Skip to Main Content
Purpose

The rise and expansion of over-the-top (OTT) platforms have transformed the entertainment industry by emphasizing consumer preferences, enhancing accessibility, and fostering innovation. However, certain obstacles continue to hinder the delivery of customer over-the-top experience (COTTE). To fill this gap, this study uncovers the underlying barriers to COTTE.

Design/methodology/approach

To accomplish this, the study employed an integrated methodology to analyze the identified barriers to COTTE. First, barriers were identified through a systematic literature review and content analysis, and experts from both industry and academia further validated them. Finally, by utilizing Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) and Fuzzy Matriced’ Impacts Croise's Multiplication Appliqu'ee an un Classement (Fuzzy MICMAC), the study examines the interrelationships among the identified barriers and classifies them based on their driving and dependence power, respectively.

Findings

The results indicate that technological and infrastructural barriers, economic affordability barriers, language and localization barriers, and privacy and data security barriers are the key barriers that impede customers' OTT experience.

Research limitations/implications

This study adds to the existing body of literature on customer experience in OTT platforms by providing a structured decision-making framework. The findings of this study serve as a valuable guide for OTT service providers in delivering an enhanced customer experience.

Originality/value

This study is the foremost empirical study that identifies and analyzes the customer-specific barriers to COTTE based on experts' input and existing literature.

With the rise of the Internet as a dominant streaming medium and the rapid advancement of digital technologies, over-the-top (OTT) media platforms have transformed how consumers access, engage, and experience digital content. OTT service platforms, which deliver content directly to customers over the Internet without set-top boxes, have grown significantly (Rahe et al., 2021; Rahman and Arif, 2021). The OTT industry is expected to reach a valuation of USD 0.70 trillion in 2025 and is forecasted to grow to USD 1.47 trillion by 2030, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.14% throughout the 2025–2030 period (Mordor Intelligence, 2025). Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney+ Hotstar are the leading companies in this sector and hold a significant share of the market (Nafees et al., 2021). These platforms allow customers to move beyond traditional content consumption by using high-speed internet, affordable data plans, and smart devices (Nandukrishna and Sridevi, 2024).

OTT platforms allow users to access TV shows and movies on demand, customizing their viewing experience, thereby redefining customer experience in the entertainment industry. Owing to their personalized user experiences, convenience, and diverse range of content, these platforms are gaining popularity (Yoon and Kim, 2023). The evolution of OTT platforms, driven by technological advancements, convenience, and shifting customer preferences, has significantly transformed consumer behaviour (Polisetty et al., 2023). However, variations in user interests and attention spans have led to inconsistent content consumption patterns, influencing overall customer experience (Alsharif et al., 2021). Customer experience fundamentally reflects how consumers assess the treatment received from service providers. It is intricate and multifaceted, encompassing numerous touchpoints that contribute to a distinctive, memorable, and satisfying engagement journey (Kuppelwieser and Klaus, 2021). It encompasses the psychological, emotional, and cognitive connection between a company and its customers (Palmer, 2010). The perceptions and emotional responses of consumers toward online video creators who stream content over the internet is defined as the Customer Over-the-Top Experience (COTTE) (Kalra et al., 2024). Improved online customer experience encourages long-term adoption of a service (Lee et al., 2022) and is crucial to a business's success in the digital landscape (Carey, 2023). Building brand loyalty and achieving business success on OTT platforms requires a flawless, hassle-free, and engaging content experience (Ahmad et al., 2022). However, prior research on OTT context has primarily focused on understanding the drivers of user adoption, sustained usage, customer engagement, and willingness to pay, giving limited attention to understanding the barriers that hinder the COTTE.

The study is among the first to address the critical gap by identifying and analysing key barriers impeding COTTE, and it is positioned at the intersection of digital service management and customer experience research. Previous researchers have explored factors influencing user adoption and satisfaction in digital media environments; there is a paucity of comprehensive frameworks that systematically uncover, structure, and prioritize the multifaceted barriers impeding COTTE. For this purpose, the study employed an integrated method to identify and analyze the barriers to COTTE. First, barriers were identified through a systematic literature review and content analysis, and experts from both industry and academia further validated them. A systematic literature review (SLR) was undertaken to identify relevant studies, followed by a content analysis using first- and second-order coding to systematically derive and classify the key barriers impeding COTTE. Finally, by utilizing Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) and Fuzzy Matriced’ Impacts Croise's Multiplication Appliqu'ee an un Classement (Fuzzy MICMAC), the study examines the interrelationships among the identified barriers and classifies them based on their driving and dependence power, respectively. The findings of this study will guide academics, industry practitioners, and policymakers in prioritizing interventions that can drive superior customer experiences and foster sustainable competitive advantage in the rapidly evolving OTT landscape.

The structure of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents a review of relevant literature and identifies the research gap. Section 3 explains the application of SLR, content analysis, ISM, and FMICMAC techniques used to examine the barriers influencing customer experience on OTT platforms. Section 4 outlines the results, followed by Section 5, which discusses the findings, contribution, and implications. Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper by highlighting insights, limitations, and directions for future research.

The concept of customer experience encompasses a broad spectrum of actions and emotional responses that emerge naturally throughout the customer journey, often emerging spontaneously in reaction to stimuli related to a product or service (Becker and Jaakkola, 2020). The overall customer experience represents a consumer's comprehensive and holistic interaction with a company, emphasizing the importance of the totality of connections that exist between the consumer and the organization (Harris et al., 2003). Each interaction with an online retailer elicits an internal and subjective response from the consumer (Gulfraz et al., 2022). OTT platforms refer to digital services that allow users to access video and audio content through internet-enabled devices (Palomba, 2022). According to the (FCC, 2013), OTT can be described as a video distribution service that delivers programming content to viewers over the Internet. The notion of online customer experience focuses on an individual's engagement with a particular online service, aiming to foster sustained usage and continued interaction with that service (Lee et al., 2022). Within the OTT context, customer experience evolves into a more specific construct termed COTTE, which captures users' perceptions, emotional responses, and behavioral tendencies during their engagement with streaming platforms (Kalra et al., 2024).

Despite the rapid growth and transformative potential of the OTT sector, achieving a seamless and satisfying customer experience remains a significant challenge for service providers. Indian OTT platform user penetration stands at only 4.6%, far below the global average of 16.2%. The difference highlights the necessity to identify the sector-specific barriers to COTTE in the given context (Statista, 2025). Moreover, individual preferences, fluctuating attention spans, and expectations for high-quality, personalized, and value-driven content further complicate the landscape (Chakraborty et al., 2023). Few studies have explored the barriers to customer experience in domains such as retail (Ghatak, 2024; Kamoonpuri and Sengar, 2023), food delivery applications (Kaur et al., 2021), and craftsmanship (Tarquini et al., 2022). Existing studies in the OTT context have focused on the factors leading to the adoption (Bhattacharyya et al., 2021; Dasgupta and Priya, 2019; Kakkar and Kakkar, 2018; Sharma and Kakkar, 2022; Shin et al., 2016), continuous usage (Yoon and Kim, 2023), customer engagement (Gupta and Singharia, 2021), willingness to pay (Kim et al., 2017; Nagaraj et al., 2021). Research focusing explicitly on the barriers to customer experience in OTT platforms is limited. A few studies have addressed barriers affecting OTT platform usage behaviour (Agarwal et al., 2023), adoption of OTT services (Polisetty et al., 2023) and continuance and discontinuance of OTT platforms (Nandukrishna and Sridevi, 2024).These fragmented views fail to provide a holistic understanding of the multi-dimensional barriers, such as technological, organizational, regulatory, and user-centric, that collectively shape customer experience on OTT platforms. Moreover, the interaction among these barriers and their relative influence may vary across contexts and industries. Hence, there remains a significant gap in the existing literature concerning the systematic identification and analysis of interrelated barriers that constrain customer experience on OTT platforms, especially in the context of India's rapidly evolving digital ecosystem.

The study employed an integrated methodology to identify and analyze the barriers to COTTE. In the initial phase, a systematic review of existing literature and a detailed content analysis were carried out to identify and categorize potential barriers, and further, it was validated and refined based on the experts' input. In the second phase, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) was employed to explore the interrelationships among the identified barriers and to develop a hierarchical, multi-level structural framework. Finally, in the third phase, MICMAC analysis was performed to classify the barriers according to their driving and dependence power. The complete step-by-step research process is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1
A flowchart shows I S M modeling steps to identify and analyze barriers to C O T T E.The diagram includes rectangular and diamond boxes. On the left side, the process begins with “Identification of list of barriers of C O T T E”. This connects downward to “Establish contextual relationship (X i j) between barriers (i, j)”. The flow continues to “Develop a Structural Self- Interaction Matrix (S S I M)”, followed by “Develop an initial reachability matrix”. Next is “Develop a final reachability matrix by using the transitivity”, then “Partition the final reachability matrix into different levels”. The sequence continues to “Develop a diagram”, followed by “Remove transitivity from the diagram”, and then “Replace variable nodes with relationship statement”. On the right side, the process begins with “Literature Review (S L R and Content Analysis)” and “Expert Opinion”, both feeding into “Identification of list of barriers of C O T T E” and “Establish contextual relationship (X i j) between barriers (i, j)”, respectively. Below this, a decision diamond box labeled “Is there any conceptual inconsistency?” appears. An arrow labeled “Yes” and “Necessary modification” leads upward to “Expert Opinion”. An arrow labeled “No” leads downward to “Represent relationship of barriers to C O T T E into I S M based model”. From this point, the flow continues downward through “Develop Binary Direct Relationship Matrix (B D R M) using initial reachability matrix”, followed by “Achieve Fuzzy Direct Relationship Matrix (F D R M) and convert into Final F D R M”. Next is “Calculate the driving and dependency levels of the barriers”, and finally “Categorization of barriers into four categories to determine the impediments to C O T T E”. An arrow from “Replace variable nodes with relationship statement” leads to the decision diamond box.

Flow diagram of the research method used in this study

Figure 1
A flowchart shows I S M modeling steps to identify and analyze barriers to C O T T E.The diagram includes rectangular and diamond boxes. On the left side, the process begins with “Identification of list of barriers of C O T T E”. This connects downward to “Establish contextual relationship (X i j) between barriers (i, j)”. The flow continues to “Develop a Structural Self- Interaction Matrix (S S I M)”, followed by “Develop an initial reachability matrix”. Next is “Develop a final reachability matrix by using the transitivity”, then “Partition the final reachability matrix into different levels”. The sequence continues to “Develop a diagram”, followed by “Remove transitivity from the diagram”, and then “Replace variable nodes with relationship statement”. On the right side, the process begins with “Literature Review (S L R and Content Analysis)” and “Expert Opinion”, both feeding into “Identification of list of barriers of C O T T E” and “Establish contextual relationship (X i j) between barriers (i, j)”, respectively. Below this, a decision diamond box labeled “Is there any conceptual inconsistency?” appears. An arrow labeled “Yes” and “Necessary modification” leads upward to “Expert Opinion”. An arrow labeled “No” leads downward to “Represent relationship of barriers to C O T T E into I S M based model”. From this point, the flow continues downward through “Develop Binary Direct Relationship Matrix (B D R M) using initial reachability matrix”, followed by “Achieve Fuzzy Direct Relationship Matrix (F D R M) and convert into Final F D R M”. Next is “Calculate the driving and dependency levels of the barriers”, and finally “Categorization of barriers into four categories to determine the impediments to C O T T E”. An arrow from “Replace variable nodes with relationship statement” leads to the decision diamond box.

