While the intended goal of the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act was to ease access to capital for emerging growth companies (EGCs), prior studies, notably Barth et al. (2017), find evidence of an increase in initial public offering (IPO) underpricing and a higher cost of equity capital for EGC issuers. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that changes in overall IPO market conditions explain the seeming increase in IPO underpricing. In fact, EGC issuers that take advantage of the accounting disclosure relief afforded by the Act raise capital at higher pre-IPO multiples. These reduced-accounting disclosure EGCs have more speculative valuation profiles and lower institutional ownership and are more likely to destroy long-term shareholder value in the IPO aftermarket. Overall, our paper offers an alternative perspective on the effect of the JOBS Act on IPO pricing.
The Jobs Act Did Not Raise IPO Underpricing
We thank Ernst & Young LLP for providing the data on the use of Title I provisions. We thank David Aboody, Chris Holmes (EY), Edwin Hu (SEC), Robert Jackson (SEC), Daniel Klausner (PwC), Polia Nair (EY), George Papadakis (SEC), Steven Solomon, Brett Trueman, and seminar participants at Berkeley Law and Ernst & Young LLP for helpful comments and discussions. We also thank the Office of Investor Education and Advocacy of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for information regarding the JOBS Act. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Center for Financial Research and Management at Berkeley Haas. The views expressed in the paper are the views of the authors and do not represent in any way the views of Ernst & Young LLP. The replication data and code are readily available upon request.
Omri E, Patatoukas Panos N, Yoon Young S (2022), "The Jobs Act Did Not Raise IPO Underpricing". Critical Finance Review, Vol. 11 No. 3-4 pp. 431–471, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/104.00000117
Download citation file:
