There has been extended debate about how to conceptualise inter‐organizational restructuring in late twentieth century capitalism, giving rise to a number of models that attempt to represent productive change. A number of such conceptualisations of transformation under the banner of “agility” attempt to provide guidance about “managing” physical and social relationships within and between companies in response to growing market complexity. The theoretical argument in this paper is that inter‐firm agility cannot be objectively understood in all cases using simple unidirectional cause and effect as such theories do not take into account more subjective aspects of interaction. Specifically, we argue that to have a vision of agility in action there must be an evaluation of complexity in and between organisational boundaries with a theoretical approach that gives a more robust appreciation of inter‐firm ties. Conceptualising agility in this way captures the essence of tacit knowledge between firms along with the physical dynamics of network functioning.
Article navigation
1 December 2000
Research Article|
December 01 2000
Agile supply: rethinking systems thinking, systems practice Available to Purchase
Colin Rigby;
Colin Rigby
University of Keele, Staffordshire, UK and CERAM Research Limited, Stoke‐on‐Trent, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul Forrester;
Paul Forrester
Aston University, Birmingham, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
John Burnett
John Burnett
CERAM Research Limited, Stoke‐on‐Trent, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-5929
Print ISSN: 1465-4652
© MCB UP Limited
2000
International Journal of Agile Management Systems (2000) 2 (3): 178–186.
Citation
Rigby C, Day M, Forrester P, Burnett J (2000), "Agile supply: rethinking systems thinking, systems practice". International Journal of Agile Management Systems, Vol. 2 No. 3 pp. 178–186, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14654650010356086
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Imagining Niklas Luhmann as a “change manager”: scrum as an example of a closed system for the self-organized stabilization of corporate agility
Journal of Organizational Change Management (August,2020)
Continuous improvement improved
Work Study (July,1999)
Emergence and accomplishment in organizational change
Journal of Organizational Change Management (April,2000)
Changing the “whole system” in the public sector
Journal of Organizational Change Management (April,2000)
Managing organizational change by using soft systems thinking in action research projects
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business (April,2009)
Related Chapters
E Pluribus Unum: Using Group Model Building with Many Interdependent Organizations to Create Integrated Health Care Networks
Organization Development in Healthcare: Conversations on Research and Strategies
Organization Renewal through Entrepreneurial Initiatives: When the Seed Changes the Soil
Research in Organizational Change and Development
Chapter 2 Organizing for Agile and Sustainable Health Care: The Alegent Health Case
Organizing for Sustainable Health Care
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
