Criticizes the view that ethical judgements are completely separate from facts and theories in the social sciences. On the contrary, it argues that no project can be initiated nor any facts collected without some goal in mind and no important statement can be made in the social sciences without involving an ethical view. An ethical framework is one part of every social scientist′s paradigm (using the word in the sense of Thomas Kuhn) and we always work within that paradigm using those ethical values ‐even when social scientists claim to be purely“objective” with no ethical values in their work. Argues that Marx had an ethical view based not on any supernatural entity or imperative, but on the needs and desires of all of humanity. Marxist social science, like Institutionalist social science, is based on the view that every social science project must involve both factual research and an ethical framework.
Article navigation
1 July 1992
Research Article|
July 01 1992
Marxism and Humanism Available to Purchase
Howard Sherman
Howard Sherman
University of California, Riverside, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6712
Print ISSN: 0306-8293
© MCB UP Limited
1992
International Journal of Social Economics (1992) 19 (7-8-9): 58–70.
Citation
Sherman H (1992), "Marxism and Humanism". International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 19 No. 7-8-9 pp. 58–70, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000000487
Download citation file:
741
Views
Suggested Reading
Economics, civilisation, and knowledge
International Journal of Social Economics (August,2002)
Wants and Metawants: Marshall's Concern for Higher Values
International Journal of Social Economics (September,1990)
Islamic Economics as a Social Science
International Journal of Social Economics (June,1990)
Economics for the Common Good: Two Centuries of Social Economic Thought in the Humanistic Tradition
International Journal of Social Economics (December,2000)
“Option for the Poor” as a Socio‐economic Principle
International Journal of Social Economics (May,1989)
Related Chapters
Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
About ‘Othering’ Ourselves in a System with Discrepant Values: The Research Ethics Review Process Today
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
Towards Common Principles for Social Science Research Ethics: A Discussion Document for the Academy of Social Sciences
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
