This paper presents a comparative study of three well‐established building maintenance forecasting models in conjunction with a quantitative model which has been developed recently. After a brief introduction of each method, data collected from a large building survey were mapped into four distinctive methods and comparison was carried out in terms of priorities that these four methods adopt for future maintenance work. An analysis of responses to a questionnaire including 100 companies and individuals involved in maintenance and facilities management work (including quantity surveyors’ organisations) revealed that 100 percent of the public sector organisations use maintenance assessment methods for their prioritisation of maintenance management work. It also revealed that 92 percent of the private sector and 95 percent of all the organisations use condition based maintenance assessment methods for the prioritisation of maintenance operations. Results of this questionnaire have been used as introductory material to support the necessity for this piece of research.
Article navigation
1 May 2002
Research Article|
May 01 2002
Quantitative models for building repair and maintenance: a comparative case‐study
Amir M. Alani;
Amir M. Alani
Amir M. Alani is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert P. Tattersall;
Robert P. Tattersall
Robert P. Tattersall is a MEng Student, at the University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael I. Okoroh
Michael I. Okoroh
Michael I. Okoroh is Director of the Built Environment Research Group, School of Computer and Technology, Division of Design, Technology and Built Environment, University of Derby, Derby, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7131
Print ISSN: 0263-2772
© MCB UP Limited
2002
Facilities (2002) 20 (5-6): 176–189.
Citation
Alani AM, Tattersall RP, Okoroh MI (2002), "Quantitative models for building repair and maintenance: a comparative case‐study". Facilities, Vol. 20 No. 5-6 pp. 176–189, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770210426666
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Better buildings for Industry
Facilities (July,2001)
CIOB gets tough with rogue and incompetent traders
Facilities (December,1999)
Repair methods for tile‐clad buildings in Hong Kong
Structural Survey (March,1998)
Fungal decay in oak building timbers
Structural Survey (April,1992)
Related Chapters
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE FAILURE PATTERNS AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES FOR PLAIN CONCRETE WITH CRACKS
Challenges of Concrete Construction: Volume 3, Repair, Rejuvenation and Enhancement of Concrete: Proceedings of the International Seminar held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK on 5–6 September 2002
A Retrospective and Prospective Analysis in the Health Management Through Applied Innovation
The Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives of Management: Challenges and Opportunities
Embrace Complexity Theory, Perform Contrarian Case Analysis, and Model Multiple Realities
Bad to Good: Achieving High Quality and Impact in Your Research
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
