
Collection development and acquisitions librarians can benefit from this research comparing traditional collection development methods with multiple patron‐driven acquisitions methods to better manage their resources.
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2012
You do not currently have access to this content.
