Compares two corporate governance models: the Anglo‐American and the Continental European model. These corporate governance models differ strongly, and the differences are mainly due to differences in the business context. The problems arising from separation of ownership from control will thus have to be solved through different mechanisms. One important mechanism is the board of directors. The board composition of 122 companies has been analyzed in a Belgian empirical study. From the tests, finds a significant positive relationship between the number of directors in the board and a range of other factors. Shareholder structure does not seem to have an effect on the size of the board. A second variable concerning the composition of the board, is the percentage of external directors. Finds that the number of external directors differs significantly between companies with a different nationality and between companies that are listed or not. Size, shareholder structure and industry were not related to the percentage of external directors in a company.
Article navigation
1 December 2002
Editors
Review Article|
December 01 2002
The Anglo‐American versus the Continental European corporate governance model: empirical evidence of board composition in Belgium
Hubert Ooghe;
Hubert Ooghe
Hubert Ooghe is a Professor, Ernst & Young Chair of Growth Management and Institute of Credit Management (Gerling‐Graydon‐IFB), Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and Department of Corporate Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Search for other works by this author on:
Tine De Langhe
Tine De Langhe
Tine De Langhe is an Assistant at the Department of Corporate Finance, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7107
Print ISSN: 0955-534X
© MCB UP Limited
2002
European Business Review (2002) 14 (6): 437–449.
Citation
Ooghe H, De Langhe T (2002), "The Anglo‐American versus the Continental European corporate governance model: empirical evidence of board composition in Belgium". European Business Review, Vol. 14 No. 6 pp. 437–449, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340210448794
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Unlocking the role of a board director: a review of the literature
Management Decision (October,2008)
Sarbanes‐Oxley legislation and the private company: if not a marriage, then certainly an engagement
Journal of Business Strategy (April,2005)
Corporate governance reforms: profiling at its worst
Journal of Business Strategy (August,2005)
Follow the leader
Journal of Business Strategy (February,2005)
Bad boards and bad jobs: when the money is not enough
The Bottom Line (June,1999)
Related Chapters
Chapter 7 Women on Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Evidence from Denmark and Norway
Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives
Chapter 5 Why Gender Quotas in Company Boards in Norway – and Not in Sweden?
Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives
Building Sustainability Competence from the Top Down: A Model for Researching and Improving Boards of Directors’ Influence on Firms’ Sustainability Performance
Mid-Range Management Theory: Competence Perspectives on Modularity and Dynamic Capabilities
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
