There is a double crisis in modern science and in particular in physics and mechanics. Among others Einstein and Stephane Lupasco, in the 1930s, warned about this crisis. The Quantum Theory cannot be reconciled with the Relativity Theory. Specifically there is a gap(cleavage) between micro – and macro‐physics and mechanics. Parallel or beneath there is also a second crisis derived from a discontinuity (again a cleavage) between classical and modern science,that is between two previous revolutions. A new research programme of a simultaneous equilibrium versus disequilibrium approach, initially applied in economics has now been extended to include natural sciences. It is the question of a new, more comprehensive methodology which is actually a sui generis synthesis between classical and modern heritage. The rigorous application of the new research programme leads to the organisation of an Orientation Table, that is, a methodological map of all possible combinations (systems). The Table shows, without any exaggeration, a few revolutionary results. For instance, with the help of the Table, modern science or the second revolution (Einstein, Bohr,Heisenberg) does not appear contradictory but rather complementary to classical science or the first revolution (Newton,Lavoisier). The Kuhnian thesis to the contrary is disproved and the second crisis is solved. With the help of the Universal Hypothesis of Duality (the basis of the Orientation Table), matter and energy, at the micro – and macro‐level, appear in a double form (the Principle of Duality): stable (equilibrium) particles and unstable (disequilibrium)waves. The strong interactions from modern physics are associated with the law of gravitation (attraction) or stable equilibrium which governs stable matter and energy. The weak interactions are associated with the law of disgravitation (dispersion or repulsion)including entropy or unstable equilibrium which governs unstable matter and energy. In this way the first crisis is also solved.
Article navigation
1 April 1989
Research Article|
April 01 1989
Principia Methodologica 1: A Bridge from Economics to all Other Natural Sciences Towards a Methodological Unification of all Sciences
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6712
Print ISSN: 0306-8293
© MCB UP Limited
1989
International Journal of Social Economics (1989) 16 (4): 3–76.
Citation
Rugina AN (1989), "Principia Methodologica 1: A Bridge from Economics to all Other Natural Sciences Towards a Methodological Unification of all Sciences". International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 16 No. 4 pp. 3–76, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000000443
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
“Teach ten thousand stars how not to dance”: a survey of alternative ontologies in marketing research
Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal (December,2001)
The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science
Reference Reviews (May,2002)
The Cambridge Companion to Newton
Reference Reviews (July,2002)
Profile and Academic Vita of Stafford Beer
Kybernetes (June,1993)
Why the cosmos has to be stochastic
Kybernetes (April,2001)
Related Chapters
Epistemological Problems and Ontological Solutions: A Critical Realist Retrospective on Althusser
Research in Political Economy
Philosophy as the Foundation of Education
Rethinking Philosophy for Education, Society and Human Development in Sub-Saharan Africa
Public Policies in Innovation: Government Funding S&T Through a Federal Agency
The Brazilian Way of Doing Public Administration: Brazil with an ‘s’
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
