Article navigation

The design of several electromagnetic devices, such as magnets and transformers, leads to a 3D magnetostatic field analysis. Although such problems can be solved by using vector potential formulations, scalar potential techniques seem to be more efficient because of the reduced number of unknowns they introduce. Even these methods, however, present certain drawbacks, depending on the way the scalar potential is defined: considerable cancellation errors in iron parts, difficulties to simulate multiply connected iron cores, a complicated way to compute a source field distribution.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options