The chaebols in Korea contained some problems. One is that they have represented a disturbing concentration of market power. There is no evidence of the big firms colluding; for the most part they compete fiercely. But, taken together, the four biggest chaebols, Hyundai, Samsung, Daewoo and LG, employ only 3 per cent of the workforce while accounting for almost a third of the total sales of all South Korean companies. These four groups alone handle nearly 60 per cent of total exports. The concentration of ownership is tighter still, the families that founded the top 30 chaebols still own perhaps 60 per cent of their combined equity. The formation of chaebol and its developing process will be reviewed and some points of their systematic problems will be summarized in this paper. Adjustment cost and equity on the reform of chaebol also will be discussed. It is natural to argue that the productive efficiency engaged in super size enterprise group should be one of the objectives which inflict large costs on the economy. It can be suggested that more reform would be efficient in choosing a new system. Professional management seems to be one of the practically efficient outcomes. As a efficient policy, it will withstand future policy challenges better than the status quo. In terms of economic efficiency and equity as well, professional management systems which clean out illegal behaviour consistently may represent an optimal mix as long as they are under the present system.
Article navigation
1 March 2002
Viewpoint|
March 01 2002
An estimation of the productive efficiency of chaebols of Korea and their reform Available to Purchase
Joong‐Kwan Kim
Joong‐Kwan Kim
Graduate School of Investmnet and Information, MyongJi University, Seoul, Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6712
Print ISSN: 0306-8293
© MCB UP Limited
2002
International Journal of Social Economics (2002) 29 (3): 172–186.
Citation
Kim J (2002), "An estimation of the productive efficiency of chaebols of Korea and their reform". International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 29 No. 3 pp. 172–186, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290210417070
Download citation file:
369
Views
Suggested Reading
Innovation knowledge exchange within Chaebols and the ownership structure of their foreign subsidiaries
Cross Cultural & Strategic Management (March,2024)
Socioemotional wealth and family feuds: corporate social responsibility as insurance
Management Decision (September,2023)
Labor unions, pay disparity and financial statement comparability
International Journal of Managerial Finance (January,2024)
Effects of international entry‐order strategies on foreign subsidiary exit: The case of Korean chaebols
Management Decision (October,2011)
Capital budgeting practices: evidence from Korea
Managerial Finance (September,2020)
Related Chapters
Methodological Issues in Business Group Research from a Korean Perspective
West Meets East: Building Theoretical Bridges
The Effects of Organizational Culture and Structure on the Success of Activity-Based Costing Implementation
Advances in Management Accounting
Introduction: Bringing Jobs Back In: Toward a New Multi-Level Approach to the Study of Work and Organizations
The Structuring of Work in Organizations
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