Flow diagram of the research method used in this study

Close modal

The initial stage comprised a systematic review of the literature and a content analysis aimed at identifying representative barriers to COTTE identified in the literature. Additionally, inputs were obtained from experts in academia and industry to validate the identified barriers in the given context. SLR was used to gather, examine, and synthesize existing knowledge, as well as identify what remains unknown, concerning a particular theme of interest (Briner et al., 2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al., 2009) were deployed to reduce selection bias and capture a diverse range of perspectives on barriers to COTTE. In terms of search strategy, the search string was defined as TITLE-ABS KEY, (“barrier*” OR “challenge*” OR “inhibitor*” OR “impediment*”) AND (“experience*” OR “viewer experience*”) AND (“over-the-top” OR “OTT” OR “over-the-top service” OR “streaming video” OR “video-on-demand”) AND (“technology”) and applied to titles, abstracts and keywords to include as much relevant research as possible within the field. Relevant articles were collected from the Scopus database to maintain a high level of rigor. The review protocol also outlined the inclusion and exclusion criteria for choosing articles. The inclusion criteria for the review were established as follows: (1) articles published in journals, (2) articles written in English, (3) articles addressing barriers of customer experience, (4) articles addressing barriers of OTT platforms, (5) articles addressing barriers of technology-related articles. Figure 2 illustrates the sequential stages of the review process developed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. In accordance with the defined review protocol, systematic database searches yielded a total of 261 articles. Of these, 189 were identified as journal publications, and 163 were written in English. During the selection of primary studies, articles were screened and analyzed based on their titles, abstracts, and keywords, resulting in 139 relevant papers. Subsequently, 92 articles met all five inclusion criteria and were retained as the final sample.

Figure 2
A flowchart shows article selection from identification to included studies.The flowchart representing the process of selecting articles for a study, organized into four stages labeled “Identification”, “Screening”, “Eligibility”, and “Included” on the left. Each stage contains boxes with article counts, connected by arrows showing progression and exclusions. In the “Identification” stage, the box states “261 articles were identified through selected database”. An arrow from this box points to the right toward “72 articles were excluded as they were not published in”, indicating removed records. In the “Screening” stage, the next box states “189 articles were published in journal”. An arrow from this box points to the right toward “26 articles were not in English language”. In the “Eligibility” stage, the next box states “163 articles were in English language”. An arrow from this box points to the right toward “24 articles did not meet the inclusion criterion”. Below this, another box states “139 articles were considered for full-text review”. An arrow from this box points to the right toward “47 articles did not meet the criterion”. In the “Included” stage, the final box states “92 articles were included for the study”. Arrows connect each stage vertically from “Identification” to “Included”.

PRISMA framework

Figure 2
A flowchart shows article selection from identification to included studies.The flowchart representing the process of selecting articles for a study, organized into four stages labeled “Identification”, “Screening”, “Eligibility”, and “Included” on the left. Each stage contains boxes with article counts, connected by arrows showing progression and exclusions. In the “Identification” stage, the box states “261 articles were identified through selected database”. An arrow from this box points to the right toward “72 articles were excluded as they were not published in”, indicating removed records. In the “Screening” stage, the next box states “189 articles were published in journal”. An arrow from this box points to the right toward “26 articles were not in English language”. In the “Eligibility” stage, the next box states “163 articles were in English language”. An arrow from this box points to the right toward “24 articles did not meet the inclusion criterion”. Below this, another box states “139 articles were considered for full-text review”. An arrow from this box points to the right toward “47 articles did not meet the criterion”. In the “Included” stage, the final box states “92 articles were included for the study”. Arrows connect each stage vertically from “Identification” to “Included”.

PRISMA framework

Close modal

3.2.1 Phase 1: content analysis

To identify the representative barriers influencing COTTE from the above shortlisted studies, a two-tiered approach of first- and second-order constructs was employed, where the second-order constructs represent a higher level of abstraction. The initially extracted first-order barriers, derived directly from the existing OTT literature, were found to be fragmented and loosely structured. To achieve greater conceptual coherence, these first-order barriers were systematically grouped into second-order constructs, enabling the identification of key themes and recurring patterns that shape customer experience on OTT platforms. This hierarchical categorization aligns with the methodological recommendations of Seuring and Gold (2012), White and Marsh (2006), ensuring both analytical rigor and comprehensiveness in capturing the multidimensional nature of barriers influencing COTTE.

Expert judgment was employed to validate the identified barriers from the existing literature. A total of 15 experts—seven from academia and eight from industry (please see Table 1)—were purposefully selected based on their expertise in marketing and customer experience or having over eight years of professional experience in the entertainment and customer service sectors. Experts evaluated and discussed eight potential barriers affecting COTTE through semi-structured interviews. Based on their collective assessment, eight major barriers were finalized using the principle that a barrier was retained if at least eight out of the fifteen experts identified it as a significant impediment to COTTE.

Table 1

Profile of experts

ExpertFieldDesignationYears of experience
Expert 1IndustryHead of Marketing8
Expert 2IndustrySenior Digital Marketing Associate13
Expert 3IndustryAssociate Director10
Expert 4IndustryCustomer Support Manager8
Expert 5IndustryCEO17
Expert 6IndustryMarketing Manager10
Expert 7IndustryMarketing Director15
Expert 8IndustrySocial Media Manager9
Expert 9AcademicsAssociate Professor13
Expert 10AcademicsAssociate Professor10
Expert 11AcademicsAssociate Professor9
Expert 12AcademicsProfessor11
Expert 13AcademicsProfessor8
Expert 14AcademicsProfessor12
Expert 15AcademicsProfessor9

3.2.2 Phase-2: ISM analysis

Warfield introduced ISM in 1974 (Warfield, 1974) to examine context-specific variables (Bhosale and Kant, 2016). A panel of experts determines variable associations, making this technique interpretative (Mathiyazhagan et al., 2013). With experts' input, the ISM technique transforms a complex structure into a hierarchical structural model with a visible and well-defined structure (Sage, 1977). This approach enables the structured development of a directed graph or network, visually representing the intricate contextual relationships among a given set of variables (Malone, 1975). Steps for developing an ISM-based model adopted in this study are based on the work of Warfield (1974), Sage (1977).

3.2.2.1 Development of structural self-interaction matrix (SSIM)

To establish the pairwise relationship among the barriers, responses were taken from the same 15 experts (Please see Table 1). ISM, an expert-driven methodology, is intended to develop a structural relationship rather than a statistical generalization. Hence, the interpretive quality of experts is more crucial than the sample size. Previous ISM base studies (Bhosale and Kant, 2016; Gokarn and Choudhary, 2021; Hu and Bi, 2025; Lima et al., 2025) have also used a limited sample (an expert panel of 8–20). Further, (VAXO) rotation was used to define the relationship between the barriers (i and j), representing barriers in rows and columns, respectively.

  • V: Barrier i will help to achieve barrier j

  • A: Barrier i will be achieved by barrier j

  • X: Barrier i and j will help to achieve each other

  • O: Barrier i and j are unrelated.

Based on these pairwise relationships, the SSIM table was developed for the eight barriers identified as COTTE barriers.

3.2.3 Development of reachability matrix (RM)

The SSIM is reformed into a binary matrix, called the initial reachability matrix. The symbols V, A, X, and O are converted into 1 and 0 as given below

  1. If the entry in the cell (i, j) in the SSIM is V, then the cell (i, j) entry is converted into 1 and the cell (j, i) entry converted into 0 in the initial reachability matrix.

  2. If the entry in the cell (i, j) in the SSIM is A, then the cell (i, j) entry is converted into 0, and the cell (j, i) entry is converted into 1 in the initial reachability matrix.

  3. If the notation in the cell (i, j) in the SSIM is X, then the entry in both the cells (i, j) and (j, i) gets converted into 1 in the initial reachability matrix.

  4. If the entry in the cell (i, j) in the SSIM is O, then the entry in both the cells (i, j) and (j, i) is converted into 0 in the initial reachability matrix.

The final reachability matrix of the barriers is obtained by incorporating the transitivity rule, which states that if a variable A influences B, and B influences the variable C, then A also influences C. Applying the transitivity rule, if a direct relationship exists between two barriers, an indirect link is established through other barriers that share a common relationship with both.

3.2.4 Level partitions

Using the final reachability matrix, the reachability set and antecedent set for each barrier were identified. The reachability set of a specific barrier includes the barrier itself, along with other barriers it may contribute to achieving. Conversely, the antecedent set comprises the barrier itself and other barriers that may aid in achieving it.

3.2.5 Development of ISM-based model

An ISM-based model is developed based on the final reachability matrix and the directed graph of the COTTE barriers. The conceptual inconsistency of the ISM-based model is checked, and necessary modifications are made.

Fuzzy MICMAC analysis is a sophisticated decision-making and analytical method that uses fuzzy logic and MICMAC. It is mostly used to investigate the interdependencies and consequences of numerous variables in complex systems to have a better understanding of their interactions (Hong et al., 2024). Fuzzy MICMAC is commonly used with ISM to improve performance. ISM defines factor structures, whereas fuzzy MICMAC shows their interdependencies. This combination enhances system dynamics understanding (Bashir et al., 2022). By categorizing barriers into dependent, independent, linkage, or autonomous clusters based on their influence and dependence, fuzzy MICMAC analysis helps unravel system complexities by providing a structured approach to understanding and addressing these barriers.

This section outlines the results derived from each method employed to achieve the stated objectives of the study. The findings from each approach are discussed below.

Eight key barriers relevant to the research problem were identified from the selected studies and are summarized in Table 2. A brief description of these eight barriers within the context of the problem is provided in the subsequent subsections.

Table 2

Evidence for identifying representative barriers

First-orderBarrier (second-order)Literature
Lack of uninterrupted internet connectivityTechnological and infrastructural barrier (B1)Akhter et al. (2022), Al-Busaidi et al. (2017), Chisita and Tsabedze (2020), Iyanna et al. (2022), Kwangsawad and Jattamart (2022), Lee et al. (2024), Loo et al. (2024), Nallam et al. (2020), Rahiem (2020), Sedotto et al. (2024), Vidiasova et al. (2022) 
Poor internet connection speed
Infrastructure unavailability
System complexity
Compatibility issues
Device issues
Restricted access
Technology glitches and bugs
Technical problems
Technology anxiety
AffordabilityEconomic affordability barrier (B2)Agarwal et al. (2023), Ali Alryalat et al. (2023), Kumar et al. (2025), Loo et al. (2024), Nandukrishna and Priya (2024), Polisetty et al. (2023), Zhou (2018) 
Increase in subscription fee
Price
Switching Cost
Perceived cost
Value barrier
Internet gaming addictionMental health concern (B3)Dong et al. (2012a, b), Lee et al. (2014), Lin et al. (2015), Park (2017), Scott et al. (2017), Wang and Cheng (2021), Wölfling et al. (2019) 
Gaming disorder
Internet addiction disorder
Smartphone addiction
Stress, anxiety, depression
Lack of multilingual supportLanguage and localization barrier (B4)Bansal et al. (2024), Rainey et al. (2023), Sezgin et al. (2024) 
Language limitations
Unwillingness to adoptSocio-cultural barrier (B5)Al-Busaidi et al. (2017), Al-Dmour et al. (2020), Ali Alryalat et al. (2023), Chaouali et al. (2024), Dang et al. (2022), Lüders and Sundet (2022), MacGregor and Kartiwi (2010), Nabot et al. (2014), Shah et al. (2024) 
Pre-established negative attitudes
Traditional barrier
Image barrier
Personal characteristics
Difficulty in acquiring new skills
Resistance to digital transformation
Perceived riskPrivacy and data security barrier (B6)Abou-Shouk and Eraqi (2015), Chivandi and Sibanda (2018), ElSayad and Mamdouh (2024), Gupta and Mukherjee (2025), Levy et al. (2005), Saxena et al. (2023), Zeba and Ganguli (2016) 
Risk perceptions
Fear of fraud
Insecurity
Lack of security and privacy
Consumer trustTrust and reliability barrier (B7)Becker (2005), Bryła (2018), Chepurna and Rialp Criado (2018), Habib et al. (2025), Mansour (2015), Nallam et al. (2020), Polisetty et al. (2023), Salahshour et al. (2016) 
Question of trust
Lack of trust
Skepticism
Inaccuracy and non-reliability
Ideological barrier
Usage barrierDigital barrier (B8)Akhter et al. (2022), Caputo et al. (2023), Chen and Thio (2021), Cox et al. (2023), ElSayad and Mamdouh (2024), Gan and Sun (2022), Polisetty et al. (2023), Rudolph et al. (2004), Saxena et al. (2023), Sullivan and Koh (2019), Sumalinog (2022), Vuchkovski et al. (2023) 
Lack of technical skills
Lack of digital knowledge
Skill deficiency
Poor usability
Perceived complexity
Insufficient information

