Work sampling focuses mainly on determining the proportion of times for a specified category within a predetermined tolerance at a specified statistical risk. Conventional practices are based on numerous snap (instantaneous) observations taken randomly. This study employs the extensively used method of “production study” or so‐called continuous observation work sampling (COWS). Data from continuous observation of activity are used to make point estimates of the average time spent in each category and also the proportion of time occupied by a specified category. This study concentrates mainly on determining and verifying the interval estimates that derived from two different process assumptions, alternating Poisson process (APP) and alternating unspecified process (AUP), for a proportion when using COWS. Simulation results indicate that the confidence interval formulae derived for AUP assumptions are robust if the sample sizes for both modes exceed 100. Although the exact formulae are derived from APP, poor results yield if the true process deviated from APP.
Article navigation
Research Article|
February 01 2001
Continuous observation work sampling and its verification
Cheng‐pin Ho;
Cheng‐pin Ho
Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial Management, Huafan University, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan, Republic of China. cpho@huafan.hfu.edu.tw
Search for other works by this author on:
Elinor S. Pape
Elinor S. Pape
Professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA. pape@imse.uta.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7190
Print ISSN: 0043-8022
© MCB UP Limited
2001
Work Study (2001) 50 (1): 23–30.
Citation
Ho C, Pape ES (2001), "Continuous observation work sampling and its verification". Work Study, Vol. 50 No. 1 pp. 23–30, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00438020110363757
Download citation file:
305
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Investigating business processes: does process simplification always work?
Business Process Management Journal (June,1998)
Production Management: A Two‐dimensional Function?
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (July,1991)
A Review of Multi‐stage Lot‐sizing Models
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (September,1990)
A maintenance model for quality management
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (October,2000)
Controlling a Robotic Cell by Dynamic Rule Despatching– A Simulation Study
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (April,1990)
Related Chapters
The Best-Laid Plans of Mice and Men often go Awry: The Disadvantages of Project Management
Project Management in the Library Workplace
Meta-Analytic Methods
Safe Mobility: Challenges, Methodology and Solutions
Analyzing Enacted Curriculum: Seven Lessons Learned From Collecting, Coding, and Analyzing Large Sets of Qualitative Data
Lessons Learned From Research on Mathematics Curriculum
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
