Aims to identify the positive and negative impact that the NHS Clinical Governance Support Team’s (CGST) Clinical Governance Development Programme (CGDP) was perceived to have (or failed to have) on delegates, working practices and work relationships. Data were collected with a random sample of 500 delegates who had participated in the CGDP. Indicates that the CGDP was successful in meeting its aims, with participants reporting that their views or behaviours had changed on a number of items. Subjects reported an increase in their skills, knowledge, clarity and structure in their work and improved communication between clinical teams. Participation in the CGDP had a positive impact on the individuals’ professional development. Major benefits were reported as: networking and sharing with other professionals from a diverse range of clinical and geographical areas, taking time to reflect and plan, and development of a new set of skills. Some participants who reported little or no progress attributed the main factors hindering change to shortage of time, resources, workforce migration and the debilitating impact of continuous change in the NHS.
Article navigation
1 September 2003
This article was originally published in
Clinical Governance: An International Journal
Case Report|
September 01 2003
Making an impact: exploring delegates’ perceptions of the clinical governance development programme
Grace Sweeney;
Grace Sweeney
Research Fellow, at The Research & Development Support Unit, Exeter, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Annie Ellis
Annie Ellis
Lecturer is Co‐ordinator, at The Research & Development Support Unit, Exeter, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6038
Print ISSN: 1477-7274
© MCB UP Limited
2003
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (2003) 8 (3): 262–270.
Citation
Sweeney G, Ellis A (2003), "Making an impact: exploring delegates’ perceptions of the clinical governance development programme". Clinical Governance: An International Journal, Vol. 8 No. 3 pp. 262–270, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14777270310487093
Download citation file:
135
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
What do NHS staff think and know about clinical governance?
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (September,2004)
Implementing clinical governance – results of a year’s programme of semi‐structured visits to assess the development of clinical governance in West Midlands Trusts
British Journal of Clinical Governance (September,2002)
Sense making of clinical governance at different levels in NHS hospital trusts
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (April,2009)
Do different approaches to clinical governance development and implementation make a difference? Findings from Ireland and New Zealand
J Health Organ Manag (October,2017)
Clinical governance: its origins and its foundations
British Journal of Clinical Governance (September,2000)
Related Chapters
It’s Terrible Having No Job, People Look Down on You and You’ve Never Enough Money: Lowestoft Case Study
Inequalities in the UK: New Discourses, Evolutions and Actions
Convenience Orientation in the 21st Century: Qualitative Insights from Interviews with Consumers and Marketing Professionals
Qualitative Consumer Research
The Voice of Patients and the Public in the National Health Service: Issues of Implementation
Conceptualizing and Researching Governance in Public and Non-Profit Organizations
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
