Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

Discusses factors emerging from research into the management and organizational processes involved in developing services for HIV/AIDS which affected the speed and character of the response made by health authorities. An early response was promoted by perceived high local prevalence, an existing service infrastructure, and high status individuals “championing” the issue and helping to foster a mobilizing sense of crisis. Responses were shaped by the diverse interests and perspectives of those developing services; the lack of established guidelines for treatment and service delivery; and ring‐fenced funding. The idiosyncratic nature of initial service development has sometimes made later strategic choices difficult. Argues that if the momentum of service development is to be sustained, HIV/AIDS needs to be integrated into mainstream service provision and managers need improved information about local prevalence and the evaluation of service initiatives.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal