MASH has been a feature of safeguarding practices in England and Wales since 2011, bringing safeguarding agencies together to effectively share information and prevent organizational silos. Core agencies include the police, social care, and health, with key features of co-location, joint decision-making and co-ordination. A standardised definition for MASH implementation does not exist, and this lack of a clear definition has meant various structures have emerged, impacting on safeguarding practices. This policy brief draws on workshops with a range of safeguarding practitioners between May and July 2022, about the challenges of collaborative working practices and how MASH can become more standardised. Whilst national standardisation is required, there needs to be flexibility when implementing guidelines, so that practices and processes reflect regional needs and resources.
Article navigation
22 December 2023
Research Article|
March 20 2023
Standardising multi-agency safeguarding hubs (MASH): building a framework to effectively identify and manage risk
Sarah Shorrock;
Sarah Shorrock
University of Bradford
, Bradford, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Steven Parker;
Steven Parker
Open University
, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Gareth Addidle;
Gareth Addidle
University of Bradford
, Bradford, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Dimelow;
Mark Dimelow
Northumbria University
, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Joyce Liddle;
Joyce Liddle
Northumbria University
, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Douglas Martin;
Douglas Martin
University of Central Lancashire
, Preston, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Tony Procto;
Tony Procto
University of Central Lancashire
, Preston, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Philippa Olive
Philippa Olive
University of Central Lancashire
, Preston, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2631-3952
© 2023 Shorrock, S. et al.
2023
Shorrock, S. et al.
This is an open access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Emerald Open Research (2023) 1 (13)
Citation
Shorrock S, Parker S, Addidle G, Dimelow M, Liddle J, Martin D, Procto T, Olive P (2023), "Standardising multi-agency safeguarding hubs (MASH): building a framework to effectively identify and manage risk". Emerald Open Research, Vol. 1 No. 13 pp. No Pagination Specified, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EOR-13-2023-0022
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
A practice framework to support the Care Act 2014
The Journal of Adult Protection (February,2016)
Mental health, vulnerability and risk in police custody
The Journal of Adult Protection (October,2017)
Managing risks in work-integrated learning programmes: a cross-institutional collaboration
Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning (December,2019)
Practitioner perspectives of multi-agency safeguarding hubs (MASH)
The Journal of Adult Protection (December,2019)
Collaborating across health and social care: joint funding an adult protection Coordinator post in Caerphilly, UK
The Journal of Adult Protection (April,2015)
Related Chapters
Understanding How Perceptions of Children Shape Perceptions of Risk and Needs in Relation to Safeguarding Concerns in Schools
Understanding Safeguarding for Children and Their Educational Experiences: A Guide for Students, ECTs and School Support Staff
Vulnerability and Risk – Policing Paradox
Reimagining Public Sector Management: A New Age of Renewal and Renaissance?
The Quest for Crisis Management Keystone: Reflections on the Future of Risk, Crisis and Disaster Research and Practice
Communication in Uncertain Times: How Organizations Deal with issues, Risks and Crises
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
