To analyse the HRM response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic by an organisation severely affected by the subsequent crisis, i.e. Nav Canada.
The paper draws on data from a large-scale study of air navigation service providers and presents a case study of Nav Canada that is comprised of interviews, focus groups and secondary source data analysis.
Several lenses through which the HRM signal passes are identified that are used by the trade union to refract the HRM signal before relaying it both to stakeholders within the organisation, i.e. its members, and to stakeholders beyond the organisation, in this case, the general public and the Canadian government.
Future research might explore the degree to which lenses amplify or refract the HRM signal, assessing which is most effective to ensure amplification and avoid refraction and under what conditions. Research that assesses the comparative efficacy of temporal versus among group (in)consistency or in HRM policies and HRM processes (and in particular the employment relations climate) in forming lenses is especially welcome. Longitudinal studies that explore the attitudes of workers to the HRM signal over time, explaining why changes in attitudes are observed, will be highly instructive.
The study reveals the dangers of responding to crises with alacrity and without the cooperation and buy-in (or consensus) among workers and their trade unions. Where difficult decisions have to be made, the manner in which they are made is an important influence on how trade unions and employees are likely to respond.
The HRM system strength model and HRM signalling theory are advanced via the application of the lens metaphor, by which it is possible to include aspects of the broader employment relationship that are often omitted from mainstream HRM analysis. The paper also explains the role of the trade union in the HRM signalling process.
