Article navigation

We criticize ad-hoc tests of return predictability, like those presented by Li and Wang (2025), which are purely motivated by statistical associations. Without ex-ante hypotheses grounded in theory or evidence on portfolio choice, it is difficult to say what we learn from such correlation exercises. We then discuss how convincing progress can be made in uncovering the foundations of portfolio choice and asset pricing, drawing on our own experimental research for illustration.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options