Breen et al. (1989) show that the negative relation between excess stock returns and Treasury bill rates is economically important. From 1954 to 1986, the predictive ability of interest rates facilitated a trading strategy that generated average returns at least on par with a buy-and-hold market investment but with significantly lower risk. The services of a portfolio manager using this predictive model to invest justified a management fee of nearly 2% per annum. Using currently-available data, we can nearly perfectly replicate Breen et al.’s (1989) key findings in sample. However, the success of Treasury bill rates as a predictor of equity returns appears to be specific to the time period studied. When the same methodology is applied out of sample from 1987 to 2018, there is little statistical or economic evidence of predictability. Additional out-of-sample analysis of G20 countries shows only sporadic support for the notion that interest rates predict equity returns.
Article navigation
2 August 2021
Research Article|
August 02 2021
Treasury Rates No Longer Predict Returns: A Reappraisal of Breen, Glosten and Jagannathan (1989)
Philip Gray;
Philip Gray
Department of Banking and Finance, Monash Business School,
Monash University
, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Thanh Huynh
Thanh Huynh
Department of Banking and Finance, Monash Business School,
Monash University
, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
*
The authors gratefully acknowledge the guidance of Ivo Welch (the editor) throughout this project.
Online ISSN: 2164-5760
Print ISSN: 2164-5744
© 2021 Philip Gray and Thanh Huynh
2021
Philip Gray and Thanh Huynh
Licensed re-use rights only
Critical Finance Review (2021) 10 (3): 429–444.
Citation
Gray P, Huynh T (2021), "Treasury Rates No Longer Predict Returns: A Reappraisal of Breen, Glosten and Jagannathan (1989) ". Critical Finance Review, Vol. 10 No. 3 pp. 429–444, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/104.00000096
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
An Empirical Analysis on Trading strategy of KTB and KTF Using the Two Factors CIR Term Structure Model
Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies: Seonmul yeon’gu (May,2005)
Trading against anchoring
Review of Behavioral Finance (October,2017)
A trading strategy with dual-beta estimates
Managerial Finance (February,2022)
Laeding and Following Variance Risk Premiums: Evidence from S&P500 and KOSPI200 Options
Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies: Seonmul yeon’gu (February,2014)
Small investors’ internet sentiment and return predictability
Review of Behavioral Finance (June,2019)
Related Chapters
Acceptance of Financial Technology in Thailand: Case Study of Algorithm Trading
Banking and Finance Issues in Emerging Markets
Zero-investment Portfolio Strategy and Excess Returns in ESG100 Stocks
Comparative Analysis of Trade and Finance in Emerging Economies
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
