Technological innovation has opened up the possibility of reproduction through non‐traditional methods. Once it was only possible to have children through direct sexual intercourse. Those seeking to bear children would therefore adhere to a traditional form of the family or would form a one‐off contract or liaison with some person who abdicates responsibly for the child after birth. The latter method could be used simply for the sake of having children but appears to function as a means of providing children where there is a problem with conception in a traditional family. The available alternatives involve the artificial bringing together of reproductive elements without direct human contact. In the traditional family structure, depending on the problems faced, artificial insemination by partner (Al) or artificial insemination by donor (AID) can be used. In the United Kingdom AID is provided administratively rather than through the market and the normal expectation is that it is a means of sustaining the traditional family. Donors of sperm receive a small fixed fee and there is an attempt to match their physical characteristics with those of the would be father they are deputising for.
Article navigation
1 March 1992
Review Article|
March 01 1992
ON THE ATTITUDES TO AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION Available to Purchase
Samuel Cameron;
Samuel Cameron
Department of Social and Economic Studies, University of Bradford
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard Welford
Richard Welford
Management Centre, University of Bradford
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6720
Print ISSN: 0144-333X
© MCB UP Limited
1992
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy (1992) 12 (3): 58–64.
Citation
Cameron S, Welford R (1992), "ON THE ATTITUDES TO AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION". International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 12 No. 3 pp. 58–64, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb013161
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Researching sensitive fields: Some lessons from a study of sperm donors in Israel
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy (October,2008)
FAMILY‐MAKING BY AID
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy (March,1982)
Systems based approach to a small scale dairy farm (Goshala): a case study
Built Environment Project and Asset Management (April,2022)
Electro-thermal coupled MHD Jeffrey fluid modeling of cervical mucus: implications for thermal-sensitive drug delivery and sperm motility diagnostics
International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow (April,2026)
Moral considerations on infertility and artificial reproductive technics
Journal of Ethics in
Entrepreneurship and Technology (September,2022)
Related Chapters
“We are both her mothers and I want the world to know that”: Parent term selection among lesbian co-parents with children conceived through donor insemination
Visions of the 21st Century Family: Transforming Structures and Identities
Spectacular Reproduction Revealed: Genetic Genealogy Testing as a Re(tro)productive Technology
Technologies of Reproduction Across the Lifecourse: Expanding Reproductive Studies
Making sense of donors and donor siblings: A comparison of the perceptions of donor-conceived offspring in lesbian-parent and heterosexual-parent families The first two authors contributed equally to this chapter.
Visions of the 21st Century Family: Transforming Structures and Identities
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