4.1.1 Technological and infrastructural barriers (B1)

Technological and infrastructural barriers refer to challenges related to limited access to hardware, software quality, and the overall planning and implementation needed to support digitalization (Iyanna et al., 2022). For rural OTT platforms, 82% of the population has not adopted them (Chacko, 2022). Poor internet access limits OTT viewers' entertainment experience. Technical constraints, including compatibility and system complexity, hinder online adoption (Loo et al., 2024), which can also hinder COTTE. Complex user interfaces, technological challenges, restricted search and navigation options, and poor curation and recommendation systems make it tougher for consumers to utilize the platform easily. Technology glitches typically hinder utilization, including setup, notification, and feature navigation errors. Technical problems include login issues, heavy tablets, and technical errors that slow chatbot performance (Kim et al., 2023), which means that technical errors cause the chatbot to respond more slowly, less reliably, or with poorer quality. Technological anxiety is a significant obstacle to chatbot adoption, stemming from users' fear and hesitation (Kwangsawad and Jattamart, 2022). These factors limit both adoption and user satisfaction, making them essential to address in the context of COTTE. Technology vulnerability refers to the fear of technological failures, including concerns about technological dependence and technology anxiety of OTT platforms (Polisetty et al., 2023).

4.1.2 Economic affordability barriers (B2)

Economic affordability barriers are impediments that hinder individuals from accessing products, services, or opportunities due to higher prices or financial limitations. The barrier of affordability is a difficulty with the Internet, connectivity, and technology costs, which may increase financial strain (Ali Alryalat et al., 2023; Loo et al., 2024). Previous studies have shown that the cost and effort involved in switching act as barriers, making users reluctant to change or adopt new services in areas such as internet banking (Zhou, 2018), online food delivery (Cheng et al., 2025), e-commerce (Ghazali et al., 2016), online hotel booking (Xue and Jo, 2024), online auctions (Li, 2015), and messaging applications (Schreiner and Hess, 2015). Since OTT platforms operate in a similar online environment, it can be inferred that switching costs and effort may also serve as barriers and making viewers reluctant to adopt new platforms, which affects COTTE. Perceived cost plays a significant role, as many users believe that subscribing to these services may not be worth the expense (Nandukrishna and Sridevi, 2024). The value barrier also affects adoption, with potential subscribers questioning whether the content and features justify the price (Polisetty et al., 2023). Additionally, the continuous increase in subscription fees makes it harder for users to afford multiple streaming services (Agarwal et al., 2023). Pricing plays an important role in influencing subscription decisions of OTT platforms (Kumar et al., 2025).These economic challenges discourage many from fully embracing OTT platforms.

4.1.3 Mental health concerns (B3)

Mental health issues include psychological conditions such as addiction disorders, stress, anxiety, and depression, which arise from overutilization of the internet, smartphones, and gaming. Internet gaming addiction (IGA) is often defined as an individual's inability to manage their internet usage, resulting in significant adverse consequences (Lin et al., 2015). Internet addiction (IA) is a broad concept that encompasses excessive involvement in various online activities, including gaming, social networking, chatting, gambling, video or movie streaming, compulsive shopping, and continuous browsing or information searching (Wölfling et al., 2019). It is characterized by a lack of control over internet use, eventually causing problems in mental health, social life, or work (Dong et al., 2012a). In 2024, India observed a 13% annual increase in the time spent on devices, marking the highest year-on-year growth among the top five countries in this category (Sanzgiri, 2025). As technology use grows and people rely more on social media for communication, social interactions decrease, leading to more mental health issues. Easy access, constant connectivity, and information overload can contribute to stress, anxiety, and depression (Scott et al., 2017). Previous studies have found that excessive digital consumption can result in addiction, stress, eye strain, and poor sleep quality (Aykutlu et al., 2024; Deivendran et al., 2025; Kayan, 2025; Nikolic et al., 2023). Consequently, it negatively impacts users' mental health, making many viewers aware of these effects and therefore inclined to limit their usage of OTT platforms.

4.1.4 Language and localization barriers (B4)

A language barrier occurs when people are unable to communicate verbally due to the absence of a shared language. Localization goes beyond mere translation; it involves tailoring a message, product, or game to connect more effectively with different audiences (Xavier, 2024). Hence, a localisation barrier emerges when the company's message and offers do not meet the needs of a broad audience. The language barrier also restricts internet usage, as the majority of online content is in English (Lwoga and Chigona, 2019). A linguistic barrier impedes involvement in e-commerce, complicating individuals' ability to navigate online platforms, comprehend product information, and communicate successfully with sellers and customers in various languages (Al-Dmour et al., 2020). The lack of multilingual support and language limitations present significant barriers for chatbot adoption as well (Bansal et al., 2024; Rainey et al., 2023; Sezgin et al., 2024). Similarly, language can be a hurdle for viewers who watch OTT content but do not understand English. Moreover, there is a possibility of misleading or false information being shared, which could pose risks to viewers (Agarwal et al., 2023).

4.1.5 Socio-cultural barriers (B5)

Socio-cultural barriers arise from differences in social origins, customs, beliefs, and behaviors. Cultural and social variety hinders information clarity, interpretation, and exchange (Soni, 2023). Lack of technical knowledge and awareness of e-commerce benefits (Abou-Shouk and Eraqi, 2015) and low perceived operational benefits and unwillingness to adopt these services are impediments to adoption (Ali Alryalat et al., 2023). These could also act as a barrier to COTTE. Online shoppers are impacted by social variables (Pentz et al., 2020), lack of understanding, cultural issues, and interest as barriers to social media use (Al-Busaidi et al., 2017). Lack of awareness, unethical work, and unpleasant customers also hinder OTT adoption (Agarwal et al., 2023). Unethical work refers to unethical work practices in the form of paying less, exploiting writers, etc. and unpleasant customers refers to other customers who are displeased or unhappy with OTT platforms. Viewers with a general aversion and pre-existing negative attitudes are more inclined to choose traditional entertainment over OTT. The image barrier, caused by stereotyping, slows innovation (Choudhary et al., 2024), which happens when people dislike the brand, industry, or innovation's adverse consequences (Lian and Yen, 2014). The tradition barrier emerges when an innovation disrupts or contradicts a user's cultural norms, with resistance intensifying as the level of conflict increases. These barriers significantly affect the adoption of OTT services (Polisetty et al., 2023) impacting the experience of OTT viewers.

4.1.6 Privacy and data security barriers (B6)

A privacy and data security barrier refers to challenges, regulations, or limitations that prevent the effective protection, collection, or use of personal and sensitive data. Internet security primarily addresses the risks faced by consumers when using credit cards for online purchases, while payment fraud remains a significant threat to online merchants (Loo et al., 2024). Perceived risk refers to the uncertainty about future outcomes that may negatively impact individuals' purchasing decisions, highlighting the need for a secure payment method when ordering expensive products online. Fear of security risks in online transactions hinders its widespread adoption (Ndayizigamiye and Khoase, 2018). The lack of security and privacy in online transactions poses another challenge (Abou-Shouk and Eraqi, 2015). Perceived privacy risk is a key barrier to the adoption of OTT, as consumers worry about the misuse of their personal information. Users fear unauthorized access, data breaches, and misuse of personal information, making them hesitant to engage online (Alqahtani and Issa, 2018). In line with this, worries about privacy and security can disrupt the user experience on OTT platforms. Fear of data breaches, tracking, and unauthorized access may make viewers hesitant to engage with content or share personal information.

4.1.7 Trust and reliability barriers (B7)

Trust and reliability barriers are characterized by a consumer's perceived lack of trust, which affects their decision to make an online purchase and is influenced by their perception (Sesar et al., 2024). Consumer trust is essential for internet users in electronic governance (Becker, 2005), social media (Salahshour et al., 2016) and voice assistants (Nallam et al., 2020). Trust is the expectation of receiving favorable or neutral outcomes based on the anticipated behaviour of another party in a situation where uncertainty exists (Bhattacharya et al., 1998). Likewise, a lack of trust and technological confidence can negatively affect COTTE. When customers value the advantages of a new technology, yet also express concerns about the potential risks involved in its use (Soopramanien, 2011). Ideological barriers hinder OTT adoption, as skeptical viewers doubt the success of OTT services (Polisetty et al., 2023). Insecurity also means doubting technology's dependability and functionality (Parasuraman, 2000). Insecurity increases uncertainty and decreases technology use (Kuo et al., 2013; Parasuraman and Colby, 2014). Users often face issues with inaccurate responses, which can be too vague, incorrect, or unsatisfactory, leading to more confusion than clarity. Inaccuracy and unreliability might also hinder COTTE.

4.1.8 Digital barriers (B8)

The digital barrier is a phenomenon where an individual's success is determined by their engagement in the information revolution (Ling et al., 2020). Consumers with limited technological understanding or app experience may oppose a technology, creating a usage barrier (Polisetty et al., 2023). Lack of technology knowledge, expertise, and abilities hinders online learning, digital transformation (Akhter et al., 2022; Vuchkovski et al., 2023). Online and distant learning have struggled with skill insufficiency (Gan and Sun, 2022; Sumalinog, 2022). Likewise, in the context of OTT platforms, it can also pose a challenge for COTTE. Poor usability can create a hurdle that requires extra effort and determination to overcome (Chen and Thio, 2021). Perceived complexity is when a technology is seen as complicated, requiring more effort to use. As a result, if people find a technology difficult to use, they also view any tasks performed with it as challenging (Sullivan and Koh, 2019). Older persons' unwillingness to change and difficulties learning new skills hinder digital adoption (Xu et al., 2023). Lack of excitement, discomfort, preference for conventional technology, and cynicism or uncertainty about its performance can contribute to passive innovative resistance to new technologies. Resistance to digital transformation is people's reluctance, hesitancy, or rejection to adopting and integrating digital technology (Caputo et al., 2023). OTT users lack information to make purchasing decisions and evaluate service quality (Rudolph et al., 2004). Older audiences may prefer familiar genres such as sitcoms, dramas, and procedurals, which might be less common on OTT platforms (Mathevan, 2024).

4.2.1 SSIM

Based on the results of the established contextual relationships among the identified barriers, an SSIM was constructed as presented in Table 3.

Table 3

Structural self-intersection matrix (SSIM)

CodesList of barriersB1B2B3B4B5B6B7B8
B1Technological and infrastructural barriersVVVVVVV 
B2Economic affordability barrierOOAVVO  
B3Mental health concernOXOOA   
B4Language and localization barrierVOXO    
B5Socio-cultural barrierVAO     
B6Privacy and data security barrierVV      
B7Trust and reliability barrierV       
B8Digital barrier       

4.2.2 Reachability matrix

The initial reachability matrix and the final reachability matrix of the barriers are developed as shown in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.

Table 4

Initial reachability matrix

BarrierB1B2B3B4B5B6B7B8
B111111111
B201011000
B300100010
B400110101
B500001001
B601010111
B700101011
B800000001
Table 5

Final reachability matrix

BarrierB1B2B3B4B5B6B7B8
B111111111
B2011*111*1*1*
B300101*011*
B401*111*11*1
B500001001*
B6011*11*111
B700101*011
B800000001

Note(s): * values obtained by incorporating the transitivity rule

4.2.3 Level partitions

In this study, all eight barriers reached their final levels after five iterations, as presented in Table 6. These five hierarchical levels serve as the foundation for constructing the ISM-based model.

Table 6

Label partition for barriers: iteration I - iteration V

BarrierReachability setAntecedent setIntersection setLevel
Iteration I
B11,2,3,4,5,6,7,811 
B22,3,4,5,6,7,81,2,4,62,4,6 
B33,5,7,81,2,3,4,6,73,7 
B42,3,4,5,6,7,81,2,4,62,4,6 
B55,81,2,3,4,5,6,75 
B62,3,4,5,6,7,81,2,4,62,4,6 
B73,5,7,81,2,3,4,6,73,7 
B881,2,3,4,5,6,7,88I
Iteration II
B11,2,3,4,5,6,711 
B22,3,4,5,6,71,2,4,62,4,6 
B33,5,71,2,3,4,6,73,7 
B42,3,4,5,6,71,2,4,62,4,6 
B551,2,3,4,5,6,75II
B62,3,4,5,6,71,2,4,62,4,6 
B73,5,71,2,3,4,6,73,7 
Iteration III
B11,2,3,4,6,711 
B22,3,4,6,71,2,4,62,4,6 
B33,71,2,3,4,6,73,7III
B42,4,61,2,4,62,4,6 
B62,4,62,4,62,4,6 
B73,71,2,3,4,6,73,7III
Iteration IV 
B11,2,4,611 
B22,4,61,2,4,62,4,6IV
B42,4,61,2,4,62,4,6IV
B62,4,62,4,62,4,6IV
Iteration V 
B1111V

4.2.4 ISM-based model

The hierarchical model is constructed based on the final reachability matrix and the directed graph of COTTE barriers, as illustrated in Figure 3. In this model, the first-level barrier (Level I) is placed at the top of the digraph, followed by the second-level barriers positioned directly below it. Likewise, other barriers are arranged hierarchically according to their respective levels in the partitioning process until the bottom-level barrier (Level V) is placed at the lowest position in the digraph. This study's ISM model consists of five hierarchical levels, ranging from Level I to Level V.

Figure 3
A hierarchical diagram of barriers from technological to digital barriers with interconnections.The diagram displays labeled rectangular boxes connected by directional arrows. The layout is hierarchical from bottom to top with additional horizontal relationships. At the bottom of the diagram is “Technological and Infrastructural Barriers (B 1)”. Above this, three boxes are aligned horizontally: “Economic Affordability Barriers (B 2)” on the left, “Language and Localization Barriers (B 4)” in the center, and “Privacy and Data Security Barriers (B 6)” on the right. An upward arrow connects “Technological and Infrastructural Barriers (B 1)” to “Language and Localization Barriers (B 4)”. “Economic Affordability Barriers (B 2)” connects to “Language and Localization Barriers (B 4)” with a double-headed horizontal arrow. “Privacy and Data Security Barriers (B 6)” also connects to “Language and Localization Barriers (B 4)” with a double-headed horizontal arrow. Above this level, two boxes are shown: “Mental Health Concerns (B 3)” on the left and “Trust and reliability Barriers (B 7)” on the right. “Economic Affordability Barriers (B 2)”, “Language and Localization Barriers (B 4)”, and “Privacy and Data Security Barriers (B 6)” connect upward to both “Mental Health Concerns (B 3)” and “Trust and reliability Barriers (B 7)”. Additionally, there is a bidirectional horizontal connection between “Mental Health Concerns (B 3)” and “Trust and reliability Barriers (B 7)”. Above these, “Socio- Cultural Barriers (B 5)” is positioned centrally. Arrows from both “Mental Health Concerns (B 3)” and “Trust and reliability Barriers (B 7)” point upward to “Socio- Cultural Barriers (B 5)”. At the top of the diagram is “Digital Barriers (B 8)”. An upward arrow connects “Socio- Cultural Barriers (B 5)” to “Digital Barriers (B 8)”.

ISM-based model for barriers to COTTE

Figure 3
A hierarchical diagram of barriers from technological to digital barriers with interconnections.The diagram displays labeled rectangular boxes connected by directional arrows. The layout is hierarchical from bottom to top with additional horizontal relationships. At the bottom of the diagram is “Technological and Infrastructural Barriers (B 1)”. Above this, three boxes are aligned horizontally: “Economic Affordability Barriers (B 2)” on the left, “Language and Localization Barriers (B 4)” in the center, and “Privacy and Data Security Barriers (B 6)” on the right. An upward arrow connects “Technological and Infrastructural Barriers (B 1)” to “Language and Localization Barriers (B 4)”. “Economic Affordability Barriers (B 2)” connects to “Language and Localization Barriers (B 4)” with a double-headed horizontal arrow. “Privacy and Data Security Barriers (B 6)” also connects to “Language and Localization Barriers (B 4)” with a double-headed horizontal arrow. Above this level, two boxes are shown: “Mental Health Concerns (B 3)” on the left and “Trust and reliability Barriers (B 7)” on the right. “Economic Affordability Barriers (B 2)”, “Language and Localization Barriers (B 4)”, and “Privacy and Data Security Barriers (B 6)” connect upward to both “Mental Health Concerns (B 3)” and “Trust and reliability Barriers (B 7)”. Additionally, there is a bidirectional horizontal connection between “Mental Health Concerns (B 3)” and “Trust and reliability Barriers (B 7)”. Above these, “Socio- Cultural Barriers (B 5)” is positioned centrally. Arrows from both “Mental Health Concerns (B 3)” and “Trust and reliability Barriers (B 7)” point upward to “Socio- Cultural Barriers (B 5)”. At the top of the diagram is “Digital Barriers (B 8)”. An upward arrow connects “Socio- Cultural Barriers (B 5)” to “Digital Barriers (B 8)”.

ISM-based model for barriers to COTTE

Close modal

Fuzzy MICMAC analysis uses fuzzy set theory (FST) to increase sensitivity over binary connections (0, 1) (Gorane and Kant, 2013). FMICMAC adds barrier interaction input. FMICMAC is more sensitive than conventional MICMAC analysis, but it is especially useful when identifying interaction possibilities would take extensive resources (Saxena et al., 1990). This analysis uses the initial reachability matrix to calculate the direct relationship matrix. Further, it is improved by incorporating the possibility of interactions between the barriers. Following conversion to a fuzzy direct relationship matrix, it becomes input for FMICMAC analysis. Fuzzy multiplication stabilizes matrices instead of Boolean multiplication.

4.3.1 Binary direct relationship matrix

A binary direct relationship matrix (BDRM) is constructed by analysing the direct relationships among barriers in the initial reachability matrix, as shown in Table 5. In this process, all non-zero values on the matrix's diagonal are converted to zero to form the BDRM, as presented in Table 7.

Table 7

Binary direct relationship matrix

Possibility of reachabilityNoNegligibleLowMediumVery highFull
Numerical value00.10.50.70.91

4.3.2 Fuzzy direct relationship matrix

To enhance the analysis, the BDRM is further transformed into a fuzzy direct relationship matrix (FDRM) by incorporating the possibility of reachability rather than just direct reachability. For this, a scale ranging from 0 to 1, as shown in Table 5, is used. The relationship values between the two barriers are then updated based on inputs from academicians and industry experts. The resulting table is referred to as the fuzzy direct relationship matrix (FDRM), as presented in Table 8.

Table 8

Fuzzy direct relationship matrix

B1B2B3B4B5B6B7B8
B110.90.910.90.910.9
B201010.9000
B30010000.70
B4000.9100.901
B500001000.5
B600.700.9010.70.7
B7000.700.9011
B800000001

4.3.3 Fuzzy indirect relationship analysis

FDRM is the foundational matrix for finding fuzzy indirect COTTE barrier relationships. The FDRM is multiplied by itself to find indirect relationships (Nida et al., 2024). This multiplication uses fuzzy matrix multiplication (Kandasamy and Smarandache, 2007). Fuzzy matrix multiplication extends Boolean matrix multiplication by allowing for fuzzy values. In FST, the product of two fuzzy matrices results in another fuzzy matrix. Multiplication follows the rule:

The stabilized matrix (Table 9) shows the fuzzy indirect relationships between barriers.

Table 9

Fuzzy MICMAC stabilized matrix

B1B2B3B4B5B6B7B8Driving power
B110.90.910.90.9117.6
B2010.910.90.9015.7
B300100.700.70.73.1
B400.70.9100.90.715.2
B500001000.71.7
B600.70.90.90.710.70.95.8
B7000.700.90113.6
B8000000011
Dependence Power115.33.95.13.74.17.333.7

Fuzzy MICMAC analysis grouped all eight barriers into different groups based on their contextual relationships. Driving power indicates a barrier's capacity to affect and intensify others, whereas dependence power indicates the extent to which others influence it. Based on their values, these eight barriers are grouped into autonomous, dependent, linkage, and independent categories. The driving power is determined by summing the rows in Table 9, while the dependence power is calculated by summing the columns. These values are plotted on a graph using dependence as the x-axis and driving power as the y-axis, as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4
A graph shows four clusters plotting barriers based on driving power and dependence power.The horizontal axis is labeled “Dependence power”, ranging from 0 to 8 in increments of 1. The vertical axis is labeled “Driving power”, ranging from 0 to 8 in increments of 1. The plot is divided into four quadrants labeled “Cluster 1”, “Cluster 2”, “Cluster 3”, and “Cluster 4”. In the upper left quadrant labeled “Cluster 4”, the points include “B 1: 1, 7.6” and “B 2: 1, 5.7”. These points have low dependence power and high driving power. Also in the upper region near the center are “B 6: 3.7, 5.8” and “B 4: 3.9, 5.2”, positioned close to the boundary between Cluster 4 and Cluster 3. In the upper right quadrant labeled “Cluster 3”, no barrier points are located. In the lower left quadrant labeled “Cluster 1”, there are no barrier points, indicating low driving power and low dependence power. In the lower right quadrant labeled “Cluster 2”, several points are shown including “B 7: 4.1, 3.6”, “B 3: 5.3, 3.1”, “B 5: 5.1, 1.7”, and “B 8: 7.3, 1”. These points represent barriers with high dependence power and low driving power. The diagram shows how different barriers labeled B1 through B8 are distributed across clusters based on their driving and dependence power values.

Driving and dependence power diagram

Figure 4
A graph shows four clusters plotting barriers based on driving power and dependence power.The horizontal axis is labeled “Dependence power”, ranging from 0 to 8 in increments of 1. The vertical axis is labeled “Driving power”, ranging from 0 to 8 in increments of 1. The plot is divided into four quadrants labeled “Cluster 1”, “Cluster 2”, “Cluster 3”, and “Cluster 4”. In the upper left quadrant labeled “Cluster 4”, the points include “B 1: 1, 7.6” and “B 2: 1, 5.7”. These points have low dependence power and high driving power. Also in the upper region near the center are “B 6: 3.7, 5.8” and “B 4: 3.9, 5.2”, positioned close to the boundary between Cluster 4 and Cluster 3. In the upper right quadrant labeled “Cluster 3”, no barrier points are located. In the lower left quadrant labeled “Cluster 1”, there are no barrier points, indicating low driving power and low dependence power. In the lower right quadrant labeled “Cluster 2”, several points are shown including “B 7: 4.1, 3.6”, “B 3: 5.3, 3.1”, “B 5: 5.1, 1.7”, and “B 8: 7.3, 1”. These points represent barriers with high dependence power and low driving power. The diagram shows how different barriers labeled B1 through B8 are distributed across clusters based on their driving and dependence power values.

Driving and dependence power diagram

Close modal

Eight relevant barriers were identified through a combination of literature review and expert consultations. The ISM technique was then applied to construct a structured hierarchical model illustrating the interrelationships among the identified barriers. Figure 3 shows that the technological and infrastructural barriers (B1) are at the highest level in this hierarchy, as they have strong driving power but low dependence power, making them the most important barrier. They have the potential to influence the remaining barriers like economic affordability barriers (B2), language and localization barriers (B4), and privacy and data security barriers (B6). These three barriers lead to the other barriers, such as mental health concerns (B3) and trust and reliability barriers (B7). Both these barriers, in return impact the socio-cultural barriers (B5). At the top of the ISM hierarchy are the digital barriers (B8), with the lowest driving power and maximum dependence power. All the remaining barriers affect digital barriers directly or indirectly.

These findings provide valuable insights for the OTT industry, highlighting key barriers that influence user experience and adoption. Among these, technological and infrastructural barriers stand out as the most significant, as they impact other barriers. Service providers must prioritize addressing technical issues such as system glitches, software bugs, and infrastructure-related shortcomings to ensure a seamless viewing experience. Additionally, the high cost of adopting new technology creates economic affordability barriers, making it difficult for some users to access OTT platforms. If content is not user-friendly or fails to adapt to diverse audiences, it leads to language and localization barriers, limiting engagement across different demographics. Moreover, privacy and data security barriers play a crucial role in user trust—when individuals feel unsafe using a platform, they hesitate to share sensitive information such as credit card details and personal data, further intensifying trust and reliability issues. A lack of confidence in platform security can cause users to fear potential data breaches or loss of vital information, reinforcing skepticism and reducing engagement. Meanwhile, excessive OTT usage, such as binge-watching, can contribute to addiction, anxiety, and other mental health concerns. When users begin to perceive these platforms as having a negative impact on their well-being, it fosters socio-cultural barriers, making them less inclined to engage with such services. The most dependent barrier among all is the digital barrier, which arises when users lack IT skills or awareness of the benefits of OTT services. Limited digital literacy can hinder individuals from effectively navigating these platforms, reducing their ability to fully engage with available content and services. Addressing these interconnected challenges is essential for enhancing user experience, building trust, and ensuring the continued growth of the OTT industry. To improve viewer satisfaction, OTT service providers must tackle these barriers and comprehend their interrelationships, as they greatly influence the overall consumer experience.

Fuzzy MICMAC analysis was used to categorize the eight barriers into different groups based on their contextual relationships. Based on this analysis, the eight barriers are categorized into four groups: autonomous barriers, dependent barriers, linkage barriers, and independent barriers.

Cluster I: Autonomous barriers. Barriers located in the first quadrant exhibit weak driving and dependence power and are referred to as autonomous barriers. When assessing COTTE barriers, no autonomous barriers are identified. These barriers are relatively isolated from the system, resulting in less impact. Their absence in this study suggests that all the considered barriers play a significant role within the system. OTT service providers cannot ignore all eight barriers while providing a seamless experience to viewers.

Cluster II: Dependent barriers. Barriers situated in the second quadrant possess weak driving power but strong dependence power and are classified as dependent barriers. The dependent barriers identified in quadrant II include mental health concerns (B3), socio-cultural barriers (B5), trust and reliability barriers (B7), and digital barriers (B8). Given their weak driving power and strong dependence power, service providers should thoroughly examine these barriers, as they hinder a seamless viewing experience.

Cluster III: Linkage barriers. The third quadrant of Figure 4 includes barriers with both strong driving and dependence power, referred to as linkage barriers. However, in this study, no barriers were identified as linkage barriers in quadrant III, meaning none exhibit both strong driving and dependence power. This suggests that all the barriers impacting COTTE in this study are stable in nature.

Cluster IV: Independent barriers. These barriers possess strong driving power but weak dependence power. Positioned in the fourth quadrant, they are referred to as independent barriers. In this study, barriers present in quadrant IV are technological and infrastructural barriers (B1), economic affordability barriers (B2), language and localization barriers (B4), and privacy and data security barriers (B6). These barriers possess strong driving power and weak dependence power, making them critical barriers. Service providers should make a strategy by considering these barriers to make the customer experience more comfortable and enjoyable. These barriers are also important as they influence all the dependent barriers, which are placed in the second quadrant. The OTT industry needs to explore diverse economic models beyond the conventional revenue sources of advertising and subscriptions to build a sustainable business (Mani, 2025).

This study includes both theoretical contributions and managerial implications.

5.1.1 Theoretical contribution

The current study significantly contributes to the existing literature on customer experience in OTT platforms. First, the current study has significantly extended the scope of ongoing empirical studies of customer experience literature by identifying barriers to COTTE. Previous studies often emphasized service quality, personalization, or content richness, while this further adds insights on the inhibiting factors. This adds a new dimension to the existing customer experience literature by integrating negative determinants into the framework. Second, the present study extends existing literature by employing ISM to establish the interrelationships among identified barriers. By mapping the hierarchical interdependencies across economic, technological, psychological, and socio-cultural dimensions, the study offers a holistic theoretical understanding of the barriers to COTTE. It reflects that consumer experience in OTT is shaped by an ecosystem of structural, cultural, and individual-level barriers. Third, the current study makes a valuable contribution to the existing literature by the use of Fuzzy MICMAC, which results in the categorization that contributes to theoretical knowledge by classifying them into independent, dependent, and linkage barriers in the OTT context.

5.1.2 Managerial implications

The study findings are valuable for different stakeholders, including practitioners, OTT service providers, and policymakers. First, as the technological and infrastructural barriers are the most significant, possessing strong driving power and influencing all other barriers, service providers could proactively address system glitches, software bugs, and infrastructure-related shortcomings to ensure a seamless and reliable viewing experience. Second, economic affordability barriers highlight the need for more inclusive pricing strategies. Managers could explore tiered subscription plans, ad-supported free versions, student discounts, and regional pricing to make OTT services accessible to a broader audience, especially in price-sensitive markets. Third, to overcome language and localization barriers, OTT service providers can ensure user-friendly content that is adapted to diverse audiences. This means investing in high-quality multi-language support (subtitles, dubbing), region-specific content, and designing user interfaces that are intuitive and localized for specific demographics to maximize engagement. Fourth, service providers could treat privacy and data security barriers as critical independent barriers that directly impact user trust and reliability. Management could implement robust security measures, clearly communicate data usage policies, and build transparent systems to reassure users about the safety of their sensitive personal information (like credit card details) to mitigate hesitancy in platform engagement. Fifth, since digital barriers have the highest dependence, managers could launch awareness campaigns or user-friendly tutorials to help less tech-savvy users navigate OTT platforms effectively. Simplified interfaces and AI-driven recommendations can improve accessibility and retention. Sixth, managers could recognize the potential negative effects of excessive screen time and binge-watching, i.e. mental health concerns. Introducing responsible-viewing features—like watch-time reminders or curated content for relaxation—can promote healthier viewing habits and strengthen the platform's reputation for user well-being. Seventh, trust and socio-cultural barriers indicate that platforms could maintain credibility through transparent operations, culturally sensitive content, and ethical advertising. Collaborating with local creators and respecting cultural norms can enhance emotional connection and brand acceptance. Lastly, the absence of linkage barriers suggests a stable barrier structure. Service providers could maintain this stability by focusing on the independent barriers, as they are the primary drivers. Continuously monitoring these key drivers ensures the overall system does not shift, which could introduce highly volatile linkage barriers.

This study develops a comprehensive framework by identifying and analysing key barriers that disrupt a smooth and effortless OTT viewing experience. After reviewing the existing literature, relevant barriers were identified. Further, ISM and fuzzy MICMAC techniques were applied to analyze and reveal the interconnections among them. In this effort, eight barriers to COTTE have been identified through SLR and content analysis. The ISM model (Figure 3) provides a hierarchical framework for service providers to prioritize actions and ensure a seamless experience. Meanwhile, fuzzy MICMAC analysis categorizes barriers into four distinct groups based on their driving and dependence power (Figure 4), offering insights for practitioners to understand the nature of viewer challenges. The study's findings will help service providers enhance customer experience and provide valuable academic insights into related issues.

This study has several limitations, which create opportunities for further investigation in the future. Firstly, the research involved 15 experts from academia and industry, which restricts its scope. Future studies could expand the expert pool by including additional stakeholders such as content creators, technology providers, and distributors to enhance exposure and credibility. Secondly, while conducting the systematic literature review and content analysis, some barriers may have been overlooked due to publication bias, database limitations, or the dynamic evolution of OTT platforms. Future research could expand the scope of database searches to include a broader range of studies for a more comprehensive analysis. Additionally, the model used in this study lacks statistical validation, so future studies could enhance its robustness and generalizability by employing statistical methods like confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) or structural equation modelling (SEM). Future research can employ CFA and SEM to empirically validate and strengthen the hierarchical framework derived from expert judgment. Specifically, CFA can be used to test the reliability and construct validity of the identified barriers, ensuring that the proposed dimensions of COTTE are statistically sound. Subsequently, SEM can be applied to examine the causal relationships among these barriers, thereby providing empirical confirmation of the hierarchical structure revealed through ISM and FMICMAC.

Abou-Shouk
,
M.
and
Eraqi
,
M.I.
(
2015
), “
Perceived barriers to e-commerce adoption in SMEs in developing countries: the case of travel agents in Egypt
”,
International Journal of Services and Operations Management
, Vol. 
21
No. 
3
, pp. 
332
-
353
, doi: .
Agarwal
,
R.
,
Mehrotra
,
A.
,
Sharma
,
V.
,
Papa
,
A.
and
Malibari
,
A.
(
2023
), “
Over-the-top (OTT) retailing in the post pandemic world. Unveiling consumer drivers and barriers using a qualitative study
”,
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
, Vol. 
75
 
August
, 103529, doi: .
Ahmad
,
F.
,
Mustafa
,
K.
,
Hamid
,
S.A.R.
,
Khawaja
,
K.F.
,
Zada
,
S.
,
Jamil
,
S.
,
Qaisar
,
M.N.
,
Vega-Muñoz
,
A.
,
Contreras-Barraza
,
N.
and
Anwer
,
N.
(
2022
), “
Online customer experience leads to loyalty via customer engagement: moderating role of value Co-creation
”,
Frontiers in Psychology
, Vol. 
13
 
July
, pp. 
1
-
15
, doi: .
Akhter
,
H.
,
Abdul Rahman
,
A.A.
,
Jafrin
,
N.
,
Mohammad Saif
,
A.N.
,
Esha
,
B.H.
and
Mostafa
,
R.
(
2022
), “
Investigating the barriers that intensify undergraduates’ unwillingness to online learning during COVID-19: a study on public universities in a developing country
”,
Cogent Education
, Vol. 
9
No. 
1
, doi: .
Al-Busaidi
,
K.A.
,
Ragsdell
,
G.
and
Dawson
,
R.
(
2017
), “
Barriers and benefits of using social networking sites versus face-to-face meetings for sharing knowledge in professional societies
”,
International Journal of Business Information Systems
, Vol. 
25
No. 
2
, pp. 
145
-
164
, doi: .
Al-Dmour
,
R.
,
Abuhashesh
,
M.
,
Zoubi
,
G.
and
Amin
,
E.A.
(
2020
), “
Perceived barriers hindering the jordanian smes operating in the food and beverage industry from engaging in E-commerce: an empirical study
”,
Jordan Journal of Business Administration
, Vol. 
16
No. 
2
, pp. 
365
-
384
, doi: .
Ali Alryalat
,
M.A.
,
Alryalat
,
H.
,
Alhamzi
,
K.H.M.
and
Sharma
,
A.
(
2023
), “
Perceived barriers to business-to-government (B2G) E-commerce adoption: the case of government E-marketplace (GeM) portal in India
”,
International Journal of Electronic Government Research
, Vol. 
19
No. 
1
, pp. 
1
-
19
, doi: .
Alqahtani
,
S.
and
Issa
,
T.
(
2018
), “
Barriers to the adoption of social networking sites in Saudi Arabia's higher education
”,
Behaviour and Information Technology
, Vol. 
37
Nos
10-11
, pp. 
1072
-
1082
, doi: .
Alsharif
,
A.H.
,
Salleh
,
N.Z.M.
and
Baharun
,
R.
(
2021
), “
Neuromarketing: marketing research in the new millennium
”,
Neuroscience Research Notes
, Vol. 
4
No. 
3
, pp. 
27
-
35
, doi: .
Aykutlu
,
M.Ş.
,
Aykutlu
,
H.C.
,
Özveren
,
M.
and
Garip
,
R.
(
2024
), “
Digital media use and its effects on digital eye strain and sleep quality in adolescents: a new emerging epidemic?
”,
PLoS One
, Vol. 
19
No. 
12
, e0314390, doi: .
Bansal
,
C.
,
Kumar
,
K.
,
Goel
,
R.
and
Sharma
,
A.
(
2024
), “
Analysis of barriers to AI banking chatbot adoption in India: an ISM and MICMAC approach
”,
Issues in Information Systems
, Vol. 
25
No. 
4
, pp. 
417
-
441
, doi: .
Bashir
,
H.
,
Hamid
,
S.A.K.
,
Ojiako
,
U.
,
Haridy
,
S.
and
Shamsuzzaman
,
M.
(
2022
), “
An integrated ISM-fuzzy MICMAC approach for modeling and analyzing information flows among product development project activities
”,
2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences, ASET 2022
,
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
, doi: .
Becker
,
S.A.
(
2005
), “
Potential trust barriers in US state e-government privacy policies
”,
Electronic Government
, Vol. 
2
No. 
3
, pp. 
334
-
352
, doi: .
Becker
,
L.
and
Jaakkola
,
E.
(
2020
), “
Customer experience: fundamental premises and implications for research
”,
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
, Vol. 
48
No. 
4
, pp. 
630
-
648
, doi: .
Bhattacharya
,
R.
,
Devinney
,
T.M.
and
Pillutla
,
M.M.
(
1998
), “
A formal model of trust based on outcomes
”,
Academy of Management Review
, Vol. 
23
No. 
3
, pp. 
459
-
472
, doi: .
Bhattacharyya
,
S.S.
,
Goswami
,
S.
,
Mehta
,
R.
and
Nayak
,
B.
(
2021
), “
Examining the factors influencing adoption of over the top (OTT) services among Indian consumers
”,
Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
, Vol. 
ahead-of-print
No. 
ahead-of-print
, doi: .
Bhosale
,
V.A.
and
Kant
,
R.
(
2016
), “
An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for modelling the supply chain knowledge flow enablers
”,
International Journal of Production Research
, Vol. 
54
No. 
24
, pp. 
7374
-
7399
, doi: .
Briner
,
R.B.
,
Denyer
,
D.
and
Rousseau
,
D.M.
(
2009
), “
Evidence-based management: concept cleanup time?
”,
Academy of Management Perspectives
, Vol. 
23
No. 
4
, pp.
19
-
32
, doi: .
Bryła
,
P.
(
2018
), “
Organic food online shopping in Poland
”,
British Food Journal
, Vol. 
120
No. 
5
, pp. 
1015
-
1027
, doi: .
Caputo
,
F.
,
Cillo
,
V.
,
Fiano
,
F.
,
Pironti
,
M.
and
Romano
,
M.
(
2023
), “
Building T-shaped professionals for mastering digital transformation
”,
Journal of Business Research
, Vol. 
154
, 113309, doi: .
Carey
,
R.
(
2023
), “
Customer experience and digital transformation: strategies for success | Five9
”,
Five9, 10 November, available at:
 https://www.five9.com/blog/customer-experience-and-digital-transformation-strategies-success (
accessed
 16 April 2025).
Chacko
,
B.
(
2022
), “
At 26%, rural areas witness higher growth in OTT audience in 2022
”.
Chakraborty
,
D.
,
Siddiqui
,
M.
,
Siddiqui
,
A.
,
Paul
,
J.
,
Dash
,
G.
and
Mas
,
F.D.
(
2023
), “
Watching is valuable: consumer views – content consumption on OTT platforms
”,
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
, Vol. 
70
No. 
2023
, pp. 
0969
-
6989
, doi: .
Chaouali
,
W.
,
Souiden
,
N.
,
Aloui
,
N.
,
Ben Dahmane Mouelhi
,
N.
,
Woodside
,
A.G.
and
Ben Abdelaziz
,
F.
(
2024
), “
Roles of barriers and gender in explaining consumers' chatbot resistance in banking: a fuzzy approach
”,
International Journal of Bank Marketing
, Vol. 
42
No. 
7
, pp. 
1867
-
1887
, doi: .
Chen
,
A.T.Y.
and
Thio
,
K.W.
(
2021
), “
Exploring the drivers and barriers to uptake for digital contact tracing
”,
Social Sciences and Humanities Open
, Vol. 
4
No. 
1
, 100212, doi: .
Cheng
,
F.F.
,
Hsu
,
M.H.
and
Wu
,
C.S.
(
2025
), “
Key factors driving reuse intention on online food delivery platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic
”,
British Food Journal
, Vol. 
127
No. 
12
, pp. 
1
-
19
, doi: .
Chepurna
,
M.
and
Rialp Criado
,
J.
(
2018
), “
Identification of barriers to co-create on-line: the perspectives of customers and companies
”,
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
, Vol. 
12
No. 
4
, pp. 
452
-
471
, doi: .
Chisita
,
C.T.
and
Tsabedze
,
V.W.
(
2020
), “
Massive open online courses (MOOCs): a tool for intercontinental collaboration in archives and records management education in Eswatini
”,
Records Management Journal
, Vol. 
31
No. 
2
, pp. 
158
-
175
, doi: .
Chivandi
,
A.
and
Sibanda
,
F.
(
2018
), “
An investigation of e-commerce adoption inhibitors in the Tourism industry: a Zimbabwe National Parks Perspective
”,
African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure
, Vol. 
7
No. 
3
, pp. 
1
-
15
.
Choudhary
,
S.
,
Kaushik
,
N.
,
Sivathanu
,
B.
and
Rana
,
N.P.
(
2024
), “
Assessing factors influencing customers' adoption of AI-based voice assistants
”,
Journal of Computer Information Systems
, Vol. 
65
No. 
5
, pp. 
592
-
609
, doi: .
Cox
,
J.G.
,
Chen
,
L.Y.
and
Okatch
,
H.
(
2023
), “
Interest in and barriers to online ESOL instruction for adults during and beyond COVID‐19: exploring relationships with sociodemographics and English proficiency
”,
TESOL Journal
, Vol. 
15
No. 
2
, e778, doi: .
Dang
,
A.
,
Khanra
,
S.
and
Kagzi
,
M.
(
2022
), “
Barriers towards the continued usage of massive open online courses: a case study in India
”,
International Journal of Management in Education
, Vol. 
20
No. 
1
, 100562, doi: .
Dasgupta
,
S.
and
Priya
,
G.
(
2019
), “
Understanding adoption factors of over-the-top video services among millennial consumers
”,
International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology
, Vol. 
10
No. 
1
, pp. 
61
-
71
.
Deivendran
,
G.
,
Kanagaraj
,
T.S.
,
Leelabai
,
B.S.
,
Kannan
,
P.
,
Srinivasan
,
Y.
,
Ayyavoo
,
S.
and
Periasamy
,
P.
(
2025
), “
Impact of excessive screen time on sleep quality and sleep disturbances among young adults: a cross-sectional study
”,
Journal of Pharmacy and BioAllied Sciences
, Vol. 
17
No. 
2
, pp. 
53
-
55
, doi: .
Dong
,
G.
,
DeVito
,
E.E.
,
Du
,
X.
and
Cui
,
Z.
(
2012a
), “
Impaired inhibitory control in ‘internet addiction disorder’: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study
”,
Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging
, Vol. 
203
Nos
2-3
, pp. 
153
-
158
, doi: .
Dong
,
G.
,
Huang
,
J.
and
Du
,
X.
(
2012b
), “
Alterations in regional homogeneity of resting-state brain activity in internet gaming addicts
”,
Behavioral and Brain Functions
, Vol. 
8
No. 
1
, p.
1
, doi: .
ElSayad
,
G.
and
Mamdouh
,
H.
(
2024
), “
Are young adult consumers ready to be intelligent shoppers? The importance of perceived trust and the usefulness of AI-powered retail platforms in shaping purchase intention
”,
Young Consumers
, Vol. 
25
No. 
6
, pp. 
969
-
989
, doi: .
FCC
(
2013
),
Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition In the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming
,
Federal Communications Commission
,
Washington, DC
.
Gan
,
I.
and
Sun
,
R.
(
2022
), “
Digital barriers and individual coping behaviors in distance education during COVID-19
”,
International Journal of Knowledge Management
, Vol. 
18
No. 
1
, pp. 
1
-
15
, doi: .
Ghatak
,
R.R.
(
2024
), “
Prioritising the barriers of omni-channel retailing implementation: an emerging market perspective
”,
International Journal of Business and Systems Research
, Vol. 
18
No. 
4
, pp. 
307
-
336
, doi: .
Ghazali
,
E.
,
Nguyen
,
B.
,
Mutum
,
D.S.
and
Mohd-Any
,
A.A.
(
2016
), “
Constructing online switching barriers: examining the effects of switching costs and alternative attractiveness on e-store loyalty in online pure-play retailers
”,
Electronic Markets
, Vol. 
26
No. 
2
, pp. 
157
-
171
, doi: .
Gokarn
,
S.
and
Choudhary
,
A.
(
2021
), “
Modeling the key factors influencing the reduction of food loss and waste in fresh produce supply chains
”,
Journal of Environmental Management
, Vol. 
294
, 113063, doi: .
Gorane
,
S.J.
and
Kant
,
R.
(
2013
), “
Modelling the SCM enablers: an integrated ISM-fuzzy MICMAC approach
”,
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
, Vol. 
25
No. 
2
, pp. 
263
-
286
, doi: .
Gulfraz
,
M.B.
,
Sufyan
,
M.
,
Mustak
,
M.
,
Salminen
,
J.
and
Srivastava
,
D.K.
(
2022
), “
Understanding the impact of online customers' shopping experience on online impulsive buying: a study on two leading E-commerce platforms
”,
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
, Vol. 
68
 
April
, 103000, doi: .
Gupta
,
S.A.
and
Mukherjee
,
J.
(
2025
), “
Exploring drivers of customer engagement with voice interface in E-retail
”,
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
, Vol. 
53
No. 
4
, pp. 
297
-
311
, doi: .
Gupta
,
G.
and
Singharia
,
K.
(
2021
), “
Consumption of OTT media streaming in COVID-19 lockdown: insights from PLS analysis
”,
Vision
, Vol. 
25
No. 
1
, pp. 
36
-
46
, doi: .
Habib
,
M.D.
,
Attri
,
R.
,
Salam
,
M.A.
and
Yaqub
,
M.Z.
(
2025
), “
Retail consumers' conundrum: an in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots
”,
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
, Vol. 
82
No. 
September 2024
, 104147, doi: .
Harris
,
R.
,
Harris
,
K.
and
Baron
,
S.
(
2003
), “
Theatrical service experiences: dramatic script development with employees
”,
International Journal of Service Industry Management
, Vol. 
14
No. 
2
, pp. 
184
-
199
, doi: .
Hong
,
J.
,
Quan
,
Y.
,
Tong
,
X.
and
Lau
,
K.H.
(
2024
), “
A hybrid ISM and fuzzy MICMAC approach to modeling risk analysis of imported fresh food supply chain
”,
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
, Vol. 
39
No. 
2
, pp. 
124
-
141
, doi: .
Hu
,
X.
and
Bi
,
H.
(
2025
), “
Factors influencing science teachers' professional development: a cultural-historical activity theory perspective
”,
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
, Vol. 
62
No. 
7
, pp. 
1764
-
1794
, doi: .
Iyanna
,
S.
,
Kaur
,
P.
,
Ractham
,
P.
,
Talwar
,
S.
and
Najmul Islam
,
A.K.M.
(
2022
), “
Digital transformation of healthcare sector. What is impeding adoption and continued usage of technology-driven innovations by end-users?
”,
Journal of Business Research
, Vol. 
153
 
July
, pp. 
150
-
161
, doi: .
Kakkar
,
A.
and
Kakkar
,
R.
(
2018
), “
Factors leading to adoption of video on demand service: an exploratory study
”,
International Journal of Business and Globalisation
, Vol. 
21
No. 
4
, pp. 
505
-
516
, doi: .
Kalra
,
N.
,
Deshwal
,
P.
,
Gokarn
,
S.
and
Kushwah
,
S.
(
2024
), “
Antecedents and outcomes of customer over-the-top experience: a systematic literature review
”,
IIMT Journal of Management
, Vol. 
1
No. 
1
, pp. 
47
-
87
, doi: .
Kamoonpuri
,
S.Z.
and
Sengar
,
A.
(
2023
), “
Hi, May AI help you? An analysis of the barriers impeding the implementation and use of artificial intelligence-enabled virtual assistants in retail
”,
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
, Vol. 
72
, 103258, doi: .
Kandasamy
,
W.B.V.
and
Smarandache
,
F.
(
2007
), “Elementary fuzzy matrix theory and models for social scientists”,
arXiv
,
available at
: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0702144
Kaur
,
P.
,
Dhir
,
A.
,
Ray
,
A.
,
Bala
,
P.K.
and
Khalil
,
A.
(
2021
), “
Innovation resistance theory perspective on the use of food delivery applications
”,
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
, Vol. 
34
No. 
6
, pp. 
1746
-
1768
, doi: .
Kayan
,
F.
(
2025
), “
The modern dilemma exploring the boundaries of smartphone overuse and dependency
”, doi: ,
available at:
 Https://Services.Igi-Global.Com/Resolvedoi/Resolve.Aspx?Doi=10.4018/979-8-3373-1957-5.Ch012
Kim
,
M.S.
,
Kim
,
E.
,
Hwang
,
S.Y.
,
Kim
,
J.
and
Kim
,
S.
(
2017
), “
Willingness to pay for over-the-top services in China and Korea
”,
Telecommunications Policy
, Vol. 
41
No. 
3
, pp. 
197
-
207
, doi: .
Kim
,
W.J.
,
Ryoo
,
Y.
,
Lee
,
S.Y.
and
Lee
,
J.A.
(
2023
), “
Chatbot advertising as a double-edged sword: the roles of regulatory focus and privacy concerns
”,
Journal of Advertising
, Vol. 
52
No. 
4
, pp. 
504
-
522
, doi: .
Kumar
,
K.
,
Rama Krishna
,
V.
,
Govindaraj
,
M.
,
Pawar
,
V.
,
Sathyakala
,
S.
and
Viswanathan
,
R.
(
2025
), “
Characteristics determining customer's preferences for OTT video streaming: a multivariate analysis
”,
Entertainment Computing
, Vol. 
52
, 100746, doi: .
Kuo
,
K.M.
,
Liu
,
C.F.
and
Ma
,
C.C.
(
2013
), “
An investigation of the effect of nurses' technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems
”,
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
, Vol. 
13
No. 
1
, pp. 
1
-
14
, doi: .
Kuppelwieser
,
V.G.
and
Klaus
,
P.
(
2021
), “
Measuring customer experience quality: the EXQ scale revisited
”,
Journal of Business Research
, Vol. 
126
No. 
December 2018
, pp. 
624
-
633
, doi: .
Kwangsawad
,
A.
and
Jattamart
,
A.
(
2022
), “
Overcoming customer innovation resistance to the sustainable adoption of chatbot services: a community-enterprise perspective in Thailand
”,
Journal of Innovation and Knowledge
, Vol. 
7
No. 
3
, 100211, doi: .
Lee
,
H.
,
Ahn
,
H.
,
Choi
,
S.
and
Choi
,
W.
(
2014
), “
The SAMS: smartphone addiction management system and verification
”,
Journal of Medical Systems
, Vol. 
38
No. 
1
, 1, doi: .
Lee
,
Chang
,
I.H.
,
Wu
,
T.J.
and
Chen
,
R.S.
(
2022
), “
The moderating role of perceived interactivity in the relationship between online customer experience and behavioral intentions to use parenting apps for Taiwanese preschool parents
”,
Sage Open
, Vol. 
12
No. 
1
, pp. 
1
-
11
, doi: .
Lee
,
S.
,
Yoon
,
J.
,
Cho
,
Y.
and
Chun
,
J.
(
2024
), “
A systematic review of chatbot-assisted interventions for substance use
”,
Frontiers in Psychiatry
, Vol. 
15
 
September
, pp. 
1
-
10
, doi: .
Levy
,
M.
,
Powell
,
P.
and
Worrall
,
L.
(
2005
), “
Strategic intent and e-business in SMEs: enablers and inhibitors
”,
Information Resources Management Journal
, Vol. 
18
No. 
4
, pp. 
1
-
20
, doi: .
Li
,
C.Y.
(
2015
), “
Switching barriers and customer retention. Why customers dissatisfied with online service recovery remain loyal?
”,
Journal of Service Theory and Practice
, Vol. 
25
No. 
4
, pp. 
370
-
393
, doi: .
Lian
,
J.W.
and
Yen
,
D.C.
(
2014
), “
Online shopping drivers and barriers for older adults: age and gender differences
”,
Computers in Human Behavior
, Vol. 
37
, pp. 
133
-
143
, doi: .
Lima
,
B.
,
Ganga
,
G.M.D.
,
Godinho Filho
,
M.
,
De Santa-Eulalia
,
L.A.
,
Thürer
,
M.
,
Queiroz
,
M.M.
and
Moraes
,
K.K.
(
2025
), “
Timing and interdependencies in blockchain capabilities development for supply chain management: a resource-based view perspective
”,
Industrial Management and Data Systems
, Vol. 
125
No. 
5
, pp. 
1645
-
1685
, doi: .
Lin
,
X.
,
Dong
,
G.
,
Wang
,
Q.
and
Du
,
X.
(
2015
), “
Abnormal gray matter and white matter volume in ‘Internet gaming addicts’
”,
Addictive Behaviors
, Vol. 
40
, pp. 
137
-
143
, doi: .
Ling
,
V.
,
Sotnikova
,
L.
,
Rodionova
,
I.
,
Vasilets
,
I.
,
Zavjalova
,
O.
,
Fedorovskaya
,
V.
and
Datkova
,
E.
(
2020
), “
Online educational resources for students and digital barrier
”,
TEM Journal
, Vol. 
9
No. 
1
, pp. 
373
-
379
, doi: .
Loo
,
M.K.
,
Ramachandran
,
S.
and
Raja Yusof
,
R.N.
(
2024
), “
Systematic review of factors and barriers influencing E-commerce adoption among SMEs over the last decade: a TOE framework perspective
”,
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
, Vol. 
16
No. 
2
, doi: .
Lüders
,
M.
and
Sundet
,
V.S.
(
2022
), “
Conceptualizing the experiential affordances of watching online TV
”,
Television and New Media
, Vol. 
23
No. 
4
, pp. 
335
-
351
, doi: .
Lwoga
,
E.T.
and
Chigona
,
W.
(
2019
), “
Perception, usage and barriers towards the utilisation of the Telecentre among rural women in Tanzania
”,
Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society
, Vol. 
17
No. 
1
, pp. 
2
-
16
, doi: .
MacGregor
,
R.C.
and
Kartiwi
,
M.
(
2010
), “
Perception of barriers to e-commerce adoption in SMEs in a developed and developing country: a comparison between Australia and Indonesia
”,
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations
, Vol. 
8
No. 
1
, pp. 
61
-
82
, doi: .
Malone
,
D.W.
(
1975
), “
An introduction to the application of interpretive structural modeling
”,
Proceedings of the IEEE
, Vol. 
63
No. 
3
, pp. 
397
-
404
, doi: .
Mani
,
K.
(
2025
), “
OTT industry must adopt diverse economic models for sustainability
”,
Economic Times
,
available at:
 https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/media/entertainment/ott-industry-must-adopt-diverse-economic-models-for-sustainability-kiran-mani/articleshow/117308123.cms (
accessed
 13 February 2025).
Mansour
,
E.A.H.
(
2015
), “
The use of social networking sites (SNSs) by the faculty members of the School of Library & information Science, PAAET, Kuwait
”,
The Eletronic Library
, Vol. 
33
No. 
3
, pp. 
524
-
546
, doi: .
Mathevan
,
S.
(
2024
), “
Why can't boomer Binge? Bridging the gap between OTT content and older audiences
”,
Linkedin
.
Mathiyazhagan
,
K.
,
Govindan
,
K.
,
NoorulHaq
,
A.
and
Geng
,
Y.
(
2013
), “
An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management
”,
Journal of Cleaner Production
, Vol. 
47
, pp. 
283
-
297
, doi: .
Moher
,
D.
,
Liberati
,
A.
,
Tetzlaff
,
J.
and
Altman
,
D.G.
(
2009
), “
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
”,
BMJ (Online)
, Vol. 
339
No. 
7716
, pp. 
332
-
336
, doi: .
Mordor Intelligence
(
2025
),
Over-The-Top (OTT) Market: Growth, Trends, and Forecast (2026–2031)
,
available at
: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/over-the-top-market
Nabot
,
A.
,
Garaj
,
V.
and
Balachandran
,
W.
(
2014
), “
Consumer attitudes toward online shopping: an exploratory study from Jordan
”,
International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development
, Vol. 
5
No. 
3
, pp. 
13
-
24
, doi: .
Nafees
,
L.
,
Mehdi
,
M.
,
Gupta
,
R.
,
Kalia
,
S.
,
Banerjee
,
S.
and
Kapoor
,
S.
(
2021
), “
Netflix in India: expanding to success
”,
Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies
, Vol. 
11
No. 
2
, pp. 
1
-
31
, doi: .
Nagaraj
,
S.
,
Singh
,
S.
and
Yasa
,
V.R.
(
2021
), “
Factors affecting consumers' willingness to subscribe to over-the-top (OTT) video streaming services in India
”,
Technology in Society
, Vol. 
65
No. 
1
, pp. 
160
-
791
, doi: .
Nallam
,
P.
,
Bhandari
,
S.
,
Sanders
,
J.
and
Martin-Hammond
,
A.
(
2020
), “
A question of access: exploring the perceived benefits and barriers of intelligent voice assistants for improving access to consumer health resources among low-income older adults
”,
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
, Vol. 
6
, doi: .
Nandukrishna
,
A.T.
and
Sridevi
,
P.
(
2024
), “
Play, pause or praise?–a dual factor theory exploration of continuance, discontinuance and recommendation intentions in OTT platforms
”,
World Leisure Journal
, Vol. 
66
No. 
2
, pp. 
225
-
249
, doi: .
Ndayizigamiye
,
P.
and
Khoase
,
R.G.
(
2018
), “
Inhibitors of the adoption of e-commerce by SMMES in South African cities
”,
International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies
, Vol. 
10
No. 
1
, pp. 
51
-
66
.
Nida
,
Chandra
,
A.
and
Shukla
,
R.
(
2024
), “
ISM-fuzzy MICMAC approach for modelling the enablers of sustainability
”,
IIMBG Journal of Sustainable Business and Innovation
, Vol. 
2
No. 
2
, pp. 
120
-
142
, doi: .
Nikolic
,
A.
,
Bukurov
,
B.
,
Kocic
,
I.
,
Vukovic
,
M.
,
Ladjevic
,
N.
,
Vrhovac
,
M.
,
Pavlović
,
Z.
,
Grujicic
,
J.
,
Kisic
,
D.
and
Sipetic
,
S.
(
2023
), “
Smartphone addiction, sleep quality, depression, anxiety, and stress among medical students
”,
Frontiers in Public Health
, Vol. 
11
, 1252371, doi: .
Palmer
,
A.
(
2010
), “
Customer experience management: a critical review of an emerging idea
”,
Journal of Services Marketing
, Vol. 
24
No. 
3
, pp. 
196
-
208
, doi: .
Palomba
,
A.
(
2022
), “
Building OTT brand loyalty and brand equity: impact of original series on OTT services
”,
Telematics and Informatics
, Vol. 
66
, 101733, doi: .
Parasuraman
,
A.
(
2000
), “
Technology readiness index (Tri): a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies
”,
Journal of Service Research
, Vol. 
2
No. 
4
, pp. 
307
-
320
, doi: .
Parasuraman
,
A.
and
Colby
,
C.L.
(
2014
),
Techno-Ready Marketing: How and Why Customers Adopt Technology
,
Free Press
,
New York, NY
.
Park
,
E.A.
(
2017
), “
Why the networks can't beat Netflix: speculations on the US OTT Services Market
”,
Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance
, Vol. 
19
No. 
1
, pp. 
21
-
39
, doi: .
Pentz
,
C.D.
,
du Preez
,
R.
and
Swiegers
,
L.
(
2020
), “
To bu(Y) or not to bu(Y): perceived risk barriers to online shopping among South African generation Y consumers
”,
Cogent Business and Management
, Vol. 
7
No. 
1
, 1827813, doi: .
Polisetty
,
A.
,
Sowmya
,
G.
and
Pahari
,
S.
(
2023
), “
Streaming towards innovation: understanding consumer adoption of OTT services through IRT and TAM
”,
Cogent Business and Management
, Vol. 
10
No. 
3
, 2283917, doi: .
Rahe
,
V.
,
Buschow
,
C.
and
Schlütz
,
D.
(
2021
), “
How users approach novel media products: brand perception of Netflix and Amazon Prime video as signposts within the German subscription-based video-on-demand market
”,
Journal of Media Business Studies
, Vol. 
18
No. 
1
, pp. 
45
-
58
, doi: .
Rahiem
,
M.D.H.
(
2020
), “
Technological barriers and challenges in the use of ICT during the COVID-19 emergency remote learning
”,
Universal Journal of Educational Research
, Vol. 
8
No. 
11B
, pp. 
6124
-
6133
, doi: .
Rahman
,
K.T.
and
Arif
,
Md.Z.U.
(
2021
), “
Impacts of binge-watching on Netflix during the COVID-19 pandemic
”,
South Asian Journal of Marketing
, Vol. 
2
No. 
1
, pp. 
97
-
112
, doi: .
Rainey
,
J.P.
,
Blackburn
,
B.E.
,
McCutcheon
,
C.L.
,
Kenyon
,
C.M.
,
Campbell
,
K.J.
,
Anderson
,
L.A.
and
Gililland
,
J.M.
(
2023
), “
A multilingual chatbot can effectively engage arthroplasty patients who have limited English proficiency
”,
The Journal of Arthroplasty
, Vol. 
38
No. 
7
, pp. 
S78
-
S83
, doi: .
Rudolph
,
T.
,
Rosenbloom
,
B.
and
Wagner
,
T.
(
2004
), “
Barriers to online shopping in Switzerland
”,
Journal of International Consumer Marketing
, Vol. 
16
No. 
3
, pp. 
55
-
74
, doi: .
Sage
,
A.P.
(
1977
),
Methodology for Large-Scale Systems
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
Salahshour
,
M.
,
Dahlan
,
H.M.
and
Iahad
,
N.A.
(
2016
), “
A case of academic social networking sites usage in Malaysia: drivers, benefits, and barriers
”,
International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach
, Vol. 
9
No. 
2
, pp. 
88
-
99
, doi: .
Sanzgiri
,
V.
(
2025
), “
India leads in mobile usage, raises concerns of screen addiction
”,
The Hindu Businessline
,
available at:
 https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/india-leads-in-mobile-usage-raises-concerns-of-screen-addiction/article69179192.ece (
accessed
 11 February 2025).
Saxena
,
Sushil
and
Vrat
,
P.
(
1990
), “
Impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables—a micmac analysis for energy conservation
”,
Systems Research
, Vol. 
7
No. 
4
, pp. 
245
-
253
, doi: .
Saxena
,
N.
,
Gera
,
N.
and
Taneja
,
M.
(
2023
), “
An empirical study on facilitators and inhibitors of adoption of mobile banking in India
”,
Electronic Commerce Research
, Vol. 
23
No. 
4
, pp. 
2573
-
2604
, doi: .
Schreiner
,
M.
and
Hess
,
T.
(
2015
), “
Examining the role of privacy in virtual migration examining the role of privacy in virtual migration: the case of WhatsApp and Threema
”.
Scott
,
D.A.
,
Valley
,
B.
and
Simecka
,
B.A.
(
2017
), “
Mental health concerns in the digital age
”,
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
, Vol. 
15
No. 
3
, pp. 
604
-
613
, doi: .
Sedotto
,
R.N.M.
,
Edwards
,
A.E.
,
Dulin
,
P.L.
and
King
,
D.K.
(
2024
), “
Engagement with mHealth alcohol interventions: user perspectives on an app or chatbot-delivered program to reduce drinking
”,
Healthcare (Switzerland)
, Vol. 
12
No. 
1
, p.
101
, doi: .
Sesar
,
V.
,
Martinčević
,
I.
and
Žunac
,
A.G.
(
2024
), “
Student perception about trust barriers regarding online purchase intention
”,
TEM Journal
, Vol. 
13
No. 
2
, pp. 
1126
-
1132
, doi: .
Seuring
,
S.
and
Gold
,
S.
(
2012
), “
Conducting content‐analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management
”,
Supply Chain Management: International Journal
, Vol. 
17
No. 
5
, pp. 
544
-
555
, doi: .
Sezgin
,
E.
,
Kocaballi
,
A.B.
,
Dolce
,
M.
,
Skeens
,
M.
,
Militello
,
L.
,
Huang
,
Y.
,
Stevens
,
J.
and
Kemper
,
A.R.
(
2024
), “
Chatbot for social need screening and resource sharing with vulnerable families: iterative design and evaluation study
”,
JMIR Human Factors
, Vol. 
11
, doi: .
Shah
,
R.R.
,
Dixon
,
C.C.
,
Fowler
,
M.J.
,
Driesse
,
T.M.
,
Liang
,
X.
,
Summerour
,
C.E.
,
Gross
,
D.C.
,
Spangler
,
H.B.
,
Lynch
,
D.H.
and
Batsis
,
J.A.
(
2024
), “
Using voice assistant systems to improve dietary recall among older adults: perspectives of registered dietitians
”,
Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics
, Vol. 
43
No. 
1
, pp. 
1
-
13
, doi: .
Sharma
,
R.
and
Kakkar
,
A.
(
2022
), “
Adoption of VoD services: an investigation of extended technology acceptance model
”,
International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising
, Vol. 
16
Nos
1-2
, pp. 
62
-
80
, doi: .
Shin
,
J.
,
Park
,
Y.
and
Lee
,
D.
(
2016
), “
Strategic management of over-the-top services: focusing on Korean consumer adoption behavior
”,
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
, Vol. 
112
, pp. 
329
-
337
, doi: .
Soni
,
A.
(
2023
), “
Cultural barriers to communication: examples & how to overcome it
”,
Clearinfo, available at:
 https://clearinfo.in/blog/cultural-barriers-to-communication/ (
accessed
 9 February 2025).
Soopramanien
,
D.
(
2011
), “
Conflicting attitudes and scepticism towards online shopping: the role of experience
”,
International Journal of Consumer Studies
, Vol. 
35
No. 
3
, pp. 
338
-
347
, doi: .
Statista
(
2025
), “
OTT video – India
”,
Statista Market Outlook
,
available at
: https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/media/tv-video/ott-video/india
Sullivan
,
Y.W.
and
Koh
,
C.E.
(
2019
), “
Social media enablers and inhibitors: understanding their relationships in a social networking site context
”,
International Journal of Information Management
, Vol. 
49
No. 
October 2017
, pp. 
170
-
189
, doi: .
Sumalinog
,
G.G.
(
2022
), “
Barriers of online education in the new normal: teachers' perspectives
”,
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research
, Vol. 
21
No. 
1
, pp. 
33
-
50
, doi: .
Tarquini
,
A.
,
Mühlbacher
,
H.
and
Kreuzer
,
M.
(
2022
), “
The experience of luxury craftsmanship–a strategic asset for luxury experience management
”,
Journal of Marketing Management
, Vol. 
38
Nos
13-14
, pp. 
1307
-
1338
, doi: .
Vidiasova
,
L.A.
,
Kuznetsova
,
E.M.
and
Grigoryeva
,
I.A.
(
2022
), “
Integration of the elderly into the information space: research case of Saint-Petersburg
”,
Pubmed
, Vol. 
35
No. 
5
, pp. 
668
-
678
.
Vuchkovski
,
D.
,
Zalaznik
,
M.
,
Mitr
,
M.
and
Pfajfar
,
G.
(
2023
), “
A look at the future of work: the digital transformation of teams from conventional to virtual
”,
Journal of Business Ethics
, Vol. 
163
No. 
January 2022
, doi: .
Wang
,
H.Y.
and
Cheng
,
C.
(
2021
), “
New perspectives on the prevalence and associated factors of gaming disorder in Hong Kong community adults: a generational approach
”,
Computers in Human Behavior
, Vol. 
114
, 106574, doi: .
Warfield
,
J.N.
(
1974
), “
Toward interpretation of complex structural models
”,
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
, Vol. 
4
No. 
5
, pp. 
405
-
417
, doi: .
White
,
M.D.
and
Marsh
,
E.E.
(
2006
), “
Content analysis: a flexible methodology
”,
Library Trends
, Vol. 
55
No. 
1
, pp. 
22
-
45
, doi: .
Wölfling
,
K.
,
Müller
,
K.W.
,
Dreier
,
M.
,
Ruckes
,
C.
,
Deuster
,
O.
,
Batra
,
A.
,
Mann
,
K.
,
Musalek
,
M.
,
Schuster
,
A.
,
Lemenager
,
T.
,
Hanke
,
S.
and
Beutel
,
M.E.
(
2019
), “
Efficacy of short-term treatment of internet and computer game addiction: a randomized clinical trial
”,
JAMA Psychiatry
, Vol. 
76
No. 
10
, pp. 
1018
-
1025
, doi: .
Xavier
(
2024
), “
Language localization: what is it and why is it so important?
”,
Xavier
,
available at:
 https://lcplocalizations.com/language-localization-what-is-it-and-why-is-it-so-important/ (
accessed
 13 February 2025).
Xu
,
Y.
,
Shi
,
Y.
and
Qin
,
T.
(
2023
), “
Challenges in smart tourism: a media content analysis of digital barriers for senior tourists in China
”,
Information Technology and Tourism
, Vol. 
25
No. 
4
, pp. 
665
-
682
, doi: .
Xue
,
P.
and
Jo
,
W.M.
(
2024
), “
Investigating consumer purchase decision based on switching barriers and decision postponement: moderating role of time pressure
”,
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights
, Vol. 
7
No. 
4
, pp. 
1681
-
1698
, doi: .
Yoon
,
J.H.
and
Kim
,
H.K.
(
2023
), “
Why do consumers continue to use OTT services?
”,
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
, Vol. 
60
 
June
, 101285, doi: .
Zeba
,
F.
and
Ganguli
,
S.
(
2016
), “
Word-of-mouth, trust, and perceived risk in online shopping: an extension of the technology acceptance model
”,
International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector
, Vol. 
8
No. 
4
, pp. 
17
-
32
, doi: .
Zhou
,
T.
(
2018
), “
Examining users' switch from online banking to mobile banking
”,
International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations
, Vol. 
18
No. 
1
, pp. 
51
-
66
, doi: .
Published in IIMT Journal of Management. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at Link to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licence.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal