This paper investigates which company characteristics affect the decision to introduce profit‐sharing. Unlike most studies, this paper relies on a ten‐year panel. The results presented in this paper are based on the estimation of a panel data fixed‐effect logit model. Given that they are immune from heterogeneity bias, it is believed that these results are more reliable than those obtained by estimating cross‐sectional models. These results are in line with the common findings of the literature. Companies that are more likely to introduce profit‐sharing (PS) are larger firms which invest more, due to the lower cost of debt, and tend to pay higher wages as an incentive to boost the initially lower productivity. These companies are more likely to undertake investment projects which support the interpretation of PS as a risk‐sharing device.
Article navigation
1 July 2004
Literature Review|
July 01 2004
Profit related pay in Italy: A microeconometric analysis
Gianni Amisano;
Gianni Amisano
Department of Economics, Università di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Alessandra Del Boca
Alessandra Del Boca
Department of Economics, Università di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6577
Print ISSN: 0143-7720
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2004
International Journal of Manpower (2004) 25 (5): 463–478.
Citation
Amisano G, Del Boca A (2004), "Profit related pay in Italy: A microeconometric analysis". International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 25 No. 5 pp. 463–478, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720410554160
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Attitudes towards benefits among entrepreneurial employees
Personnel Review (December,2003)
Pay systems in Chinese state‐owned enterprises: a review
Chinese Management Studies (October,2009)
Who pays for performance?
International Journal of Manpower (March,2008)
Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations: A comparative study of Chinese and US managers
Employee Relations: The International Journal (August,1997)
The moderating role of individual‐difference variables in compensation research
Journal of Managerial Psychology (January,2006)
Related Chapters
Chapter 16 Retaliatory Trade Measures in the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Are There Really Alternatives?
Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment
Chapter 1 Compensation, Reward, and the Measurement of Unfair Inequalities
Inequality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement
It is not about Compensation: Resolving Customer Complaints in
Hospitality Management
Trade Tales: Decoding Customers' Stories
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
