Constantinides and Perrakis (2002, 2007) derive a lower bound on the price of an option such that an investor increases her utility by buying the option at the ask price if the ask price is lower than the lower bound; and by writing the option at the bid price if the bid price is higher than upper bound. Contrary to the evidence in Constantinides et al. (2009, 2011) who demonstrate several violations of mainly the upper bound on call prices and document a tradable anomaly by exploiting this mispricing, Wallmeier (2020) claims that practically all options on the S&P 500, Eurostoxx 50, and DAX indices lie within the bounds. The main reason for the discrepancy is that Wallmeier erroneously inflates the volatility input to the bounds by about 2% by using the at-the-money implied volatility which is approximately the risk-neutral volatility instead of the physical volatility, as required by the model.
Article navigation
1 April 2021
Research Article|
April 01 2021
Mispricing of Index Options with Respect to Stochastic Dominance Bounds? A Reply
George M. Constantinides;
George M. Constantinides
University of Chicago and National Bureau of Economic Research
, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Michal Czerwonko;
Michal Czerwonko
Nazarbayev University
, Kazakhstan
Search for other works by this author on:
Jens Carsten Jackwerth;
Jens Carsten Jackwerth
University of Konstanz
, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Stylianos Perrakis
Stylianos Perrakis
Concordia University
, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
*
We thank Martin Wallmeier for his comments on our earlier research and for giving us the opportunity to clarify our method and results. We also thank the editor and referee for their comments. Constantinides received financial support from the Center for Research in Security Prices, the University of Chicago.
Online ISSN: 2164-5760
Print ISSN: 2164-5744
© 2021 George M. Constantinides et al.
2021
George M. Constantinides et al.
Licensed re-use rights only
Critical Finance Review (2021) 10 (1): 57–63.
Citation
Constantinides GM, Czerwonko M, Carsten Jackwerth J, Perrakis S (2021), "Mispricing of Index Options with Respect to Stochastic Dominance Bounds? A Reply". Critical Finance Review, Vol. 10 No. 1 pp. 57–63, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/104.00000090
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
The evaluation of real options by managers: a potential aspect of the audit of management skills
Managerial Auditing Journal (August,1998)
A comparison of upward‐only and turnover leases
Journal of Property Investment & Finance (December,2002)
A Comparative Analysis of Informational Efficiency of KOSDAQ50 and KOSPI200 Index Futures
Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies: Seonmul yeon’gu (November,2003)
Is there a priced risk factor associated with conservatism?
Journal of Risk Finance (November,2016)
Related Chapters
An Options Approach to the Project Activation Decision in the Aerospace Industry
Overlaps of Private Sector with Public Sector around the Globe
Chapter 6 Measuring Circumstances: Francs or Ranks, does it Matter?
Inequality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement
Management Entrenchment and Stock Option Backdating
Resistance and Accountability
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
