For any developing countries in the 20th century, there exists a problem of how to choose the economic development route –socialist or capitalist; which means how to compare different social and economic benefits and make different value judgements in economic development. Socialism is not a pure political and ideological question,certainly not just a political question. It is a way for developing countries, particularly large agricultural countries, to realise their industrialisation and modern commercial economy. Essentially, it is a focus of development economics. For economically backward countries the aim of socialism is not to fight against the capitalist world, but first to develop their own economy. Socialist public ownership connected with the stage of economic development involves inner contradictions in its own development from the very beginning. We cannot make socialist public ownership perfect without overcoming those contradictions. Public ownership cannot improve social productivity without coming across its own historical limitation. Economic reforms now being practised in China are an effort to improve socialist public ownership: to reform traditional forms of public ownership which have not satisfied the development of productivity. Socialism and public ownership are not features for economically backward countries to flaunt. Neither are they historical trends. They are a way to get rid of poverty, and to realise a modern commercial economy, a way different from the development route of capitalism. There are historical necessity and economic rationality for that kind of socialist public ownership connected with economic development of backward countries. And, of course, socialist public ownership has its own inner contradictions and historical limitations,just like any other kind of ownership in history. It changes and develops continually. Socialist public ownership needs to improve itself, to realise its own development and evolution, and finally to make assets of public ownership the social capital satisfying the demand of highly socialised productivity.
Article navigation
1 August 1991
Research Article|
August 01 1991
China: Economic Development and Evolution of Socialist Public Ownership Available to Purchase
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6712
Print ISSN: 0306-8293
© MCB UP Limited
1991
International Journal of Social Economics (1991) 18 (8-9-10): 60–66.
Citation
Haiyan G (1991), "China: Economic Development and Evolution of Socialist Public Ownership". International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 18 No. 8-9-10 pp. 60–66, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299110144183
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Sir Hans Singer: The Life and Work of a Development Economist
Journal of Economic Studies (October,2004)
Financial intermediation and economic growth in developing countries
Journal of Economic Studies (June,1998)
Liang Qichao, Sun Yat‐sen, and the 1905‐1907 debate on socialism
International Journal of Social Economics (December,2005)
Comment on Richard B. Freeman’s “Labor markets and institutions in economic development”
International Journal of Social Economics (January,1996)
Should we try to bridge the global digital divide?
Info (June,2002)
Related Chapters
Foreign Direct Investment: General Overview
Foreign Direct Investment: Global Capital, Local Impact
Entrepreneurship as a Boost of Economic Growth in Mexico and Chile
Regional Integration in Latin America: Dynamics of the Pacific Alliance
Implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Developing Countries
International Financial Reporting Standards Implementation: A Global Experience
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
