The many studies into the relationships between formalization and innovation have produced little but inconsistent findings. The conceptual and operational definition of the formalization construct is proposed to be one of the reasons for these inconsistencies. It is argued that aggregate (organization‐level) measurements of formalization are inappropriate and should be replaced with department‐specific or process‐specific measurements. Second, it is argued that formalization has been defined in an inconsistent way. However, it is not just the coexistence of different definitions (and their measurements) that is problematic. The exclusion, or improper inclusion, of rule observation from the conceptualization of formalization appears to be a third fallacy. A revised definition of formalization is advanced as a solution to these problems. This definition may prove to be instrumental in determining the true effect of formalization on organizational innovation.
Article navigation
1 December 2002
Research Article|
December 01 2002
Formalization and innovation revisited
Wynand E.J. Bodewes
Wynand E.J. Bodewes
Wynand E.J. Bodewes is Professor of Entrepreneurship at the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7115
Print ISSN: 1460-1060
© MCB UP Limited
2002
European Journal of Innovation Management (2002) 5 (4): 214–223.
Citation
Bodewes WE (2002), "Formalization and innovation revisited". European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 5 No. 4 pp. 214–223, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060210451171
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
TOWARDS A LEARNING ORGANIZATION: 2. THE METHOD
Industrial and Commercial Training (February,1992)
Getting it right the first time: Alfred Chandler, anthracite coal, and the origins of American management
Management Decision (March,2005)
Managerial strategies to reorient hospitals towards health promotion: Lessons from organisational theory
J Health Organ Manag (October,2013)
The swing of the pendulum
Managing Service Quality: An International Journal (February,1993)
Styles of Scholarship: “Tonight Let’s Do Thompson”
Journal of Organizational Change Management (February,1989)
Related Chapters
Overcoming Management Accounting Myopia: Broadening the Strategic Focus
Advances in Management Accounting
Nothing New Under the Sun: Novelty Constructs and Measures in Social Studies
The Generation, Recognition and Legitimation of Novelty
Relational Trust: An Ethnographic Look at Staff and Students’ Relationships in an Afterschool Program
Education and Youth Today
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
