In the light of a resurgence of “evolutionary”research, sets out to raise some of the philosophical issues associated with an evolutionary conception of economics. Considers Tony Lawson′s work on transcendental realism as a point of departure in the building of an argument which promotes the adoption of a pluralist and holistic conception of economics. Suggests that, while Lawson′s transcendental realism has largely been developed independently of evolutionary economics, with the modifications outlined it may provide a suitable starting point for the formulation of philosophical foundations of evolutionary economics. Augments Lawson′s argument by the suggested adoption of an organic framework and the notion of types as the means of providing a base for the pluralist outlook of evolutionary economics.
Article navigation
1 December 1995
Conceptual Paper|
December 01 1995
Transcendental realism – a foundation for evolutionary economics?
Pradeep Philip
Pradeep Philip
The University of Queensland Brisbane, Australia.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6712
Print ISSN: 0306-8293
© MCB UP Limited
1995
International Journal of Social Economics (1995) 22 (12): 19–35.
Citation
Philip P (1995), "Transcendental realism – a foundation for evolutionary economics?". International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 22 No. 12 pp. 19–35, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299510104723
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Towards a New Principia Politica: The Third Revolution in Political Science
International Journal of Social Economics (February,1990)
Contact styles
The Learning Organization: An International Journal (December,2002)
The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Reference Reviews (June,2003)
The Private versus the Social Man
International Journal of Social Economics (August,1989)
The philosophy of action science
Journal of Managerial Psychology (September,1995)
Related Chapters
Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
About ‘Othering’ Ourselves in a System with Discrepant Values: The Research Ethics Review Process Today
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
Towards Common Principles for Social Science Research Ethics: A Discussion Document for the Academy of Social Sciences
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
