Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Learning outcomes

This case helps students understand the following key concepts: Economics of social media platforms – analyze the economic dynamics of social media platforms, including their business models, revenue generation and market impact; positive and negative information externalities – examine how social media platforms like Twitter/X generate both beneficial and harmful externalities, influencing society, public discourse and political stability; Coase Theorem and externalities – apply the Coase Theorem to understand potential solutions to the externalities caused by social media platforms and how these solutions might address issues like misinformation or censorship; regulation of social media platforms – explore the challenges and considerations governments face when regulating social media, balancing public interest, free speech and national security concerns; and social media, peer effects, information cascades, herd behavior and confirmation bias – investigate the psychological and social dynamics at play on social media, including how peer influence, information cascades, herd behavior and confirmation bias shape online discussions and influence public opinion.

Case overview/synopsis

On May 26, 2024, Ataullah Tarar, Pakistan’s Minister of Information and Broadcasting, was confronted with a difficult decision regarding the ongoing ban on X (formerly Twitter), imposed by the interim government in February 2024 after the tense general elections. The ban, intended to curb misinformation and hate speech in a politically fragile environment, had sparked protests and a legal problem when the ban was challenged in a provincial court. While Tarar understood the risks posed by the platform, including the spread of harmful content, he was also aware of X/Twitter’s significant role in supporting small businesses, social media activists and economic opportunities, particularly for SMEs that relied on the platform for marketing and networking. Caught between the need to protect public order and the desire to foster free speech and economic innovation, Tarar grappled with whether to maintain the ban or lift it, weighing the broader implications for public discourse and the digital economy. Ultimately, his decision would have significant consequences for both the regulation of social media and the balance between protecting citizens from disinformation and preserving democratic freedoms.

Complexity academic level

MS (Public Policy), MS (Innovation and Technology), MBA.

Supplementary material

Teaching notes are available for educators only.

Subject code

CSS7: Management Science

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$6.80

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal