Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

In this paper the effects of choosing dependent variables and cell face velocities on convergence of the SIMPLE algorithm are discussed. Using different velocity components as either dependent variables or cell‐face velocities, both convergent rate and calculation accuracy of the algorithm are compared and studied. A novel method, named “cross‐correction”, is developed to improve the convergence of the algorithm of using non‐orthogonal grids. Cases with benchmark and analytical solutions are used for numerical experiments and validation. The results show that, although different velocity components are employed as either dependent variables or cell face velocities, there is no obvious difference in both the convergent rates and numerical solutions. Moreover, the “cross‐correction” method is validated by computations with several first‐order and high‐order convection schemes; and the generality of convergence improvement achieved by the method is shown in the paper.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal