Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This study aims to investigate the perspectives of university teaching assistants (TAs) regarding their preparedness to implement culturally responsive pedagogy (CRP) in undergraduate instruction. It aims to understand the extent to which TAs from Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and non-STEM fields feel equipped to apply CRP principles and identify gaps in their training and support.

Design/methodology/approach

A qualitative case study design was employed, involving individual semi-structured interviews with 30 university TAs. Thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase framework, was used to analyze the transcribed interviews. Additionally, Bartlett and Vavrus’ (2017) comparative case study method supported an in-depth examination of differences and similarities in TA responses across disciplines.

Findings

The findings indicate that most participants had received limited or no formal training on how to integrate CRP into their teaching. TAs expressed uncertainty about effective strategies for incorporating culturally responsive approaches, with notable variations in experience between STEM and Non-STEM participants. These results highlight a significant gap in TAs’ professional preparation for inclusive pedagogy.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the literature on CRP in higher education by centering the often-overlooked voices of TAs. It identifies specific areas for institutional improvement in TA training and offers insight into disciplinary differences in CRP engagement, informing future efforts in inclusive teaching development.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal