Purpose – The study sets out to examine the influence of individual factors (enjoyment in helping others and knowledge self‐efficacy), organizational factors (top management support and organizational rewards) and technology factors (information and communication technology use) on knowledge sharing processes and whether more leads to superior firm innovation capability. Design/methodology/approach – Based on a survey of 172 employees from 50 large organizations in Taiwan, this study applies the structural equation modeling (SEM) to investigate the research model. Findings – The results show that two individual factors (enjoyment in helping others and knowledge self‐efficacy) and one of the organizational factors (top management support) significantly influence knowledge‐sharing processes. The results also indicate that employee willingness to both donate and collect knowledge enable the firm to improve innovation capability. Research limitations/implications – Future research can examine how personal traits (such as age, level of education, and working experiences) and organizational characteristics (such as firm size and industry type) may moderate the relationships between knowledge enablers and processes. Practical implications – From a practical perspective, the relationships among knowledge‐sharing enablers, processes, and firm innovation capability may provide a clue regarding how firms can promote knowledge‐sharing culture to sustain their innovation performance. Originality/value – The findings of this study provide a theoretical basis, and simultaneously can be used to analyze relationships among knowledge‐sharing factors, including enablers, processes, and firm innovation capability. From a managerial perspective, this study identified several factors essential to successful knowledge sharing, and discussed the implications of these factors for developing organizational strategies that encourage and foster knowledge sharing.
Article navigation
19 June 2007
Editors
Research Article|
June 19 2007
Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study Available to Purchase
Hsiu‐Fen Lin
Hsiu‐Fen Lin
Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6577
Print ISSN: 0143-7720
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2007
International Journal of Manpower (2007) 28 (3-4): 315–332.
Citation
Svetlik I, Stavrou‐Costea E, Lin H (2007), "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study". International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 28 No. 3-4 pp. 315–332, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755272
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
The influence of knowledge sharing on innovation
European Business Review (May,2010)
How transactive memory systems relate to organizational innovation: the mediating role of developmental leadership
Journal of Knowledge Management (September,2016)
Analysing the role of business intelligence, knowledge sharing and organisational innovation on gaining competitive advantage
Journal of Workplace Learning (May,2017)
Effects of socio‐technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing
Management Decision (January,2006)
Examining the nexus: supply chain quality management, knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and strategic business performance
Industrial Management & Data Systems (March,2025)
Related Chapters
Acquiring Firm-Specific Advantages: Organizational Innovation and Internationalization at Indian Multinational Corporations
Emerging Market Firms in the Global Economy
Entrepreneurial University and Organizational Innovation: The Case of Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain
Management and Administration of Higher Education Institutions at Times of Change
Organizational Resilience: Antecedents, Consequences, and Practical Implications – for Managers and Change Leaders
Research in Organizational Change and Development
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
