Open figure viewer
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the recent codification of the duties of nominee directors in Malaysia.
Design/methodology/approach
Comparative law and legal theory.
Findings
The paper finds that the Malaysian approach to the duties of nominee directors is overly prescriptive and inconsistent with commercial reality.
Practical implications
A review of the law on the duties of nominee directors in Malaysia is called for.
Originality/value
This paper highlights the need for clear law reform objectives and made comparisons of the law across jurisdictions.
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2008
You do not currently have access to this content.
