A primary function of the Performance Measurement System is to provide employees with information on their past performance, allowing them to assess the outcomes of their actions, and therefore if they are meeting or not the objectives they are given. This work aims at contributing to the understanding of how the effectiveness of performance feedback information can be improved by defining a set of distinct performance feedback dimensions based on a PMS literature review, and by validating it empirically on an international sample of 164 manufacturing organisations. The proposed dimensions are: relevance as performance feedback orientation to the achievement of objectives; dynamic adjustment of performance feedback; relevance as usefulness of cost performance feedback; relevance as usefulness of non‐cost performance feedback; timeliness of shop‐floor performance feedback; personal performance feedback; and feedback on the overall process performances. The analysis shows that these dimensions are distinct, thus allowing to deal with them separately both in PMS design and audit. As far as the effectiveness of the performance feedback is concerned, it emerges that for several dimensions higher scores are associated to higher operating performances (cost, time and quality), but in one case this only holds for managers and in another one only for supervisors.
Article navigation
1 March 2000
Literature Review|
March 01 2000
Assessing some distinctive dimensions of performance feedback information in high performing plants Available to Purchase
Cipriano Forza;
Cipriano Forza
University of Padova, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Fabrizio Salvador
Fabrizio Salvador
University of Padova, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6593
Print ISSN: 0144-3577
© MCB UP Limited
2000
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (2000) 20 (3): 359–385.
Citation
Forza C, Salvador F (2000), "Assessing some distinctive dimensions of performance feedback information in high performing plants". International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 3 pp. 359–385, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010308112
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Auditing Performance – An Alternative Approach
Management Decision (April,1989)
Making Best Use of Performance Measures and Information
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (September,1994)
The challenge of Daisyworld
Kybernetes (October,1996)
The forgotten wait: official waiting times often misleading
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (June,2003)
Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (May,1997)
Related Chapters
Replacing Traditional Economics with Behavioral Assumptions in Constructing the Uppsala Model: Toward a Theory on the Evolution of the Multinational Business Enterprise (MBE)
Multidisciplinary Insights from New AIB Fellows
A first attempt to identify and classify empirical studies on history in mathematics education
Crossroads in History of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Performance Management: A Marriage between Practice and Science – Just Say “I do”
Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
