Skip to Main Content
Purpose

This study aims to examine the climate change impacts on Phu Thuan’s fishery livelihoods, identifying adaptation strategies and policies for resilience. It addresses impacts, demographic factors and sustainable fishery management, aligning with SDGs 1, 13 and 14 for coastal communities.

Design/methodology/approach

This mixed-method study surveys (n = 119) focus groups and meteorological data (1956–2022) to assess climate change impacts in Phu Thuan, Vietnam. Logistic regression and Kruskal–Wallis tests analyze adaptation, complemented by qualitative insights.

Findings

Climate change causes 23.5% severe gear damage and 21% resource depletion in Phu Thuan. Households adapt via 58% fishing reinvestment and 47% seasonal labor; 21% use unsustainable nets. Younger age increases diversification (OR = 1.50, p < 0.01) mirroring global constraints.

Research limitations/implications

Sample size (n = 119) and focus on Phu Thuan limit generalizability. Older fishers may underreport impacts. Recent data (2015–2022) may miss historical baselines. Larger and longitudinal studies with marine assessments can enhance findings for scalable climate adaptation strategies.

Practical implications

Vocational training, fishing ground regulation and gear subsidies mitigate 23.5% gear damage. Community co-management reduces unsustainable practices. Aligned with Vietnam’s National Adaptation Plan, these policies enhance economic stability and sustainability for climate-vulnerable coastal communities.

Social implications

Training empowers younger fishers, reducing poverty (SDG 1). Equitable fishing access fosters community cohesion. Adaptation workshops promote sustainable practices, enhancing resilience and social equity in Phu Thuan, supporting inclusive development.

Originality/value

Integrating mixed-method data, this study quantifies Phu Thuan’s climate impacts (23.5% gear damage) and adaptations (OR = 1.50, p < 0.01). Global comparisons and SDG-aligned policies offer a novel framework for sustainable fishery management in vulnerable coastal communities.

Climate change is a pressing global challenge that profoundly influences the development and sustainability of countries, regions and continents (Barros, 2014). Its effects will be particularly severe in developing countries where millions of people are substantially dependent on natural ecosystems for their livelihood and well–being (Aboye et al., 2023; Weatherdon et al., 2016). In these countries, the areas most vulnerable to its impacts are coastal regions, which face heightened risks from global warming and extreme climatic events (Islam et al., 2019). Similar to agriculture, the fisheries sector is highly vulnerable to these changes due to its dependence on natural and environmental conditions (Brander et al., 2017; Hobday et al., 2018). Climate variability and climate-induced disasters threaten fishers’ livelihoods and fishing communities worldwide (Islam et al., 2019; Allison et al, 2009). Fishers are experiencing significant losses and damages due to the changing climate (White et al., 2005). For instance, coastal communities in Bangladesh, the Philippines and Ghana face declining fish stocks and intensified storms, prompting adaptive strategies like livelihood diversification (e.g. small-scale aquaculture in Bangladesh) and community-based resource management (Alam and Mallick, 2022; Alcantara et al., 2023). These cases highlight the need for context-specific policies, informing this study’s focus on Phu Thuan.

Vietnam, prone to natural disasters such as storms, floods and coastal erosion, is among the world’s most vulnerable to climate change (FAO, 2020; Huynh et al., 2021). With over 3,260 kilometers of coastline accounting for 15% of the country’s natural area, Vietnam’s coastal regions are home to approximately 25% of the national population across 28 provinces and 125 coastal districts. Of these, 23 provinces include particularly disadvantaged coastal and island communes. These regions are heavily impacted by climate change, as the livelihoods of their populations depend heavily on natural resources (Schleyer-Lindenmann et al., 2022). Vietnam’s marine fisheries face intense pressure, with an ecological footprint exceeding the bio-capacity of its coastal ecosystems by an estimated 1.5 times, driven by overfishing, competition from large vessels and environmental degradation (Hoang, 2021; Tran et al., 2021). In Phu Thuan Commune, this overexploitation reduces nearshore fish stocks, exacerbating climate-induced vulnerabilities and limiting adaptive capacity. The impacts of climate change are predicted to amplify further and exacerbate the existing pressures on the coastal regions and communities, threatening sustainable development in terms of livelihoods and natural resources, particularly in the disadvantaged coastal areas (Barros, 2014; Tran et al., 2017).

Marine protected areas (MPAs), such as those in the Tam Giang-Cau Hai lagoon, are critical for conserving marine biodiversity and supporting fishery sustainability in Vietnam. However, restricted access to these areas reduces traditional fishing grounds, pushing fishers toward unsustainable practices like small-mesh nets, which further deplete resources (Erzini, 2020; Pomeroy et al., 2009; Pham et al., 2023). Thua Thien Hue, a coastal province in Central Vietnam, has 128 kilometers of coastline, with nearly 70% of its population living in rural areas (Badjeck et al., 2010). Among these are 23 particularly disadvantaged coastal and island communes. Fishing and agriculture, traditional livelihoods for most households in these areas, serve as the primary sources of income (Galappaththi et al., 2019). However, these livelihoods are highly precarious due to the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters, such as storms, floods, droughts, cold spells and tornadoes (Huynh et al., 2021; Hoang et al., 2022). These events are causing severe and escalating impacts on coastal plains and lagoons, particularly in low-lying and disadvantaged areas (Hagedoorn et al., 2021). According to national climate change scenarios and local assessments, Thua Thien Hue is one of the regions most severely affected by climate change and extreme weather. Agriculture and fisheries are identified as the most impacted sectors (Badjeck et al., 2010).

Grounded in the vulnerability framework (Galappaththi et al., 2019), this study investigates the multifaceted impacts of climate change on fishery households in Phu Thuan Commune, Phu Vang District, Thua Thien Hue Province, focusing on disruptions to fishing gear, marine resources, human health and livelihoods. It examines how households adapt through strategies such as livelihood diversification, gear modification and non-fishing activities, while assessing their sustainability. The study addresses three research questions:

RQ1.

How does climate change impact fishery livelihoods in Phu Thuan?

RQ2.

Which demographic and socioeconomic factors shape household adaptation strategies?

RQ3.

What policies can promote resilience and sustainable fishery management in Phu Thuan?

Using a mixed-method approach, this research provides empirical and theoretical insights into social-environmental interactions in coastal communities. It aims to inform culturally sensitive, climate-resilient policies aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 13 (Climate Action), SDG 14 (Life Below Water) and SDG 1 (No Poverty), to foster resilience and sustainable resource management. This intersection highlights the need for integrated approaches that balance ecological sustainability with socioeconomic development in vulnerable coastal communities. The findings aim to guide policies that promote sustainable fishing practices, livelihood diversification and equitable resource access, addressing the socioeconomic and ecological challenges faced by Phu Thuan’s fishery households.

Phu Vang District is bounded to the east by the East Vietnam Sea, to the west by Huong Tra District and Hue City, to the north by Quang Dien District and to the south by Phu Loc District. The Phu Vang lowlands have a total area of 28,032 hectares, of which 10,829 hectares are agricultural land, 13,933 hectares are non-agricultural and 3,269 hectares are idle land. The district has a population of 182,336 people, with a population density of 647 per square kilometer (km2) and a workforce of 85,830 (2023).

Thua Thien Hue is a central coastal province of Vietnam, with 128 km of coastline, the Tam Giang-Cau Hai lagoon, covering 22,000 ha and forest land spanning more than 200,000 ha. The lagoon extends 70 km and supports over 380,000 people in buffer areas, 45% of whom live in 32 communities in five districts and 236 villages (Pham and Saizen, 2023). These residents, who form a significant portion of the province’s total population of 1,090,879, rely on fishing, aquaculture and farming, exploiting the lagoon’s natural resources. Phu Thuan Commune, one of eight particularly disadvantaged coastal communes in Phu Vang District, Thua Thien Hue Province frequently experiences natural disasters such as storms, floods, droughts, coastal erosion and epidemics (Report on the Social Economic Development Plan of Phu Thuan Commune (Hard Copy), 2023). Marine fishing is the primary income source for most households in Phu Thuan’s fishing hamlets, but overfishing and competition from large vessels exacerbate resource depletion, with nearshore fish stocks declining by approximately 20% over the past decade (Hoang, 2021; Ayad and Lefilef, 2025). MPAs in the Tam Giang-Cau Hai lagoon conserve biodiversity and regulate fishing, yet restricted access limits traditional fishing grounds, pushing fishers toward unsustainable practices like small-mesh nets, which threaten long-term resource sustainability (Erzini, 2020; Pomeroy et al., 2009); Pham et al., 2023).

This study employed a mixed-method approach, integrating qualitative and quantitative methods to collect and analyze data, as guided by Creswell and Clark (2017). Data collection occurred in Phu Thuan Commune, Phu Vang District, Thua Thien Hue Province(see Figure 1), from November 2023 to April 2024, using document analysis, focus group discussions, key informant interviews and household surveys.

Figure 1.

Map of Phu Thuan Commune and Thua Thien Hue Province showing the coastline

Source: Adapted from local government data, 2023

Figure 1.

Map of Phu Thuan Commune and Thua Thien Hue Province showing the coastline

Source: Adapted from local government data, 2023

Close modal

First, document analysis involved reviewing annual reports on the socio-economic development of Thua Thien Hue Province, Phu Vang District and Phu Thuan Commune to contextualize the study site. Meteorological data spanning 1956–2022 were collected from the Hue Meteorological Station to analyze climate change trends. Second, interviews with key informants, including commune leaders and fisher association heads, were conducted. These interviews aimed to understand the local authorities’ socioeconomic characteristics, strategies and action plans in response to climate change and extreme events, as well as the challenges and planned measures to support fishery households in securing livelihoods and conserving natural resources. Focus groups discussions were conducted with 12 representatives of local fishery households, selected based on diversity in gender, age and household type as recommended by fishing hamlet leaders. This method provided insights into household perspectives on climate change impacts and adaptive strategies.

Household surveys were administered to 119 fishery households across six hamlets in Phu Thuan Commune (Tan An, Xuan An, Trung An, An Duong 2 and An Duong 3). As described by De Vaus (Thuy et al., 2017), a simple random sampling approach was employed, using the list of fishing households provided by local authorities. If a selected household was inaccessible, the researcher substituted it with the nearest available household based on recommendations from hamlet representatives. This method ensured equal selection probability and represented population heterogeneity, suitable for studying diverse adaptation strategies. To address potential biases, such as incomplete household lists or accessibility issues, hamlet leaders were consulted to verify substitutions, minimizing selection bias. However, the sample size (n = 119) may not fully capture the diversity of Phu Thuan’s fishing households, a limitation addressed in the Recommendations section.

Quantitative data, including meteorological records and survey responses, were processed using Microsoft Excel with descriptive statistical analysis conducted to clarify the research aims. To strengthen causal insights, logistic regression analysis was performed using R software to examine relationships between demographic factors (e.g. age, education, number of laborers) and adaptation strategies (e.g. investment in fishing vs non-fishing activities). Results, reported as odds ratios and p-values, showed younger age increased diversification likelihood (e.g. OR = 1.8, p < 0.05). Qualitative data from the focus group and key informant interviews was recorded and organized by session and then used to complement and interpret the quantitative findings presented in the paper.

Table 1 presents the perceived barriers to climate change mitigation among surveyed fishery households. The most commonly cited obstacle (20.7%) is the high cost of action, reflecting concerns about the financial burden of adaptation. A significant portion (19.7%) selected “other” reasons, suggesting diverse and context-specific perceptions not captured by predefined options. In addition, 16.3% believe the impacts of climate change are too severe to mitigate, whereas 15.0% attribute inaction to selfish attitudes among individuals. Notably, insufficient government commitment (14.7%) and general apathy (13.7%) were also cited as key concerns.

Table 1.

Why don’t you think things can be done to mitigate climate change

Perceived reasonsN%
Impacts of climate change are too severe1916.3
Requires large cost to take actions2420.7
It is committed from government policy to local government1714.7
People are selfish to do anything to tackle climate change1815.0
No one care1613.7
Others2319.7
Source(s): Author’s work

These findings underscore a complex mix of economic, institutional and behavioral barriers that limit effective climate action in the region. The prominence of cost-related concerns reflects the financial vulnerability of fishery households, whereas the noted lack of public and policy engagement highlights the need for targeted communication, trust-building and inclusive adaptation policies.

Figure 2 illustrates that the majority of respondents believe climate change poses a direct threat to local infrastructure, particularly to homes and roads. While a small minority disagreed with this assessment, their rationale remains unclear. This finding signals the urgent need for climate-resilient infrastructure planning, especially in coastal areas exposed to extreme weather events.

Figure 2.

Pie chart showing perceptions of climate change risks to infrastructure among fishery households

Source: Author’s work

Figure 2.

Pie chart showing perceptions of climate change risks to infrastructure among fishery households

Source: Author’s work

Close modal

Figure 3 shows that cost-related concerns remain the dominant perceived barrier to implementing climate change solutions. Perceived severity of climate impacts ranks second, followed by social and psychological factors such as apathy and selfishness. The relatively lower ranking of institutional issues suggests that while governance matters, the most immediate constraints are economic and attitudinal in nature.

Figure 3.

Bar chart showing perceived barriers to climate change solutions among fishery households

Source: Author’s work

Figure 3.

Bar chart showing perceived barriers to climate change solutions among fishery households

Source: Author’s work

Close modal

Table 2 presents descriptive statistics summarizing respondents’ perceptions of the impacts of climate change on fishery activities, fishing efforts and livelihoods. Most of the mean values fall between 2.87 and 3.11, reflecting a moderate level of agreement across a broad range of climate-related impact statements.

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics

Statement about the impacts of climate changeNMin.Max.MeanSD
How would you describe the trend in the average number of fishing caught during last 10 years119153.071.394
How would you describe the trend in the average yield of aquaculture during last 10 years119153.071.394
To what extent to you agree with the following statements about the impacts of climate change on fishery activities – early rains that are not expected119152.991.414
To what extent to you agree with the following statements about the impacts of climate change on fishery activities – waterbody is too hot as a results of heat waves119152.971.465
To what extent to you agree with the following statements about the impacts of climate change on fishery activities – shifts in the start or end of rains119153.001.431
To what extent to you agree with the following statements about the impacts of climate change on fishery activities – shifts in start and end of dry season119153.061.383
In terms of fishing efforts – climate change impact on fishing infrastructure119152.991.373
In terms of fishing efforts – climate change impact on fishing gears119152.831.385
In terms of fishing efforts – climate change impact on safety of fishing119153.031.397
In terms of fishing efforts – climate change impact of fishing communities119153.071.475
In terms of fishing efforts – climate change impact on fishing grounds119152.921.444
In terms of fishing efforts – climate change impact on fish availability at the fishing ground119153.111.420
In terms of livelihood – climate change impact of health status of fishermen119153.001.465
In terms of livelihood – climate change impact of household income119152.881.436
In terms of livelihood – climate change impact on flux of migrant of fishermen119152.921.371
In terms of livelihood – climate change impact on fishers security119152.971.369
In terms of livelihood – climate change impact on the cost of fishing gears119152.951.429
In terms of livelihood – climate change impact on fishing marketing access119152.991.476
To what extent to you agree with the following statements about the impacts of climate change on fishery activities – Shifts in start and end of dry season119152.981.408
In terms of fishing efforts – climate change impact on fishing infrastructure119152.871.390
In terms of fishing efforts – climate change impact on fishing gears119152.881.433
In terms of fishing efforts – climate change impact on fishing gears119153.041.421
Valid N (listwise)119    
Source(s): Author’s work

Among the most affected domains, fish availability at fishing grounds (mean = 3.11) and fishing communities (mean = 3.07) stand out, suggesting widespread concern over resource depletion and community-level vulnerability. Perceptions of early rains, heatwaves and shifts in seasonal patterns also scored around 3.0, reflecting uncertainty and disruption in local weather patterns.

The standard deviations, ranging from 1.37 to 1.48, indicate a relatively high variance in perceptions, which may be influenced by differences in geography, household experience or individual adaptation capacity. These results suggest a complex and heterogeneous understanding of climate impacts, particularly in relation to fishing infrastructure, income stability and health outcomes. Logistic regression (see Methodology) indicates younger households perceive greater impacts (p < 0.05), informing targeted interventions.

Table 3 highlights the primary sources of financial difficulty reported by fishing households. Natural hazards (26.7%) and disease treatment costs (26.7%) emerged as the leading stressors, followed closely by family expenses (25.0%) and weather-related income loss (21.7%). These underscore the dual burden of environmental and health risks, necessitating policies like subsidized healthcare or sustainable fishing gear.

Table 3.

What are the reasons for financial difficulties

Reasons for financial difficultiesN%
Lost due to weather2521.6
Natural hazards3226.7
Pay for disease treatment3226.7
Expense for family3025.0
Source(s): Author’s work

Figure 4 complements this data by visually illustrating the distribution of financial stressors. Natural disasters and healthcare expenses dominate household concerns, indicating how climate change not only disrupts livelihoods directly but also exacerbates health vulnerabilities. Combined with family expenses and losses from extreme weather, these stressors present substantial obstacles to economic stability and long-term resilience among fishery-dependent populations. This highlights the need for integrated climate and health support systems.

Figure 4.

Bar chart showing causes of financial difficulties among fishery households

Source: Author’s work

Figure 4.

Bar chart showing causes of financial difficulties among fishery households

Source: Author’s work

Close modal

Table 4 presents the financial sources that fishery households rely on to support their fishing activities. The most frequently cited source is borrowing from banks (25.3%), followed by accessing funds, projects or programs (20.3%). Social organizations also play a significant role, providing financial support to 19.3% of households. In contrast, household savings (18.0%) and loans from relatives or friends (17.0%) are somewhat less common.

Table 4.

Which financial source do you use for the fishing activities

Financial sources N%
Borrow from the bank3025.3
Borrow from the social organization2319.3
Household financial source2118.0
Borrow money from relatives/friends2017.1
Borrow from funds, projects, programs2420.3
Source(s): Author’s work

These findings suggest that while formal financial institutions are a primary avenue for funding, community-based and informal mechanisms remain important – particularly for households with limited access to credit or government programs. The diversity of funding sources underscores the importance of promoting equitable, accessible and sustainable financing mechanisms for small-scale fishery households adapting to climate change.

Figure 5 highlights the diverse range of adaptive responses households employ in response to financial or environmental challenges. The largest group (23.0%) selected “Other” actions, suggesting that adaptation is often context-specific and may involve informal or unrecorded strategies. This is followed closely by households that pursue new employment opportunities (22.7%), seek support through social networks (19.0%), adopt alternative livelihoods (18.0%) or migrate (17.3%).

Figure 5.

Pie chart showing adaptation strategies to financial and environmental challenges among fishery households

Source: Author’s work

Figure 5.

Pie chart showing adaptation strategies to financial and environmental challenges among fishery households

Source: Author’s work

Close modal

As illustrated in Figure 6, employment change emerges as the most common proactive adaptation strategy, indicating that fishery households often respond to economic and climate stressors by shifting to more stable or better-paying jobs. While alternative livelihoods and reliance on social networks are also employed, they appear to be secondary options. The high proportion of “Other” responses points to the need for more localized research to better understand informal or undocumented adaptive behaviors.

Figure 6.

Bar chart showing severity of climate change impacts on fishery activities

Source: Author’s work

Figure 6.

Bar chart showing severity of climate change impacts on fishery activities

Source: Author’s work

Close modal

Thua Thien Hue, a highly climate-vulnerable province, faces intensifying natural disasters, including storms, floods, droughts and coastal erosion (Schmidt-Thomé et al., 2015). Meteorological data (1956–2022) reveal significant climate trends impacting fishery households in Phu Thuan Commune.

Figure 7 shows a long-term increase in annual average temperature, with stable conditions in the 1950s–1970s giving way to greater variability post-1980. From 2015 to 2022, the average temperature rose by 0.7°C, with 2019 recording a 1°C increase over 2010 (Figure 8). Peak temperatures in June and July approach 30°C, exacerbating heat stress for fishers and marine ecosystems.

Figure 7.

Annually average temperature from 1956 to 2022

Source: Author’s work

Figure 7.

Annually average temperature from 1956 to 2022

Source: Author’s work

Close modal
Figure 8.

Average minimum and maximum temperature in Thua Thien Hue from 2015 to 2022

Source: Author’s work

Figure 8.

Average minimum and maximum temperature in Thua Thien Hue from 2015 to 2022

Source: Author’s work

Close modal

Precipitation data (1956–2022) indicate rising variability, with consistent rainfall in earlier decades (1950s–1970s) shifting to pronounced wet-dry fluctuations from the 1980s (Figure 9). Notable peaks in 1999 and 2020 exceeded 5,000 mm and recent years (2015–2022) show more frequent above-average rainfall, particularly in 2020 and 2022. The rainy season (October–December) accounts for over 76% of annual rainfall, causing floods that damage aquaculture, infrastructure and household assets, whereas dry-season water shortages disrupt fishing (Binh et al., 2018; Figure 10).

Figure 9.

Annually precipitation in Thua Thien Hue 1956–2022

Source: Author’s work

Figure 9.

Annually precipitation in Thua Thien Hue 1956–2022

Source: Author’s work

Close modal
Figure 10.

Average precipitation by month in Thua Thien Hue in 2022

Source: Author’s work

Figure 10.

Average precipitation by month in Thua Thien Hue in 2022

Source: Author’s work

Close modal

Sea level rise, though not directly monitored in Thua Thien Hue, is evident in neighboring areas, with Son Tra (Da Nang) and Cua Viet (Quang Tri) recording 7–8 cm increases from 1998 to 2022 (Thuc et al., 2016). In 2020, sea level rise flooded 300 hectares in Thua Thien Hue. Projections estimate a 25 cm rise by 2050 and 70 cm by 2100, threatening coastal livelihoods and infrastructure. Phu Vang District, including Phu Thuan, also faces prolonged dry-season droughts (May–August), extended cold spells (October–December) and intensified storms, driven by saltwater intrusion and unpredictable weather patterns (Béné, 2009).

Focus group discussions (Table 6) reveal fishers’ perceptions of declining rainfall, hotter and more humid conditions and unpredictable storms and thunderstorms. While storm frequency has decreased, their intensity has risen, with two major storms in 2022 severely impacting Thua Thien Hue’s coast. Sudden thunderstorms pose risks to fishers’ safety and equipment, despite improved weather forecasting access (Allison et al., 2009). These climatic shifts reduce fishing seasons, damage gear and strain marine resources, underscoring the need for climate-resilient policies, such as enhanced early warning systems and sustainable fishery management, to support SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 14 (Life Below Water).

Table 6.

The manifestation of the climatic phenomenon in Thua Thien Hue Province

ClimaticManifestation
RainfallRain is getting less and less and mainly concentrates from September to December yearly. In 2019, there was not even rain in the summer. The rainy season also has less rain than the previous year. In 2020, heavy rain and floods were severe
TemperatureThe temperature is also quite erratic; some months are freezing, and others are hot and muggy. Temperatures are increasing compared to before, especially in the dry season
StormStorms tend to occur less frequently than before but are more intense and dangerous. Major storms such as Katsana (2009), Nockte (2016), and Storms No. 10 and No. 12 (2017) caused heavy damage to people, boats, roads and sea erosion
ThunderstormsThunderstorms at sea occur more erratically than before, causing risks to life and danger to people when fishing at sea
ErosionSea erosion occurs every year and dramatically affects households living along the coast
Source(s): In-depth interview and focus group discussion with the leaders of fishery association, local authorities and fishery households, 2024

A survey of 119 fishery households in Phu Thuan Commune assessed climate change impacts on various livelihood aspects using a 1–5 scale (1 = no impact, 5 = very severe). Quantitative analysis reveals severe effects on fishing boats and gear, human health and marine resources, with lesser impacts on infrastructure, housing and food security (Figure 11).

Figure 11.

Climate change impacts to fishers’ households

Source: Author’s work

Figure 11.

Climate change impacts to fishers’ households

Source: Author’s work

Close modal

Fishing boats and gear face the most severe impacts, with 23.5% of respondents rating effects as nearly very severe. Focus group discussions confirmed that unpredictable storms and thunderstorms since 2016 have caused significant gear damage, with local leaders reporting widespread boat losses during floods and storms. Human health is similarly affected (23.5% rated severe), driven by heat stress and thunderstorm risks. A fisher noted, “We used to fish for hours at sea, but now heat forces us to stop early.” Marine resources are also heavily impacted (21% rated severe), with focus groups reporting declining fish stocks and disappearing local species due to climate change and pollution (Elum and Snijder, 2023). Infrastructure, housing and food security face moderate impacts (rated not severe), though cumulative effects threaten household stability.

Nearly 90% of surveyed fishers reported reduced catches and income, driven by shorter fishing seasons, off-season rains and rising temperatures. Communication between boats and the mainland is unstable during disasters, exacerbating livelihood challenges. These findings highlight the need for policies promoting resilient fishing gear, early warning systems and sustainable marine resource management, aligning with SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 14 (Life Below Water).

Fishery households in Phu Thuan Commune employ diverse strategies to sustain livelihoods amid climate change and natural disaster risks (Table 7). Survey data from 119 households reveal that 21% sold larger vessels due to insufficient income, whereas 58% invested in fishing operations by purchasing gear, refurbishing boats, or adjusting fishing methods and timing. Field observations indicate a shift toward unsustainable practices, such as small-mesh nets, electric fishing devices and LED lights for squid in restricted zones (5–10 nautical miles), to offset declining catches. Fishers acknowledge these methods harm fish stocks but cite competition from over 100 large-powered boats from provinces like Quang Ngai and Binh Dinh, which encroach on Thuan An Sea fishing grounds, reducing nearshore resources and threatening safety (Hoang, 2021).

Table 7.

Adaptation activities in response to climate change

No.Adaptation activitiesNo. of HH n = 119%
1Selling assets (boats)3428.6
2Investment in fishing activities9680.6
3Investment in aquaculture21.7
4Investment in agriculture43.3
5Small business4739.4
6Looking for a full-time job (work as hired labor within the local area)4134.4
7Looking for a part-time job (seasonal labor outside the local area)5647.0
8Migrant1210.1
9Nothing97.5
Source(s): Field survey, 2024

Non-fishing activities supplement income for some households. Locally, 7% engage in farming or livestock raising, 6% run small-scale retail and 11% work as hired labor for construction or larger boats. Limited agricultural land restricts farming to small gardens for household use, and low local demand limits retail income. Non-local options are more common, with 47% pursuing seasonal labor elsewhere, 10.1% sending family members to urban or international labor markets and 4% working in major cities. Seasonal labor is preferred for its higher income and flexibility with fishing schedules. Approximately 7.5% of households report no specific adaptation activities, whereas 80% combine fishing and non-fishing strategies to diversify income.

These findings align with studies on climate-affected coastal communities in Vietnam and globally (Badjeck et al., 2010; Pham and Saizen, 2023; Alam and Mallick, 2022). Small-scale non-fishing activities, such as trading or services, remain supplementary due to their seasonal nature. Policies promoting sustainable fishing practices, equitable access to fishing grounds and vocational training for alternative livelihoods could enhance resilience, supporting SDG 1 (No Poverty) and SDG 14 (Life Below Water).

To examine how demographic and socioeconomic factors influence livelihood adaptation, 119 fishery households in Phu Thuan Commune were categorized into four groups: Group 1 (investing in fishing activities), Group 2 (investing in both fishing and non-fishing activities), Group 3 (investing in non-fishing activities) and Group 4 (no additional investment). Kruskal–Wallis tests reveal significant differences across groups for age, number of laborers, fishing experience, equipment ownership and social support access (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001; Table 8).

Table 8.

The difference between groups in climate change adaptation responses

Households characteristicsGroup 1
Invest in
Fishery (n = 33)
Group 2 Invest in both fishery
and non-fishery activities
(n = 27)
Group 3 Invest in
non-fishery
activities (n = 34)
Group 4 None
investment
(n = 25)
Age (year)***51.4 (32–65)51.9 (30–65)55.3 (36–65)60.8 (45–65)
Education level2.2 (1–4)2.4 (1–4)2.3 (1–4)2.3 (2–4)
Age of wife/husband***50.2 (30–65)50.2 (31–65)53.6 (25–65)59.6 (46–65)
Education of wife/husband2 (1–4)2.2 (1–4)2.1 (1–4)1.9 (1–3)
Number of members (person)4.8 (2–8)4.8 (3–8)4.9 (2–9)3.9 (2–8)
Labors (person)**2.3 (1–6)2.7 (2–7)2.7 (2–5)2.1 (2–3)
Year experience (years)***32.4 (10–55)319 (10–50)35.8 (15–50)43.4 (25–51)
Fishing gears and equipment***2.4 (1–4)2.6 (1–5)1.8 (1–4)1.3 (1–3)
Access to social support resources*3.2 (1–4)3.7 (2–4)3.4 (0–4)3.2 (0–4)

Note(s):

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Source(s): Field survey, 2024

Younger household heads (mean age ∼45 years) and spouses in Group 1 prioritize fishing investments, whereas older heads in Group 4 (mean age 60.8 years, spouse 59.6 years) often forgo adaptation (p < 0.001). Education levels, typically elementary to middle school, limit access to stable non-fishing jobs (p < 0.05). Focus groups noted that early school dropout (age 15–16) restricts fishers to low-paying labor, with Groups 2 and 3 relying on seasonal work. Households with more laborers (mean 2.7 in Groups 2 and 3 vs 2.3 in Group 1) diversify into non-fishing activities (p < 0.01). For example, a fisher shared, “My son and I fish, my wife sells fish, and our daughter works in the South for extra income.”

Longer fishing experience (p < 0.01) correlates with non-fishing activities or inaction (Group 4), as older fishers’ health declines, whereas less experienced fishers (Group 1) focus on fishing. Households with more equipment (e.g. boats, nets) invest in fishing or diversify (Groups 1 and 2; p < 0.001), unlike those with limited gear (Groups 3 and 4). Access to social support (p < 0.05), including relatives and organizations, boosts diversification (Groups 2 and 3), whereas Group 1 relies on fishing networks.

Local authorities provide technical support (e.g. flood control, boat anchoring guidance), but fishers prioritize livelihood-focused policies, such as job training, external employment information and fishing ground management to ensure safety and sustainability. These align with SDG 1 (No Poverty) and SDG 14 (Life Below Water), emphasizing equitable resource access and economic resilience.

Meteorological data (1956–2022) from Thua Thien Hue Province reveal rising temperatures, extended heatwaves, irregular rainfall and intensified storms and floods, severely impacting fishery households in Phu Thuan Commune (Thuc et al., 2016; Figures 7–10). Fishers report unpredictable weather shortening fishing seasons and increasing offshore risks, underscoring the vulnerability of traditional livelihoods to climate change (Tran et al., 2019; Weatherdon et al., 2016). This study identifies five critical impact areas: fishing equipment, human health, marine resources, infrastructure and food security, with the first three experiencing the most severe effects (Figure 11).

Fishing boats and gear are highly vulnerable, with 23.5% of 119 surveyed households reporting near-very-severe damage from storms and floods, escalating repair costs and constraining operations. Human health is similarly affected (23.5% rated severe), with heat stress and thunderstorm risks reducing fishing hours and increasing injury incidents (Hoang et al., 2022). Marine resources face significant declines, with 21% of respondents noting reduced fish stocks and disappearing species, driven by climate change, pollution and competition from large vessels (Elum and Snijder, 2023). Infrastructure and food security experience moderate impacts, but cumulative effects threaten household stability, with 90% of fishers reporting income losses.

Adaptation strategies vary (Table 7). While 58% of households invest in fishing (e.g. gear upgrades, adjusted methods), many adopt unsustainable practices like small-mesh nets, risking long-term marine ecosystems (Pham and Saizen, 2023). Non-fishing activities, including seasonal labor (47%), farming (7%), retail (6%) and urban/international migration (10.1%), provide supplementary income, but their small-scale, unstable nature limits effectiveness. Notably, 7.5% of households lack adaptation measures, highlighting vulnerability (Table 5).

