Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This study investigates performance differences among various types of investment entities in Japan’s asset management industry – specifically domestic financial institutions, foreign financial institutions and independent firms – focusing on the operational realities that remain largely underexplored in academic research.

Design/methodology/approach

The study employs a stochastic frontier analysis based on input distance functions to assess efficiency and economies of scale across different types of asset management companies.

Findings

Small, independent asset management firms not affiliated with financial institutions tend to exhibit higher efficiency and stronger economies of scale, whereas firms established by foreign financial institutions demonstrate relatively lower performance.

Practical implications

The findings challenge the dominance of subsidiaries of major domestic financial institutions in Japan's asset management industry by highlighting the competitive advantages of smaller, independent firms. They suggest a need for policy and strategic shifts to foster a more diverse and efficient asset management ecosystem.

Originality/value

By examining efficiency across different ownership structures, this study challenges the prevailing dominance of subsidiaries affiliated with major domestic financial groups in Japan. The results contribute to the literature on organizational efficiency in financial services and provide insights for aligning performance management practices with ownership structures, offering implications for both theory and managerial practice.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal