The possibilities for good governance depends on institutional structures and the economic resources available for ensuring governance. In some cases centralised governance structures are inefficient. In other cases, decentralised structures turn out to be inadequate. In India decentralisation of power to village level has not improved the efficiency of rural development. Decentralisation of power, it is said, by facilitating the empowerment of people in local communities can contribute to more sustainable development. On the other hand, in India, the delegation of power to the states in some cases has resulted in the destruction of the environment. Thus centralised and decentralised governance structure have both merits and demerits. Preservation of the environment which is essential for sustainable development cannot be achieved unless the pressure on forest and natural resources is reduced. This cannot happen in the absence of appropriate property rights of local communities and of rural women. In West Bengal as well as in the central Himalayan region in India it has been found that the disappearance of community control and restrictions on the user rights of villagers reduced the incentive and ability of villagers to use forest sustainability. On the other hand, in Russia, pristine forests are being degraded because of lack of resources of the weak central government. Good governance also depends on appropriate institutions. Corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, inefficient and corrupt law enforcement agencies undermine the capacity of institutions to facilitate good governance for sustainable development. Corruption and rent seeking activities can grow even in an economy which has tried to apply outward oriented economic policies if an appropriate institutional environment does not exist. A state which assumes predatory or semi‐predatory status can systematically incapacitate all institutions for good governance and effective implementation of policies. Thus formulation of policies cannot ensure effective implementation in the absence of good governance which in turn cannot be achieved in the absence of appropriate institutions. Hence, sustainable development requires good policies and effective provision of institutions conducive to good governance.
Article navigation
1 July 1998
Viewpoint|
July 01 1998
Good governance in sustainable development: the impact of institutions
K.C. Roy;
K.C. Roy
The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
C.A. Tisdell
C.A. Tisdell
The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6712
Print ISSN: 0306-8293
© MCB UP Limited
1998
International Journal of Social Economics (1998) 25 (6-7-8): 1310–1325.
Citation
Roy K, Tisdell C (1998), "Good governance in sustainable development: the impact of institutions". International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 25 No. 6-7-8 pp. 1310–1325, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299810212775
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Institutional economics and economic development: The theory of property rights, economic development, good governance and the environment
International Journal of Social Economics (June,2003)
Property management as property rights governance: Exclusion and internal conflict resolution
Property Management (March,2006)
Managing community in Hong Kong – the political economy perspective
Property Management (April,2005)
Private property rights, culture, property management and sustainable development
Property Management (March,2006)
Research on school‐based management in Victoria
Journal of Educational Administration (March,1996)
Related Chapters
Health, safety and welfare
Initial Professional Development for Civil Engineers
Sustainable development
Initial Professional Development for Civil Engineers
RAMP Seminar Thursday 1st April
RAMP Study Seminar
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
