Government policies of accountability have led to the imposition of a type of quality measurement on British universities in the form of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). The crudeness of the measures taken raises many questions of reliability and validity in the results. However, the high profile of those results and the implications for long‐term funding have led to obsession in many universities in performing well in the RAE, leading many academics to exhibit BORED symptoms (B***** Obsessive Research assessment Exercise Disorder). Because of their large size relative to other university departments, much of the pressure for improved scores is borne by business schools. This paper argues that, for a number of compelling reasons, for business schools to devote their efforts and resources to improving their RAE scores is likely to be damaging and counter‐productive.
Article navigation
1 February 2000
Research Article|
February 01 2000
Commentary: Why it is fundamentally stupid for a business school to try to improve its research assessment exercise score
Nigel Piercy
Nigel Piercy
Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7123
Print ISSN: 0309-0566
© MCB UP Limited
2000
European Journal of Marketing (2000) 34 (1-2): 27–35.
Citation
Piercy N (2000), "Commentary: Why it is fundamentally stupid for a business school to try to improve its research assessment exercise score". European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 1-2 pp. 27–35, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010306179
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Further comment: Tales of the Gulag
European Journal of Marketing (February,2000)
Manoeuvring towards research decline: The RAE and the decline of Britain's international research standing
European Journal of Marketing (April,2011)
The doctorate: a possible continuing professional development route for library and information service practitioners
Librarian Career Development (March,1995)
Assessing the assessment: how institutions administered, interpreted, and used SAILS
Reference Services Review (February,2010)
Design and development of rubrics to improve assessment outcomes: A pilot study in a Master's level business program in India
Quality Assurance in Education (February,2011)
Related Chapters
Competition in the Global Business School Field
Worldviews and Values in Higher Education: Institutional Governance, Leadership, and Capacity Building
Decolonising Business Schools
Innovations in Decolonising the Curriculum: Multidisciplinary Perspectives
Walking South Africa’s Business Ethics Talk: How Higher Education and Commercial Enterprises Can Co-create a Thriving Cohesive Society
Transcendent Development: The Ethics of Universal Dignity
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
