Residents of two North Island, New Zealand, communities were surveyed in March 1995 to measure their understanding of volcanic hazards. This was repeated in November 1995, following the Ruapehu eruptions of September‐October 1995. Both communities were subjected to intense media coverage during the 1995 Ruapehu eruption. Whakatane was spared any direct effects, whereas Hastings experienced the hazard directly, in the form of ash falls. Only Hastings’ respondents showed a significant change in threat knowledge and perceived volcanic risk. While experiencing the direct and indirect impacts of the 1995 Ruapehu eruption may make subsequent warnings and information releases more salient, thereby enhancing the likelihood of engaging in successful protective actions or other forms of response, the characteristics of hazard impacts may increase susceptibility to a “normalisation bias”, reducing future community preparedness.
Article navigation
1 May 1999
Case Report|
May 01 1999
Volcanic hazard perceptions: comparative shifts in knowledge and risk
David M. Johnston;
David M. Johnston
David M. Johnston is a Scientist at the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Taupo, New Zealand
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark S. Bebbington Chin‐Diew Lai;
Mark S. Bebbington Chin‐Diew Lai
Search for other works by this author on:
Bruce F. Houghton;
Bruce F. Houghton
Bruce F. Houghton is a Volcanology Programme Leader, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Taupo, New Zealand
Search for other works by this author on:
Douglas Paton
Douglas Paton
Douglas Paton is an Associate Professor of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6100
Print ISSN: 0965-3562
© MCB UP Limited
1999
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal (1999) 8 (2): 118–126.
Citation
Johnston DM, Bebbington Chin‐Diew Lai MS, Houghton BF, Paton D (1999), "Volcanic hazard perceptions: comparative shifts in knowledge and risk". Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2 pp. 118–126, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09653569910266166
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Community vulnerability to volcanic hazard consequences
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal (October,1999)
Causes of slope instability in the Himalayas
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal (June,2009)
Promoting disaster awareness in multicultural societies: the DAG approach
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal (April,2010)
Flood hazard mapping in developing countries: problems and prospects
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal (February,2008)
Landslide management: concept and philosophy
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal (February,2010)
Related Chapters
Vulnerability
Landslide Risk Assessment
Asbestos management
Health and Safety Questions and Answers: A practical approach
Legionella and Legionnaires' disease
Health and Safety Questions and Answers: A practical approach
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
