Article navigation
Purpose

Bullying is a persistent, damaging feature of neoliberal workplaces, despite the increased use of third-party interventions (TPIs). The purpose of this paper is to investigate how TPIs relate to individualisation of the employment contract, whether TPIs deflect attention away from bullying and the impact for targets.

Design/methodology/approach

Data were gathered from focus groups and interviews with members and officials of three large UK trade unions.

Findings

TPIs individualise bullying allegations and such interventions are further characterised by impotence, injustice and lack of impartiality, serving to deflect bullying claims and exacerbate targets’ suffering.

Practical implications

Recommendations are made to improve the efficacy of interventions.

Originality/value

This paper increases the limited research into the efficacy of TPIs and makes a significant contribution to debates on neoliberal individualism.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options