This study examines how highly “hotelized” hospital servicescapes may unintentionally weaken procedural compliance and patient safety by reshaping patients' role perceptions from “patient” to “guest.” More specifically, it explores whether the over-optimization of comfort, hospitality and experiential design can generate behavioral dissonance and activate hospitality-consistent scripts that conflict with institutional healthcare norms. The paper introduces “experiential over-softening” as a provisional boundary condition of servicescape theory, suggesting that experiential enhancement and procedural integrity may relate in a non-linear manner within high-reliability service contexts.
The study adopts an interpretivist, abductive qualitative design grounded in narrative inquiry. Empirical material derives from a single theoretically revelatory retrospective narrative involving a patient who unintentionally bypassed formal hospital discharge procedures in a luxury hospital environment. The analysis combines abductive narrative interpretation with cognitive dissonance mapping to reconstruct a theoretically plausible mechanism linking servicescape cues, symbolic role reinterpretation and protocol deviation. Rather than testing causal relationships, the study seeks analytical generalization and hypothesis generation through iterative dialogue between empirical material and competing theoretical lenses.
The findings suggest that highly hospitality-oriented hospital environments may reorganize the salience of competing role-consistent cognitions, amplifying “guest” scripts while attenuating institutional “patient” norms. Within this symbolic configuration, the patient's autonomous exit became situationally coherent rather than consciously deviant. The analysis indicates that environmental cues may function not only as experiential stimuli, but also as carriers of institutional meaning capable of reshaping role expectations and behavioral intelligibility. The study therefore proposes “experiential over-softening” as a provisional boundary condition of servicescape theory, highlighting a possible non-linear relationship between experiential enhancement and procedural compliance in high-reliability contexts.
The originality of this study lies in identifying and theorizing a previously underexplored paradox within experiential service design: the possibility that excessive experiential enhancement may weaken procedural integrity in high-reliability systems. The paper advances servicescape theory by introducing “experiential over-softening” as a hypothesis-generating boundary condition and by conceptualizing the servicescape as a carrier of institutional meaning rather than merely an affective stimulus. It also offers a novel abductive integration of servicescape theory, hospitality healthscapes, institutional logics and cognitive dissonance to explain how environmental cues may render protocol deviation situationally intelligible.