Table 5.

Respond action

Respond actionN%
Finding the alternative livelihood2118.0
Looking for a new job2722.7
Migration2017.3
Finding the assistance from social networks (family, friends, peer)2219.0
Others2823.0
Source(s): Author’s work

Kruskal–Wallis tests (Table 8) reveal demographic influences on adaptation (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). Younger households with more laborers and equipment diversify into fishing and non-fishing activities, whereas older, labor-scarce households (mean age 60.8 years) remain passive. Low education (elementary to middle school) restricts access to stable jobs, forcing reliance on low-wage labor (Alam and Mallick, 2022). These findings align with global coastal communities, where resource constraints drive similar adaptations (Tran et al., 2019).

Policies promoting sustainable fishing practices, vocational training and equitable fishing ground access are critical to enhance resilience, aligning with SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 14 (Life Below Water). Local authorities’ technical measures (e.g. flood control) must shift toward livelihood-focused support, such as job creation and resource management, to address fishers’ needs and ensure sustainable development.

Figure 12 presents a graphical abstract summarizing the study’s findings on climate change impacts, adaptation strategies and policy solutions for fishery households in Phu Thuan Commune, aligning with SDGs 1, 13 and 14.

Figure 12.

Graphical abstract: Climate change impacts, adaptations and policy solutions for fishery households in Phu Thuan

Source: Author’s work

Figure 12.

Graphical abstract: Climate change impacts, adaptations and policy solutions for fishery households in Phu Thuan

Source: Author’s work

Close modal

This study highlights severe climate change impacts on fishery households in Phu Thuan Commune, including gear damage (23.5%), marine resource depletion (21%) and income losses (90%) (Figure 11). Methodological limitations require attention to strengthen future research. The sample size (n = 119) may not fully capture Phu Thuan’s diverse fishery households, potentially underestimating impacts like marine resource decline (21%). A larger, stratified sample could enhance statistical power and validate findings across socioeconomic groups. The focus on Phu Thuan limits generalizability, as Thua Thien Hue’s coastal communities vary in ecological conditions (e.g. lagoon vs open sea) and socioeconomic factors (e.g. market access). Demographic characteristics, such as age (mean 60.8 years in Group 4), low education (elementary to middle school) and fishing experience, shape perceptions (Table 8). Older fishers may underreport impacts due to adaptation fatigue or limited exposure to recent resource trends, introducing bias. Reliance on recent meteorological data (2015–2022) overlooks historical baselines, which could contextualize long-term resource declines. Subjective perceptions, influenced by recent extreme weather (e.g. 2020 floods; Figure 9), may prioritize short-term concerns. Future studies should employ longitudinal data, objective marine stock assessments and mixed-method approaches to triangulate fishers’ perceptions with ecological data, ensuring robust findings.

To enhance resilience, local authorities should implement livelihood-focused policies tailored to Phu Thuan’s needs. First, establish vocational training and job placement programs to address low education levels, enabling fishers to transition to stable non-fishing roles, such as aquaculture, eco-tourism, or coastal infrastructure maintenance. These programs could target younger fishers (mean age ∼45 years in Group 1), who show adaptability (Table 8). Second, enforce regulations on fishing grounds to limit encroachment by large vessels from provinces like Quang Ngai, which exacerbate nearshore resource depletion (Hoang, 2021). Equitable access to fishing zones would support small-scale fishers and conserve marine ecosystems. Third, provide subsidies for climate-resilient fishing gear (e.g. storm-resistant nets) and early warning systems to mitigate gear damage (23.5%) and safety risks from thunderstorms (Figure 11). These measures align with SDG 1 (No Poverty) by reducing economic vulnerability, SDG 13 (Climate Action) by enhancing adaptive capacity and SDG 14 (Life Below Water) by promoting sustainable fisheries.

Community-based initiatives are critical. Cooperative resource management groups could empower fishers to monitor marine stocks and adopt sustainable practices, reducing reliance on small-mesh nets (Pham and Saizen, 2023). Climate adaptation workshops, co-designed with fishers, could raise awareness of environmental protection and alternative livelihoods, supporting the 7.5% of households without adaptation strategies (Table 5). Nationally, Vietnam’s climate resilience strategies, such as the National Adaptation Plan and Fisheries Development Strategy 2030, should prioritize disadvantaged coastal communes like Phu Thuan. Funding for gear subsidies and training could be channeled through these programs, fostering economic stability, resource conservation and community empowerment for sustainable development in a changing climate.

This study demonstrates that climate change severely impacts fishery households in Phu Thuan Commune, with 23.5% reporting near-very-severe damage to fishing gear, 21% noting marine resource depletion and 90% experiencing income losses (Figure 11). Adaptation strategies, including gear upgrades (58%), seasonal labor (47%) and migration (10.1%), are constrained by limited resources, low education and labor scarcity (Tables 7, 8). While fishers proactively adapt, unsustainable practices like small-mesh nets and competition from large vessels threaten marine ecosystems (Pham and Saizen, 2023).

The effectiveness of adaptations depends on household resources – labor, equipment and social support (Hoa and Hà, 2015). Younger, labor-rich households diversify livelihoods, whereas older households (mean age 60.8 years) remain passive (Table 8). Local authorities’ technical support (e.g. flood control) falls short of fishers’ needs for stable income and safety (Thi Lan Huong et al., 2017). To enhance resilience, policies should prioritize:

  • vocational training to improve job access, addressing low education levels;

  • subsidies for resilient gear and early warning systems to reduce losses (23.5% gear damage);

  • regulated fishing grounds to curb external vessel intrusion, protecting nearshore resources; and

  • community-based education on sustainable fishing and climate change, boosting awareness (Nguyen et al., 2014).

These measures align with SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 14 (Life Below Water), fostering economic stability and marine sustainability. Fishing supports livelihoods and Vietnam’s coastal security, necessitating national strategies to ensure safe, sustainable practices. Future research should explore longitudinal impacts and scalable solutions across Thua Thien Hue, amplifying fishers’ resilience in a changing climate.

The authors gratefully recognize the farmers who participated in the study for their assistance in gathering data for this work, as well as the research fund received from the Wallonie Bruxelles International for Project 7.2 strengthen the capacity of training and research to mitigate the impact of climate change between University of Economics, Hue University (Vietnam) and University of Liège (Belgium).

