To an ever increasing extent the general public is becoming exasperated at the apparent inability of those directly concerned to deal effectively with the industrial relations problems which beset our advancing technological society. More clearly than ever is it becoming recognized that matters relating to trade union structure and attitudes and those relating to management philosophy and training have to be seen as much more than domestic issues, of concern only to those working within the industrial spectrum. It is not only that there is alarm about the impact of strikes and go‐slow policies on the national economy, but there is concern too about the increased incidence of industrial accidents, neurosis and delinquency (a good deal of which, in the view of many authorities, can be attributed to unsatisfactory employment conditions). It is, after all (as those concerned with industry are reminded), the public agencies outside the sphere of industry which have to cope with the consequences of these social ills. Despite the shortening of hours, man's preoccupation within his working enviroment still comprises a sizeable proportion of the total span of life. Society has a right to demand that working conditions shall be so organized as to permit those occupied within it to derive the maximum of satisfaction for both mind and body. It can indeed be argued that the stable development of our social democracy, the maintenance of human health and well being, and the control of crime, depends very much on the success of such efforts. It therefore is much to be regretted that so little has been done in the way of intensive research with a view to discovering the extent of and the real nature, of the impact which industrial involvement has on human beings. Those advanced in years are, of course, fully conscious of the fact that much of the drudgery and hard physical effort which was a feature of industrial employment in earlier years, has been swept away. Yet few would claim that as a consequence of this, the working population as a whole is more contented than it was say fifty years ago. Other industrial ills — anxieties, frustrations and boredom have increased in their severity.
Article navigation
1 August 1968
This article was originally published in
Technical Education and Industrial Training
Review Article|
August 01 1968
Aspects of Industrial relations
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2977-702X
Print ISSN: 0374-4701
© MCB UP Limited
1968
Technical Education and Industrial Training (1968) 10 (8): 312–322.
Citation
Huddleston J (1968), "Aspects of Industrial relations". Technical Education and Industrial Training, Vol. 10 No. 8 pp. 312–322, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb016004
Download citation file:
631
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
JAMES v. WOODALL DUCKHAM CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
Knight's Industrial Law Reports (September,1969)
Personality, pathology and mindsets: part 3 – pathologies and corruption
Kybernetes (January,2014)
Am I bipolar or what? Exploring the phenomenological, treatment and prognosis overlap of borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder
Mental Health Review Journal (June,2020)
THE SEARCH FOR THE IDEAL
BLL Review (January,1974)
The role of individual characteristics and working conditions in understanding boredom at work
Personnel Review (November,2021)
Related Chapters
Tales of the Unexpected: The Use of Narrative in Studies of Experimental Neurosis
Including a Symposium on Mary Morgan: Curiosity, Imagination, and Surprise
Death, Neurosis, Normalcy, and Massacre: On the Ubiquity of Personal and Social Delusions
Death and Delusion: A Freudian Analysis of Mortal Terror
A Riddle, Wrapped in a Mystery, Inside an Enigma … or Just Multidimensional? Testing the Multidimensional Structure of Boredom
New Ways of Studying Emotions in Organizations
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
