Article navigation
Purpose

This study investigates patterns of strengths and weaknesses in incident command performance across UK Fire and Rescue Services (FRS) and explores how these insights can support the development of evidence-informed training and development strategies.

Design/methodology/approach

Assessment data from 43 UK FRSs were analysed, incorporating formal exercises, real-incident monitoring and structured training events across four command levels (ICL1–ICL4). Using behavioural markers from the Effective Command framework, the study examined competence profiles and recurring performance themes.

Findings

Strengths were consistently observed in early situational information gathering, while deficits in anticipation, communication and risk assessment were common, particularly among less experienced commanders. Novice officers tended to rely on procedural checklists, whereas experienced commanders demonstrated more intuitive, adaptive decision-making. These patterns indicate the need for differentiated, level-specific training interventions.

Practical implications

Findings show how documented assessment data can strengthen both individual development plans and organisational strategies for enhancing and sustaining command competence.

Originality/value

The study provides empirical evidence on variations in incident command competence and demonstrates how structured assessment data can be used to inform organisational learning and guide training priorities in emergency services.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options