Declarations:

Funding statement: This research was funded by the Wallonia-Brussels International (WBI) Belgium, through the Bilateral Cooperation Agreement Wallonia–Brussels/Vietnam, 2022–2024 – Project 7.2: “Capacity building in training and research to mitigate the impacts of climate change in the sandy coastal areas of Central Vietnam”.

Ethical approval: This research was done in compliance to the recommended Code of Ethical Conduct for Research on Human Subjects. Approval for the research protocol was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Hue University, Vietnam. Permission from all participants was sought and their privacy and identities were preserved when data was being collected and analyzed.

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Aboye
,
A.B.
,
Kinsella
,
J.
and
Mega
,
T.L.
(
2023
), “
Farm households’ adaptive strategies in response to climate change in lowlands of Southern Ethiopia
”,
International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management
, Vol.
15
No.
5
, pp.
579
-
598
.
Alam
,
E.
and
Mallick
,
B.
(
2022
), “
Climate change perceptions, impacts and adaptation practices of fishers in southeast Bangladesh Coast
”,
International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management
, Vol.
14
No.
2
, pp.
191
-
211
.
Alcantara
,
L.B.
,
Creencia
,
L.A.
,
Madarcos
,
J.R.V.
,
Madarcos
,
K.G.
,
Jontila
,
J.B.S.
and
Culhane
,
F.
(
2023
), “
Climate change awareness and risk perceptions in the coastal marine ecosystem of Palawan, Philippines
”,
UCL Open Environment
, Vol.
5
.
Allison
,
E.H.
,
Beveridge
,
M.C.
and
Van Brakel
,
M.
(
2009
), “
Climate change, small-scale fisheries and smallholder aquaculture
”,
Fish, Trade and Development
, Vol.
20
No.
3
, pp.
73
-
87
.
Ayad
,
H.A.
and
Lefilef
,
A.
(
2025
), “
Unveiling new insights into China’s marine ecosystem: exploring the fishing grounds load capacity curve
”,
Journal of Cleaner Production
, Vol.
450
,
available at:
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S09596526240095574
Badjeck
,
M.C.
,
Allison
,
E.H.
,
Halls
,
A.S.
and
Dulvy
,
N.K.
(
2010
), “
Impacts of climate variability and change on fishery-based livelihoods
”,
Marine Policy
, Vol.
34
No.
3
, pp.
375
-
383
.
Barros
,
V.R.
(
2014
), “
Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Working Group II contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
”, (
No Title
).
Béné
,
C.
(
2009
), “
Are fishers poor or vulnerable? Assessing economic vulnerability in small-scale fishing communities
”,
The Journal of Development Studies
, Vol.
45
No.
6
, pp.
911
-
933
.
Brander
,
K.
,
Cochrane
,
K.
,
Barange
,
M.
and
Soto
,
D.
(
2017
), “
Climate change implications for fisheries and aquaculture
”,
Climate Change Impacts on Fisheries and Aquaculture: A Global Analysis
, Vol.
1
, pp.
45
-
62
.
Creswell
,
J.W.
and
Clark
,
V.L.P.
(
2017
), “
Designing and conducting mixed methods research
”,
Sage Publications
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
.
Elum
,
Z.A.
and
Snijder
,
M.
(
2023
), “
Climate change perception and adaptation among farmers in coastal communities of Bayelsa state, Nigeria: a photovoice study
”,
International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management
, Vol.
15
No.
5
, pp.
745
-
767
.
Erzini
,
K.
(
2020
), “
Editorial: marine protected areas and small-scale fisheries
”,
Aquaculture and Fisheries
, Vol.
5
No.
5
, doi: .
Galappaththi
,
E.K.
,
Ford
,
J.D.
and
Bennett
,
E.M.
(
2019
), “
A framework for assessing community adaptation to climate change in a fisheries context
”,
Environmental Science and Policy
, Vol.
92
, pp.
17
-
26
.
Hagedoorn
,
L.C.
,
Bubeck
,
P.
,
Hudson
,
P.
,
Brander
,
L.M.
,
Pham
,
M.
and
Lasage
,
R.
(
2021
), “
Preferences of vulnerable social groups for ecosystem-based adaptation to flood risk in Central Vietnam
”,
World Development
, Vol.
148
, p.
105650
.
Hoa
,
ĐT.
and
,
Q.Đ.
(
2015
), “
Cơsở lý luận và thực tiễn về sự thích ứng với biến đổi khí hậu trong sản xuất nông nghiệp của người dân ven biển
”,
Tạp Chí Khoa Học và Công Nghệ Lâm Nghiệp
, No.
1
, pp.
116
-
124
.
Hoang
,
T.
(
2021
), “
Social-ecological dynamics and livelihood trajectories in small-scale fisheries in coastal Vietnam
”,
The UWA Profiles and Research Repository
, doi: .
Hoang
,
H.D.
,
Momtaz
,
S.
and
Schreider
,
M.
(
2022
), “
Understanding small-scale fishers’ perceptions on climate shocks and their impacts on local fisheries livelihoods: insights from the Central Coast, Vietnam
”,
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
, Vol.
79
, p.
103152
.
Hobday
,
A.J.
,
Spillman
,
C.M.
,
Eveson
,
J.P.
,
Hartog
,
J.R.
,
Zhang
,
X.
and
Brodie
,
S.
(
2018
), “
A framework for combining seasonal forecasts and climate projections to aid risk management for fisheries and aquaculture
”,
Frontiers in Marine Science
, Vol.
5
, p.
331717
.
Huynh
,
P.T.
,
Le
,
N.D.
,
Le
,
S.T.
and
Nguyen
,
H.X.
(
2021
), “
Vulnerability of fishery-based livelihoods to climate change in coastal communities in Central Vietnam
”,
Coastal Management
, Vol.
49
No.
3
, pp.
275
-
292
.
Islam
,
M.M.
,
Barman
,
A.
,
Kundu
,
G.K.
,
Kabir
,
M.A.
and
Paul
,
B.
(
2019
), “
Vulnerability of inland and coastal aquaculture to climate change: evidence from a developing country
”,
Aquaculture and Fisheries
, Vol.
4
No.
5
, pp.
183
-
189
.
Nguyen
,
T.A.
,
Huynh
,
H.T.L.
,
Dang
,
T.Q.
,
Pannier
,
E.
,
Vu
,
T.C.
,
Tessier
,
O.
,
Thao
,
N.C.
,
Anh
,
P.P.
,
Tam
,
P.T.K.
,
Nguyen
,
P.T.
and
Pham
,
L.B.
(
2014
), “
Climate change adaptation policies in Viet Nam
”.
Pham
,
T.L.
and
Saizen
,
I.
(
2023
), “
Coastal fishers’ livelihood adaptations to extreme weather events: an analysis of household strategies in Quang Ngai province, Vietnam
”,
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
, Vol.
10
No.
1
, pp.
1
-
12
.
Pham
,
M.H.
,
Panfili
,
J.
,
Simier
,
M.
,
Sindou
,
P.
,
Hoang
,
D.H.
and
Durand
,
J.
(
2023
), “
Spatial and temporal diversity of fish captured by light traps in various habitats in coastal waters in the oldest marine protected area in Vietnam and its implications for conservation
”,
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
, Vol.
34
No.
1
, doi: .
Pomeroy
,
R.
,
Thi Nguyen
,
K.A.
and
Thong
,
H.X.
(
2009
), “
Small-scale marine fisheries policy in Vietnam
”,
Marine Policy
, Vol.
33
No.
2
, pp.
419
-
428
, doi: .
Schleyer-Lindenmann
,
A.
,
Mudaliar
,
R.
,
Rishi
,
P.
and
Robert
,
S.
(
2022
), “
Climate change and adaptation to coastal risks as perceived in two major coastal cities: an exploratory study in Marseilles and Nice (France)
”,
Ocean and Coastal Management
, Vol.
225
, p.
106209
.
Schmidt-Thomé
,
P.
,
Nguyen
,
T.H.
,
Pham
,
T.L.
,
Jarva
,
J.
,
Nuottimäki
,
K.
,
Schmidt-Thome
,
P.
,
Nguyen
,
T.H.
,
Pham
,
T.L.
,
Jarva
,
J.
and
Nuottimäki
,
K.
(
2015
),
Climate Change in Vietnam
,
Springer
, pp.
7
-
15
.
Thi Lan Huong
,
N.
,
Shun Bo
,
Y.
and
Fahad
,
S.
(
2017
), “
Farmers’ perception, awareness and adaptation to climate change: evidence from northwest Vietnam
”,
International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management
, Vol.
9
No.
4
, pp.
555
-
576
, doi: .
Thuc
,
T.
,
Van Thang
,
N.
,
Huynh Thi Lan
,
H.
,
Van Khiem
,
M.
,
Hien
,
N.X.
and
Phong
,
D.H.
(
2016
), “
Climate change and sea level rise scenarios for Vietnam
”,
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment
,
Hanoi, Vietnam
,
available at:
www.imh.ac.vn/files/doc/2017/Thang01/CCS_SPM_Jan%2011_ok.pdf
Thuy
,
N.T.T.
,
Giang
,
N.T.H.
,
Hoai
,
H.T.T.
and
Van Dan
,
T.
(
2017
), “
Impact of climate change on aquaculture in Phu Vang district, Thua Thien Hue province, Vietnam
”,
Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA)
, pp.
1
-
51
.
Tran
,
H.
,
Nguyen
,
Q.
and
Kervyn
,
M.
(
2017
), “
Household social vulnerability to natural hazards in the coastal tran van thoi district, Ca Mau province, mekong Delta, Vietnam
”,
Journal of Coastal Conservation
, Vol.
21
No.
4
, pp.
489
-
503
, doi: .
Tran
,
T.K.V.
,
Elahi
,
E.
,
Zhang
,
L.
,
Magsi
,
H.
,
Pham
,
Q.T.
and
Hoang
,
T.M.
(
2019
), “
Historical perspective of climate change in sustainable livelihoods of coastal areas of the red river Delta, Nam Dinh, Vietnam
”,
International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management
, Vol.
11
No.
5
, pp.
687
-
695
, doi: .
Weatherdon
,
L.V.
,
Magnan
,
A.K.
,
Rogers
,
A.D.
,
Sumaila
,
U.R.
and
Cheung
,
W.W.L.
(
2016
), “
Observed and projected impacts of climate change on marine fisheries, aquaculture, coastal tourism, and human health: an update
”,
Frontiers in Marine Science
, Vol.
3
, doi: .
White
,
A.T.
,
Eisma-Osorio
,
R.-L.
and
Green
,
S.J.
(
2005
), “
Integrated coastal management and marine protected areas: complementarity in the Philippines
”,
Ocean and Coastal Management
, Vol.
48
Nos
11/12
, pp.
948
-
971
, doi: .
Dendir
,
Z.
and
Simane
,
B.
(
2021
), “
Farmers’ perceptions about changes in climate variables: perceived risks and household responses in different agro-ecological communities, Southern Ethiopia
”,
Climate Services
, Vol.
22
, p.
100236
.
Dubey
,
S.K.
,
Trivedi
,
R.K.
,
Chand
,
B.K.
,
Mandal
,
B.
and
Rout
,
S.K.
(
2017
), “
Farmers’ perceptions of climate change, impacts on freshwater aquaculture and adaptation strategies in climatic change hotspots: a case of the Indian Sundarban Delta
”,
Environmental Development
, Vol.
21
, pp.
38
-
51
.
FAO
(
2020
), “
The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020
”,
Rome
:
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
, doi: .
Ho
,
N.T.T.
,
Ross
,
H.
and
Coutts
,
J.
(
2016
), “
Evaluation of social and ecological outcomes of fisheries co-management in Tam Giang Lagoon, Vietnam
”,
Fisheries Research
, Vol.
174
, pp.
151
-
159
.
Hong
,
N.T.K.
,
Hien
,
P.T.T.
,
Thu
,
T.T.N.
and
Lebailly
,
P.
(
2017
), “
Vietnam’s fisheries and aquaculture development’s policy: are exports performance targets sustainable?
”,
Oceanography and Fisheries Open Access Journal
, Vol.
5
No.
4
.
Makame
,
O.M.
and
Salum
,
L.A.
(
2021
), “
Vulnerability of fishing and fisheries sector to climate change and non-climate risks as perceived by fishermen in Zanzibar coastal villages
”,
Carnets de Recherches de L’océan Indien
, No.
7
, pp.
165
-
183
.
PV District People Committee
(
2023
), “Report on the Socio-economic development plan of Phu Vang district” (hard copy).
Sanjoto
,
T.B.
,
Sari
,
H.A.
and
Hardati
,
P.
(
2021
), “
Fishermen adaptation to climate change in Mertasinga village, Gunungjati Sub-District, Cirebon regency
”,
International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning
, Vol.
16
No.
5
, pp.
869
-
874
.
Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence maybe seen at Link to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licenceLink to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licence.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal